Hello.

I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help Centre:-

Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
1.
Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file anyway.

Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does leave me "wondering"!

However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .

However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original "tool" was published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.

This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)

Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much harder to remember!).

David B.

Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a trusted publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered with. The file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a Certificate Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can see the CAs that your computer trusts in Internet Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However if the date of the certificate has expired it is not considered valid and you will get a warning message stating such which apparently is what you are seeing. I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any company that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing certificates and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have been compromised. As always good backups of at least data files, ideally the System State also which includes registry backup, and possibly an image of the system drive is best practice to prevent undue hardship from any surprises that can include hardware failure. --- Steve

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx --- making backups on XP
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ntain/asr.mspx --- XP Automated System Recovery backup
"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
Hello.

I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help Centre:-

Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
1.
Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file anyway.

Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does leave me "wondering"!

However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .

However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original "tool" was published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.

This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)

Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much harder to remember!).

David B.

Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.

Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd used
the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need. However...........
I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes and will therefore follow
the Microsoft advice.

I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
............ what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a single
sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her ..... above which was
printed "I've been bitten".

Any comment or ideas why?

David B.

"Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a trusted
publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered with. The file
must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a Certificate Authority
that your computer trusts and be valid. You can see the CAs that your
computer trusts in Internet Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However
if the date of the certificate has expired it is not considered valid and
you will get a warning message stating such which apparently is what you are
seeing. I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their
certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any company
that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing certificates
and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have been compromised. As
always good backups of at least data files, ideally the System State also
which includes registry backup, and possibly an image of the system drive is
best practice to prevent undue hardship from any surprises that can include
hardware failure. --- Steve

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
--- making backups on XP
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ntain/asr.mspx ---
XP Automated System Recovery backup
"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
Hello.

I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
Centre:-

Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
1.
Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file anyway.

Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I believe
that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does leave me
"wondering"!

However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the Digital
Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a Digital Signature
which, when I check (say after downloading a programme from the Internet) to
have a date which is current .

However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to
obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate
which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft, and
was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and accept it
anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original "tool" was
published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always been sceptical
about this.

This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from
Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required to
"update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I
haven't, yet!)

Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital
Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always work as
one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much harder to
remember!).

David B.

Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it up
without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan for
malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve


"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>
> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd
> used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes and
> will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>
> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a single
> sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her ..... above which was
> printed "I've been bitten".
>
> Any comment or ideas why?
>
> David B.
>
> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a trusted
> publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered with. The file
> must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a Certificate Authority
> that your computer trusts and be valid. You can see the CAs that your
> computer trusts in Internet Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However
> if the date of the certificate has expired it is not considered valid and
> you will get a warning message stating such which apparently is what you
> are seeing. I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their
> certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any
> company that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing
> certificates and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have been
> compromised. As always good backups of at least data files, ideally the
> System State also which includes registry backup, and possibly an image of
> the system drive is best practice to prevent undue hardship from any
> surprises that can include hardware failure. --- Steve
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
> --- making backups on XP
>
> tp://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
> XP Automated System Recovery backup
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello.
>
> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
> Centre:-
>
> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
> 1.
> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file anyway.
>
> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
> place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
> well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I
> believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does leave
> me "wondering"!
>
> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a Digital
> Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a programme from the
> Internet) to have a date which is current .
>
> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to
> obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate
> which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft, and
> was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and accept
> it anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original "tool"
> was published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always been
> sceptical about this.
>
> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from
> Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required
> to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I
> haven't, yet!)
>
> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital
> Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always work
> as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much harder to
> remember!).
>
> David B.
>

I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again - result:-

Spybot found nothing!
Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)

Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I suppose!

Thanks for your interest Steve.

