During the XPe chat last week, one of MS people said they would post to the
NG the registry fix for Directx 9c being reported as 9b. So far I haven't
seen it. If somebody from MS reads this ...

TIA
Dan

Dan,

The fix is on http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/archi...11/450630.aspx

Pieter

"Dan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:AA946448-65FF-49FA-8F5E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> During the XPe chat last week, one of MS people said they would post to
> the
> NG the registry fix for Directx 9c being reported as 9b. So far I haven't
> seen it. If somebody from MS reads this ...
>
> TIA
> Dan

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:12:06 -0700, Dan <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

> During the XPe chat last week, one of MS people said they would post to the
> NG the registry fix for Directx 9c being reported as 9b. So far I haven't
> seen it. If somebody from MS reads this ...

Did he say "will post" or "have posted"?

Dan Simpson posted this last December:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...ca92cde9cfa446
or use http://tinyurl.com/adddy if your browser cut up the URL.

Read the entire thread, the solution is spread over several messages.

Hi,

Thanks. I found it.

Dan

"Pieter" wrote:

> Dan,
>
> The fix is on http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/archi...11/450630.aspx
>
> Pieter
>
> "Dan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:AA946448-65FF-49FA-8F5E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > During the XPe chat last week, one of MS people said they would post to
> > the
> > NG the registry fix for Directx 9c being reported as 9b. So far I haven't
> > seen it. If somebody from MS reads this ...
> >
> > TIA
> > Dan
>
>
>