PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Disjointed Namespace with Root Zone required

 
 
adam
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Jul 2003
As my hair grays and falls out I can't get rid of this
problem...
I am setting up a new private forest with no Internet
connection allowed.
On "ROOT1", I fill in TCP/IP settings: 1.1.1.11 /
255.255.255.0 /1.1.1.11 with Primary DNS Server 1.1.1.11.
I reboot and add the DNS Service.
I created my Forward Lookup Zones ". " (so this is the
Root Server for the private Forest) and mil and my 1.1.1.X
Reverse Lookup Zone.
Then I set "Allow Dynamic Updates to YES" on all zones.
I reboot and verify the DNS settings are good.
I DCPromo "ROOT1", creating the new forest "mil" and
rebooted.
Then I set "Active Directory-Integrated" on all zones.
Testing DNS, nslookup on mil gets no response but mil.
does?

ROOT1's name under My Computer, Properties (root1.mil)
versus in DNS (root1.mil.) are different? Note that
the "." at the end on mil is the difference on the DNS
entry.

This forest will never have Internet access and the root
hints entries are not needed. I thought you must have
the "." zone to designate this as the root server.

Eventually there will be 3 root servers in the forest so
the "DNS Island Affect" can't happen.

Please tell me what I am doing wrong!?!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ace Fekay, MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Jul 2003
"adam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:00ec01c351fc$74dd3b50$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ace,
> Here is a more thorough description of my problem. Please
> note that I have replaced "mil" with "ihm". Thanks.
>
> We are setting up a new private forest with no Internet
> connection allowed.
> On "root1" DC, TCP/IP settings are
> 1.1.1.11/255.255.255.0/1.1.1.11, P DNS 1.1.1.11
> We add DNS Service, create Forward Lookup Zones "."
> and "ihm" and Reverse Lookup Zone 1.1.1.x
> Then set all zones to "Allow Dynamic Updates to YES".
> Reboot and verify DNS settings are OK.
> DCPROMO root1, creating the new forest "ihm" and reboot.
> Then set all zones to "AD-Integrated".
> Testing DNS, ihm gets no response but ihm. does.
>
> On "root2" DC, TCP/IP settings are
> 1.1.1.12/255.255.255.0/1.1.1.12, P DNS 1.1.1.11/ A DNS
> 1.1.1.12
> We add DNS Service, create Forward Lookup Zones "."
> and "ihm" and Reverse Lookup Zone 1.1.1.x
> Then set all zones to "Allow Dynamic Updates to YES".
> Reboot and verify DNS settings are OK.
> DCPROMO root2, join the "ihm" domain and reboot.
> Then set all zones to "AD-Integrated".
> Testing DNS, ihm gets no response but ihm. does.
>
> When netdiag /debug is performed, AD errors all say:
> The record on your DC is:
> DNS NAME = ihm.
> DNS DATA =
> A 7.47.181.11
>
> The record on DNS server 7.47.181.12 is:
> DNS NAME = ihm
> DNS DATA =
> A 7.47.181.11
> A 7.47.181.12
>
> ********** * ********** * ********** * ********** *
> ********** *
> * CHECK NAME _ldap._tcp.ihm. on DNS server 7.47.181.12
> ********** * ********** * ********** * ********** *
> ********** *
>
> The Record is different on DNS server '7.47.181.12'.
> DNS server has more than one entries for this name,
> usually this means there are multiple DCs for this domain.
> Your DC entry is one of them on DNS server '7.47.181.12',
> no need to re-register.
>
> The record on your DC is:
> DNS NAME = _ldap._tcp.ihm.
> DNS DATA =
> SRV 0 100 389 root1.ihm.
>
> The record on DNS server 7.47.181.12 is:
> DNS NAME = _ldap._tcp.ihm
> DNS DATA =
> SRV 0 100 389 root2.ihm
> SRV 0 100 389 root1.ihm
>
> The errors continue but all say the same thing ihm and
> ihm. are different!
>
> Is the "." zone needed to designate this a Root Server?
> We tried the same proceeds above without creating the "."
> zone and ended up with the same errors.


Hi Adam,

What errors? You mean this message?
> The Record is different on DNS server '7.47.181.12'.
> DNS server has more than one entries for this name,
> usually this means there are multiple DCs for this domain.
> Your DC entry is one of them on DNS server '7.47.181.12',
> no need to re-register.


I've seen that message often when you have mutliple DNS servers with AD
Integrated zones. So I wouldn't worry about it. The second part of the
message says it usually means there are multiple DCs for this domain and no
need to re-register, so don't worry about it.

Also, don't worry about the period. It's just the way the results are
displayed.

As for your single label DNS name, as I mentioned, can cause problems with
resolution in DNS. I would address that as soon as possible.

Hope I was able to understand your question and concerns.

--
Regards,
Ace

Please direct all replies to the newsgroup so all can benefit.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2000, MCSE+I, MCSA, MCT, MVP
Microsoft Windows MVP - Active Directory
--
=================================




 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fixing Disjointed DNS Namespace jwgoerlich@beogroup.com Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 7 15th Dec 2004 05:26 PM
namespace project root namespace confusion nick Microsoft Dot NET Framework 1 9th Nov 2004 01:14 PM
How to set a top-level namespace when you've defined a root namespace? Jeff Brown Microsoft VB .NET 1 23rd Sep 2004 05:15 PM
disjointed namespace - need the script Tsahy Erez Microsoft Windows 2000 DNS 2 18th Dec 2003 07:35 PM
Re: Disjointed namespace problem diasmith [MSFT] Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 0 8th Oct 2003 02:02 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 AM.