On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:48:55 +1100, John Fitzsimons
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:05:19 GMT, fitwell <(E-Mail Removed)>
>wrote:
>
>< snip >
>
>>A quick, efficient and easy
>>way to list directory contents is something that I definitely need to
>>find. I tried writing a batch file but my knowledge isn't enough and
>>this is not worth the time it would take. A simple, customizable
>>32bit app that accepts permanent default changes is all that's needed.
>>LS comes close so see no reason there isn't something out there that
>>will fit the bill.
>
>>Anyone run across something that will do the job?
>
>You might like to check out :
>
>http://home.a03.itscom.net/tsuzu/programing/en/
>
>IMO it's options are excellent. I was thinking it should be a
>Priceless nomination but IIRC it adds it's web page, or something
>similar, to the output. Slightly annoying IMO but otherwise a good
>program.
We're talking about the same app, John, thanks! It doesn't do a good
job. By the time I change the settings, I can just as easily have
typed code into a dos box and gotten a better list in teh very same
folder I am in. This app, though tiny and though it appears ideal
initially, is more hassle than it's worth.
As I mentioned in my initial post, there was no way to change the
defaults that I could see so you're stuck with inflexible settings.
No good.
As I also stated in that post, if you are in a folder and open a DOS
box and then type in command.com and then:
dir /b > dircontext.txt
one gets better results that that app.
Here's why:
- if you're _in_ the folder you want to catalogue the contents of, you
have to go _out_ of the folder to use LS itself (major pain)
- it defaults to one drive although you _can_ set the output to any
drive you want via editing the ini file. But I believe it didn't keep
those settings permanently as I remember having to go back in to
re-type folder in again at some point. No good.
- if you do use the drag-'n-drop feature, you can't just drop it into
the app in general, you must specifically drop it into the tiny box
area <arggghhh!!>
- had to _always_ de-select and select several options on the
interface to get the right data in the output
All-in-all, it failed quite miserably esp. since doing the DOS way
turned out to be quicker, a very sad state of affairs when that's the
case!
I don't like relying on DOS, though, because today I remembered the
code I used yesterday but next time I go to do this, 100 to 1, I
won't.
This issue is one of the last big items on my wish list that I've
never found a good solution for, so very interested if anyone knows of
a competent, small app to list directory contents easily and that has
some flexibility and intelligence, unlike, sorry to say, LS.
Thanks, John! Much appreciated.