PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Disk Speed Test

 
 
Pat
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Nov 2003
I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA is
On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive and
its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the make
and model of the drive.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Joep
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Nov 2003
"Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:7Yowb.9734$7%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA

is
> On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
> access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive and
> its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the make
> and model of the drive.
>
>


Thanks, very informative.

--
Joep


 
Reply With Quote
 
Pat
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Nov 2003

"Joep" <j o e p @ d i y d a t a r e c o v e r y . n l> wrote in message
news:ca65$3fc24b08$3eddca68$(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:7Yowb.9734$7%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA

> is
> > On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
> > access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive

and
> > its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the

make
> > and model of the drive.
> >
> >

>
> Thanks, very informative.



Ooooops!

QUESTION:

Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with very slow average access times
above 20MS?

If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?

Thanks,

Pat


 
Reply With Quote
 
Rod Speed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Nov 2003

"Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:9txwb.561$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Joep" <j o e p @ d i y d a t a r e c o v e r y . n l> wrote in message
> news:ca65$3fc24b08$3eddca68$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > "Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:7Yowb.9734$7%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA

> > is
> > > On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
> > > access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive

> and
> > > its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the

> make
> > > and model of the drive.
> > >
> > >

> >
> > Thanks, very informative.

>
>
> Ooooops!
>
> QUESTION:


> Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with
> very slow average access times above 20MS?


Nope.

> If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?


diskspeed32 is a steaming turd, not a benchmark.

HDTach is much better but it isnt free unless you've got the drive formatted fat32.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob WIllard
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Nov 2003
Pat wrote:
> "Joep" <j o e p @ d i y d a t a r e c o v e r y . n l> wrote in message
> news:ca65$3fc24b08$3eddca68$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>"Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:7Yowb.9734$7%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>>>I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA

>>
>>is
>>
>>>On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
>>>access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive

>
> and
>
>>>its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the

>
> make
>
>>>and model of the drive.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Thanks, very informative.

>
>
>
> Ooooops!
>
> QUESTION:
>
> Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with very slow average access times
> above 20MS?
>
> If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pat
>
>


If you want reliable results from a HD benchmark, then you must run it
standalone; sharing the CPU+OS with other processes can contaminate
the results. And, run the benchmark a few times to verify that your
results are consistent -- inconsistent results should be ignored, and
you should try to understand what is causing non-repeatable results.
--
Cheers, Bob

 
Reply With Quote
 
LittleRed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Nov 2003
Bob WIllard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<ZSIwb.227959$275.862379@attbi_s53>...
> Pat wrote:
> > "Joep" <j o e p @ d i y d a t a r e c o v e r y . n l> wrote in message
> > news:ca65$3fc24b08$3eddca68$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> >>"Pat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >>news:7Yowb.9734$7%(E-Mail Removed)...
> >>
> >>>I ran DISKSPEED32 on a Dell Dimension 4300 with Windows XP Home SP1 (DMA
> >>
> >>is
> >>
> >>>On) and 512MB of memory. The trasfer rate showed 37MBps. But the average
> >>>access time showed over 23MS. Its supposed to be an 80GB 7200RPM drive

> >
> > and
> >
> >>>its the one that came with the Dell Dimension 4300. I don't know the

> >
> > make
> >
> >>>and model of the drive.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Thanks, very informative.

> >
> >
> >
> > Ooooops!
> >
> > QUESTION:
> >
> > Are there 7200 RPM 80 GB hard drives with very slow average access times
> > above 20MS?
> >
> > If not, what could possible cause a slow benchmark result like that?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Pat
> >
> >

>
> If you want reliable results from a HD benchmark, then you must run it
> standalone; sharing the CPU+OS with other processes can contaminate
> the results. And, run the benchmark a few times to verify that your
> results are consistent -- inconsistent results should be ignored, and
> you should try to understand what is causing non-repeatable results.


Please enlighten us, what do we use?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Egil Solberg
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Nov 2003

"Rod Speed" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpufj8$1spl2b$(E-Mail Removed)...

> HDTach is much better but it isnt free unless you've got the drive

formatted fat32.

Hi! http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public...request=HdTach

With version 2.7 they give access to read-operation on WinXP/2000 systems
under NTFS. Works fine here.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Wayne Youngman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Nov 2003

"Egil Solberg" wrote
> Hi! http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public...request=HdTach
>
> With version 2.7 they give access to read-operation on WinXP/2000 systems
> under NTFS. Works fine here.




Hello,

thanks for posting that link. I been meaning to download HDTach for weeks
now (busy, busy). I been wanting to benchmark my SATA RAID-0 set-up and I
hear HDTach is pretty reliable (Rod Speed!). . .
--
Wayne ][

Barton (AQXEA) XP2500+ @ 2.2GHz (10x220) - 1.775vCore
CoolerMaster Aero 7 Lite - 3,200rpm
ABIT NF7-S (v2.0 - BIOS#14)
512MB Dual TwiSTER PC3500 @ DDR440 1:1 (9,4,4,2.0 - 2.7v)
Sapphire Atlantis 9800 - 3.3ns Samsung (325/290 Default)
240GB (2x120GB) WD-SE SATA RAID-0 (16k Stripe)
Antec SX630II Mini-Tower Case Inc 300w PSU
2 x CoolerMaster 80mm Blue Neon Fans
WinXP-PRO-SP1
Cat 3.7 - DX9.0b


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What free hard disk utility to test disk performance Workbug DIY PC 2 1st Feb 2011 10:48 AM
Norton Speed Disk can't optimize my disk! (sollution) woodchuck@postpro.net Windows XP General 27 21st May 2006 12:03 AM
Why is my HTTP download speed clock higher then a speed test tom23499@yahoo.com Windows XP Internet Explorer 3 19th Nov 2005 07:30 PM
Why does my HTTP download speed higher then speed test tom23499@yahoo.com Windows XP Internet Explorer 1 19th Nov 2005 01:45 AM
Norton Speed Disk leaves disk more fragmented? Rajesh Kirpalani Windows XP Help 1 9th Feb 2004 12:24 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM.