Could this be the problem? Does Outlook 2007 display pictures based upon
SIZE instead of PIXELS? In HTML (and Outlook Express), pictures are
normally displayed based upon their number of pixels, not upon their size.
For example, an 800x600 picture would normally be displayed at 800x600
pixels with whatever resolution the monitor was configured to use. Is
Outlook resizing my pictures, not recompressing them?
I ran this test... If I forward a message with a picture, copy that picture
from the original message (i.e., below my reply) and insert it into my
reply, the pasted picture looks somewhat smaller (and clearer) than the
picture below.
If this is what Outlook is doing, is there a way to tell Outlook to display
all pictures at my screen's resolution, not at some other resolution?
Here are answers to your questions...
> Which method of inserting do you use?
1. In Outlook 2007, click "New" to open a new message window.
2. Position cursor in message body.
3. Click "Insert" (i.e., Alt-N).
4. Click Picture icon (i.e., Alt-N/P).
5. From the "Insert Picture" pop-up window, click a .jpg file.
> Which method of saving do you use? (or is being used by the recipient)
I simply click the "Send" icon.
> What is the original size and dpi of the picture and what size and dpi are
> they when they arrive?
How can I reliably check the size and dpi of a message after it has been
sent from Outlook? When I right-click a picture in Outlook, I don't see a
Properties in the menu. I can copy a picture from a sent message and paste
it into another (or the same) Outlook message, but Photoshop does not allow
it to be pasted.
> Curious; why do you insert the picture in-line and not as an attachment?
> Apparently you use pictures like documents and not to "bright up" the
> email.
1. Convenience... As soon as someone opens my message, I want them to see
my pictures as if they were viewing a web page. I often have one or two
dozen pictures. That would be a lot of attachments to open.
2. Control... If I attached pictures, I would have no control over which
program opened the them. With inserted pictures, at least I know that the
recipient's email program (usually Outlook or Outlook Express) is displaying
them. With HTML, I can easily attach notes to pictures without having to
edit them.
3. Consistency... Many of my recipients are not PC experts. They might
not know how to open an attachment. Others might be intimidated by their
security software when they try to open an attachment. Still others might
not know how to use whatever program runs to display their attached
pictures.
Dave
"Roady [MVP]" <newsgroups_DELETE_@_DELETE_sparnaaij_NO_._SPAM_net> wrote in
message news:86E300FD-C6EC-4BB7-B918-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I've read this claim more often but I can't repro it here. Picture size,
> dimensions and dpi are the same for me for sending and receiving.
>
> Which method of inserting do you use?
> Which method of saving do you use? (or is being used by the recipient)
> What is the original size and dpi of the picture and what size and dpi are
> they when they arrive?
>
> Curious; why do you insert the picture in-line and not as an attachment?
> Apparently you use pictures like documents and not to "bright up" the
> email.
>
> --
> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
> http://www.howto-outlook.com/
> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>
> http://www.msoutlook.info/
> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>
> -----
>
> "David McCulloch" <|@|.|> wrote in message
> news:46cd071b$0$31874$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Five months ago, I posted this question, but no one was able to help.
>>
>> QUESTION: How do I disable picture compression in Outlook 2007?
>>
>> When I send a message, Outlook 2007 automatically recompresses my
>> inserted jpeg pictures, even after following Microsoft's HELP
>> instructions for deactivating picture compression.
>>
>> When inserted, pictures look fine. After a message has been sent,
>> however, one can easily see that Outlook reduces the quality of inserted
>> pictures (for example, they are not nearly as sharp as what I save in
>> Photoshop CS3 and subsequently insert into my messages).
>>
>> I am a photographer. I don't want Microsoft modifying my work. To me,
>> this "feature" of automatically compressing images is almost as bad as a
>> virus. Currently, my only option is to use Outlook Express instead of
>> Outlook 2007 when sending pictures. Unfortunately, this is extremely
>> inconvenient, especially when managing messages. Attaching pictures is
>> not an option.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> FYI, this is what Microsoft's Help says:
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> Change the Compress Pictures default settings
>>
>> The Compress Pictures feature automatically reduces the file size of
>> pictures when you save your document. You can also delete the cropped
>> parts of pictures from a file by using this feature.
>>
>> The Automatically perform basic compression on save option applies only
>> to the document that is open in the current program. All of the other
>> options in the Compression Settings dialog box apply to all documents in
>> Office Excel 2007, Office PowerPoint 2007, Office Word 2007, and Office
>> Outlook 2007.
>>
>> 1. Select a picture in the document.
>>
>> 2. Under Picture Tools, on the Format tab, in the Adjust group, click
>> Compress Pictures.
>>
>> 3. Click Options, and then do one or more of the following:
>>
>> * To stop automatic reduction of picture file size when you save the
>> document, clear the Automatically perform basic compression on save check
>> box. [I DID THIS]
>>
>> * To automatically delete cropped areas of pictures when you save the
>> document, select the Delete cropped areas of pictures check box, and then
>> click OK. [I DIDN'T DO THIS]
>>
>> * To automatically save cropped areas of pictures, clear the Delete
>> cropped areas of pictures check box. [I DIDN'T DO THIS]
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> Dave
>>