After installing Vista RC1 x86 and x64 I performed a disk defragmentation on
x86 & x64. After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
Diskeeper 10 on both partitions, there were very few fragments left, each
partition was done in about 5 minutes. With beta 2 x86 & x64 very few
fragments were eliminated by the built-in program which ran for a long time
and did nothing.

I have RC1 asnd diskeeper 10 will not install, states wrong version. What
are you using and can you provide a link?

Dirk-Thomas

"Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
in message news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> After installing Vista RC1 x86 and x64 I performed a disk defragmentation
> on x86 & x64. After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
> Diskeeper 10 on both partitions, there were very few fragments left, each
> partition was done in about 5 minutes. With beta 2 x86 & x64 very few
> fragments were eliminated by the built-in program which ran for a long
> time and did nothing.
>
>

Try this link:

http://www.diskeeper.com/profile/sub...px?a=l&PId=104

Lang

<DIV>&quot;Dirk-Thomas Brown&quot; &lt;(E-Mail Removed)&gt;
wrote in message
news:50A21CB8-6DE8-4943-8986-(E-Mail Removed)...</DIV>>I have RC1
asnd diskeeper 10 will not install, states wrong version. What
> are you using and can you provide a link?
>
> Dirk-Thomas
>
> "Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote in message news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> After installing Vista RC1 x86 and x64 I performed a disk defragmentation
>> on x86 & x64. After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
>> Diskeeper 10 on both partitions, there were very few fragments left, each
>> partition was done in about 5 minutes. With beta 2 x86 & x64 very few
>> fragments were eliminated by the built-in program which ran for a long
>> time and did nothing.
>>
>>
>

"Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" wrote:

> After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
> Diskeeper 10 on both partitions

why you don't use the built-in Vista's Defragmenter???

In article <FC68F64D-A228-4C82-8541-(E-Mail Removed)>, BillD
says...
>
>
> "Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" wrote:
>
> > After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
> > Diskeeper 10 on both partitions
>
> why you don't use the built-in Vista's Defragmenter???
>
Because it's shite.

--
Conor

How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the
stupidity-problem solve itself?

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:13:29 +0100, Conor <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>In article <FC68F64D-A228-4C82-8541-(E-Mail Removed)>, BillD
>says...
>>
>>
>> "Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" wrote:
>>
>> > After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
>> > Diskeeper 10 on both partitions
>>
>> why you don't use the built-in Vista's Defragmenter???
>>
>Because it's shite.

I wonder if Raxco's PerfectDisk v8 (due out this month) will support
Vista?
--
Michael Cecil
http://home.comcast.net/~macecil/
http://home.comcast.net/~safehex/

Thanks, downloaded the beta, installed as recommended via the
Administrator's account. Installs until it hits starting Diskeeper services,
errors with basically check permissions to start. Only option is retry or
cancel, when canceled it rolls back the install.

Any suggestions? Vista is RC1

Dirk-Thomas

"Lang Murphy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:8924E551-628F-418F-B24B-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Try this link:
>
> http://www.diskeeper.com/profile/sub...px?a=l&PId=104
>
> Lang
>
> <DIV>&quot;Dirk-Thomas Brown&quot; &lt;(E-Mail Removed)&gt;
> wrote in message
> news:50A21CB8-6DE8-4943-8986-(E-Mail Removed)...</DIV>>I have
> RC1 asnd diskeeper 10 will not install, states wrong version. What
>> are you using and can you provide a link?
>>
>> Dirk-Thomas
>>
>> "Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote in message news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> After installing Vista RC1 x86 and x64 I performed a disk
>>> defragmentation on x86 & x64. After this was done I booted back into
>>> Windows x64 to run Diskeeper 10 on both partitions, there were very few
>>> fragments left, each partition was done in about 5 minutes. With beta 2
>>> x86 & x64 very few fragments were eliminated by the built-in program
>>> which ran for a long time and did nothing.
>>>
>>>
>>

No, PerfectDisk v8 will not install. Just tried it..

"Michael Cecil" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:13:29 +0100, Conor <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>In article <FC68F64D-A228-4C82-8541-(E-Mail Removed)>, BillD
>>says...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dennis Pack x64, vista rc1 x86 & x64" wrote:
>>>
>>> > After this was done I booted back into Windows x64 to run
>>> > Diskeeper 10 on both partitions
>>>
>>> why you don't use the built-in Vista's Defragmenter???
>>>
>>Because it's shite.
>
> I wonder if Raxco's PerfectDisk v8 (due out this month) will support
> Vista?
> --
> Michael Cecil
> http://home.comcast.net/~macecil/
> http://home.comcast.net/~safehex/

In article <55E8890B-47C1-45A0-9A66-(E-Mail Removed)>, Dirk-
Thomas Brown says...
> Thanks, downloaded the beta, installed as recommended via the
> Administrator's account. Installs until it hits starting Diskeeper services,
> errors with basically check permissions to start. Only option is retry or
> cancel, when canceled it rolls back the install.
>
Auslogics Disk Defrag....freeware.


--
Conor

How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the
stupidity-problem solve itself?

Even better- command prompt-run as admin-defrag!!! lol
Works great-no pretty gui tho

Jeff
"Conor" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In article <55E8890B-47C1-45A0-9A66-(E-Mail Removed)>, Dirk-
> Thomas Brown says...
>> Thanks, downloaded the beta, installed as recommended via the
>> Administrator's account. Installs until it hits starting Diskeeper
>> services,
>> errors with basically check permissions to start. Only option is retry or
>> cancel, when canceled it rolls back the install.
>>
> Auslogics Disk Defrag....freeware.
>
>
> --
> Conor
>
> How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the
> stupidity-problem solve itself?