PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Displaying network IP addresses

 
 
Mike Hyndman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Sep 2005
Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
TIA
Mike H
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
CJT
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Sep 2005
Mike Hyndman wrote:

> Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
> the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
> TIA
> Mike H


"Connected" in what sense?

Accessible?

In the arp table?

Currently doing accesses?

....

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hyndman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:56:04 GMT, CJT <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Mike Hyndman wrote:
>
>> Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>> the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>> TIA
>> Mike H

>
>"Connected" in what sense?
>
>Accessible?
>
>In the arp table?
>
>Currently doing accesses?

40+ PC's , WAP's, gateways etc., all access able from the server. The IP
addresses are fixed not dynamic. Since replacing 20 PC's, we have been
getting a message on some that their address already exists on the
network. (IP addresses merely replicated from the PC's which were
replaced, which never exhibited this problem)The IP address is then
changed and all is the well for a few days then the message appears on
other PC's. I know that the one way would be to go around all the PC's
etc., and do an IP config for the info but it would be quicker if
something could be run centrally. I think that the problem is down to
people using laptops on the wireless part of the network.
Many thanks
MH
>
>...


 
Reply With Quote
 
CJT
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005
Mike Hyndman wrote:

> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:56:04 GMT, CJT <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Hyndman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>>>the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>>>TIA
>>>Mike H

>>
>>"Connected" in what sense?
>>
>>Accessible?
>>
>>In the arp table?
>>
>>Currently doing accesses?

>
> 40+ PC's , WAP's, gateways etc., all access able from the server. The IP
> addresses are fixed not dynamic. Since replacing 20 PC's, we have been
> getting a message on some that their address already exists on the
> network. (IP addresses merely replicated from the PC's which were
> replaced, which never exhibited this problem)The IP address is then
> changed and all is the well for a few days then the message appears on
> other PC's. I know that the one way would be to go around all the PC's
> etc., and do an IP config for the info but it would be quicker if
> something could be run centrally. I think that the problem is down to
> people using laptops on the wireless part of the network.
> Many thanks
> MH
>
>>...

>
>

In that case, you need to look at the range of addresses the DHCP
service associated with the wireless is handing out.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kurt
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005

nbtstat -A <ip address> will list the netbios name of the computer with that
IP address (obvioiusly won't work from the computer reporting the IP address
conflict).

nbtstat -a <computername> will do the reverse.

For either, the computer must be in broadcast range and NetBios over TCP/IP
enabled, or registered in WINS.

Other than that, you can ping, do "arp -a" and you'll get the mac address,
but really doesn't help you to identify the location of the machine. There
are utilities like LanGuard LanNetScan that'll report al kinds of stuff.
Beware, it's likely to set off alarms if you have network security in place.

I'd take the opportunity to visit each machine, gather information and put
it in a spreadsheet for future reference. Then INSIST that your net admin
staff input changes whenever they move a computer, change a NIC, change an
IP address, etc. Also, with 40 computers, maintaining a static network is
getting labor intensive enough to switch to DHCP. Let DHCP register each
lease in DNS, and you'll never need to look any farther than you DNS snap-in
to identify which computer has which IP address.

....kurt

"Mike Hyndman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:56:04 GMT, CJT <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Mike Hyndman wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>>> the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>>> TIA
>>> Mike H

>>
>>"Connected" in what sense?
>>
>>Accessible?
>>
>>In the arp table?
>>
>>Currently doing accesses?

> 40+ PC's , WAP's, gateways etc., all access able from the server. The IP
> addresses are fixed not dynamic. Since replacing 20 PC's, we have been
> getting a message on some that their address already exists on the
> network. (IP addresses merely replicated from the PC's which were
> replaced, which never exhibited this problem)The IP address is then
> changed and all is the well for a few days then the message appears on
> other PC's. I know that the one way would be to go around all the PC's
> etc., and do an IP config for the info but it would be quicker if
> something could be run centrally. I think that the problem is down to
> people using laptops on the wireless part of the network.
> Many thanks
> MH
>>
>>...

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
CJT
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005
CJT wrote:

> Mike Hyndman wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:56:04 GMT, CJT <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Mike Hyndman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>>>> the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>>>> TIA
>>>> Mike H
>>>
>>>
>>> "Connected" in what sense?
>>>
>>> Accessible?
>>>
>>> In the arp table?
>>>
>>> Currently doing accesses?

>>
>>
>> 40+ PC's , WAP's, gateways etc., all access able from the server. The IP
>> addresses are fixed not dynamic. Since replacing 20 PC's, we have been
>> getting a message on some that their address already exists on the
>> network. (IP addresses merely replicated from the PC's which were
>> replaced, which never exhibited this problem)The IP address is then
>> changed and all is the well for a few days then the message appears on
>> other PC's. I know that the one way would be to go around all the PC's
>> etc., and do an IP config for the info but it would be quicker if
>> something could be run centrally. I think that the problem is down to
>> people using laptops on the wireless part of the network.
>> Many thanks
>> MH
>>
>>> ...

>>
>>
>>

> In that case, you need to look at the range of addresses the DHCP
> service associated with the wireless is handing out.
>

Sorry, I realize now I was off point, because you said you're using
static addresses. That's why DHCP was invented. After a point, with
a dynamic network, the management of static addresses is unwieldy.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hyndman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:10:46 -0700, "Kurt"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>nbtstat -A <ip address> will list the netbios name of the computer with that
>IP address (obvioiusly won't work from the computer reporting the IP address
>conflict).
>
>nbtstat -a <computername> will do the reverse.
>
>For either, the computer must be in broadcast range and NetBios over TCP/IP
>enabled, or registered in WINS.
>
>Other than that, you can ping, do "arp -a" and you'll get the mac address,
>but really doesn't help you to identify the location of the machine. There
>are utilities like LanGuard LanNetScan that'll report al kinds of stuff.
>Beware, it's likely to set off alarms if you have network security in place.
>
>I'd take the opportunity to visit each machine, gather information and put
>it in a spreadsheet for future reference. Then INSIST that your net admin
>staff input changes whenever they move a computer, change a NIC, change an
>IP address, etc. Also, with 40 computers, maintaining a static network is
>getting labor intensive enough to switch to DHCP. Let DHCP register each
>lease in DNS, and you'll never need to look any farther than you DNS snap-in
>to identify which computer has which IP address.
>
>...kurt

Kurt,

Many thanks, I don't think that DHCP is an option as we need to be
found, by our "superiors" at a certain address and not that one that
could change by a few points each time, for file transfer etc, hence the
static addresses. When the network was first installed it only had 10
PC's attached to the router, but with the advent of wireless it has
tended to expand somewhat. I thought that the only way to sort it would
be to go around them all....;-(
Again many thanks
Mike H
>>>...

>>

>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hyndman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Sep 2005

>>>
>>>

>> In that case, you need to look at the range of addresses the DHCP
>> service associated with the wireless is handing out.
>>

>Sorry, I realize now I was off point, because you said you're using
>static addresses. That's why DHCP was invented. After a point, with
>a dynamic network, the management of static addresses is unwieldy.
>Sorry, I realize now I was off point, because you said you're using
>static addresses. That's why DHCP was invented. After a point, with
>a dynamic network, the management of static addresses is unwieldy.

Tell me about it! 8-)
Again many thanks
Mike H

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      5th Sep 2005
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:51:19 +0100, Mike Hyndman
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>TIA
>Mike H


Click Start then Help and Support to open XP's Help and Support
Center.
Choose "Networking and the Web."
Click "Fixing networking or Web problems" on the left,
Then : under Pick A Task on the right choose:
"Diagnose network configuration and run automated networking tests".
Choose "Scan your system."
OR Check off appropriate boxes in "Set scanning options" first then
click Scan Your System.

Jan
 
Reply With Quote
 
CJT
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      5th Sep 2005
Jan wrote:

> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:51:19 +0100, Mike Hyndman
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>Is there a utility that can be run on an NT4 server which will display
>>the IP addresses of all the connected PC's.(WXP)
>>TIA
>>Mike H

>
>
> Click Start then Help and Support to open XP's Help and Support


Is that also available under NT4 as requested?

> Center.
> Choose "Networking and the Web."
> Click "Fixing networking or Web problems" on the left,
> Then : under Pick A Task on the right choose:
> "Diagnose network configuration and run automated networking tests".
> Choose "Scan your system."
> OR Check off appropriate boxes in "Set scanning options" first then
> click Scan Your System.
>
> Jan



--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Displaying Addresses in sent folder =?Utf-8?B?Z2thbWVlcw==?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 0 13th Nov 2007 05:10 PM
Displaying full sender addresses Ken Wallewein Microsoft Outlook 3 23rd Feb 2007 12:49 PM
Displaying Email Addresses Jerry Microsoft Outlook Discussion 1 27th Apr 2004 08:42 PM
Displaying e-mail addresses Ed Handley Microsoft Outlook 3 20th Apr 2004 12:30 PM
Displaying Email Addresses Lisa Microsoft Outlook Contacts 8 10th Mar 2004 10:07 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 PM.