David


"Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it up
> without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan for
> malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>
>
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>
>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd
>> used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes and
>> will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>
>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
>> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
>> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a single
>> sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her ..... above which
>> was printed "I've been bitten".
>>
>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>
>> David B.
>>
>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a trusted
>> publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered with. The file
>> must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a Certificate
>> Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can see the CAs
>> that your computer trusts in Internet Explorer/tools/content -
>> certificates. However if the date of the certificate has expired it is
>> not considered valid and you will get a warning message stating such
>> which apparently is what you are seeing. I have no idea why these
>> companies have not renewed their certificates. However I would not be
>> that concerned about it as any company that values it's security will
>> carefully secure it's signing certificates and revoke any issued
>> certificates that they feel have been compromised. As always good
>> backups of at least data files, ideally the System State also which
>> includes registry backup, and possibly an image of the system drive is
>> best practice to prevent undue hardship from any surprises that can
>> include hardware failure. --- Steve
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>> --- making backups on XP
>>
>>
>> ://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hello.
>>
>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
>> Centre:-
>>
>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>> 1.
>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file anyway.
>>
>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
>> place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
>> well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I
>> believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does leave
>> me "wondering"!
>>
>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a Digital
>> Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a programme from the
>> Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>
>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
>> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to
>> obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate
>> which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft, and
>> was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and accept
>> it anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original "tool"
>> was published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always been
>> sceptical about this.
>>
>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from
>> Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required
>> to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I
>> haven't, yet!)
>>
>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital
>> Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always work
>> as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much harder
>> to remember!).
>>
>> David B.
>>
>
>

Be sure to scan for viruses also as those programs do not. I would not worry
about spyware that is detected if it is shown to be low risk by AdAware as
it is not unusual to find something after every internet browsing session.
Trend Micro has a great free utility called Sysclean that scans for and
deletes malware [virus/worm/trojan] it can detect. You do not have to
install it just run Sysclean from the same folder as their latest pattern
file. More info is at the link below and click Trend Micro pattern files
under the list for update center on the left hand side of the page to access
the pattern files. --- Steve

http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp

"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
news:eC$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again - result:-
>
> Spybot found nothing!
> Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
> Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)
>
> Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I
> suppose!
>
> Thanks for your interest Steve.
>
> David
>
>
> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it up
>> without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan for
>> malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>>
>>
>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd
>>> used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes and
>>> will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>>
>>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
>>> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
>>> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a single
>>> sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her ..... above which
>>> was printed "I've been bitten".
>>>
>>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>>
>>> David B.
>>>
>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a trusted
>>> publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered with. The
>>> file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a Certificate
>>> Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can see the CAs
>>> that your computer trusts in Internet Explorer/tools/content -
>>> certificates. However if the date of the certificate has expired it is
>>> not considered valid and you will get a warning message stating such
>>> which apparently is what you are seeing. I have no idea why these
>>> companies have not renewed their certificates. However I would not be
>>> that concerned about it as any company that values it's security will
>>> carefully secure it's signing certificates and revoke any issued
>>> certificates that they feel have been compromised. As always good
>>> backups of at least data files, ideally the System State also which
>>> includes registry backup, and possibly an image of the system drive is
>>> best practice to prevent undue hardship from any surprises that can
>>> include hardware failure. --- Steve
>>>
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>>> --- making backups on XP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
>>> Centre:-
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>>> 1.
>>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
>>> place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
>>> well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I
>>> believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does
>>> leave me "wondering"!
>>>
>>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a
>>> Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a programme
>>> from the Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>>
>>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
>>> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order to
>>> obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a Certificate
>>> which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with Microsoft,
>>> and was told that they were "aware of the problem" ............... and
>>> accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do with when the original
>>> "tool" was published and given its' Digital Signature, but I've always
>>> been sceptical about this.
>>>
>>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from
>>> Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it required
>>> to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated in 2004? (I
>>> haven't, yet!)
>>>
>>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the Digital
>>> Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't always
>>> work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting much
>>> harder to remember!).
>>>
>>> David B.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

I may not have followed you exactly Steve! I ended up here
http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp and DID download Sysclean - and,
guess what, the downloaded file, when checked for its' Digital Signature,
said it was from an Unknown Publisher!

Now why should that be? I thought I might be "safe" using this newsgroup!!

D.

"Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:JOSdnUjRn9LzX2reRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Be sure to scan for viruses also as those programs do not. I would not
> worry about spyware that is detected if it is shown to be low risk by
> AdAware as it is not unusual to find something after every internet
> browsing session. Trend Micro has a great free utility called Sysclean
> that scans for and deletes malware [virus/worm/trojan] it can detect. You
> do not have to install it just run Sysclean from the same folder as their
> latest pattern file. More info is at the link below and click Trend Micro
> pattern files under the list for update center on the left hand side of
> the page to access the pattern files. --- Steve
>
> http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp
>
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
> news:eC$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again - result:-
>>
>> Spybot found nothing!
>> Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
>> Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)
>>
>> Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I
>> suppose!
>>
>> Thanks for your interest Steve.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it up
>>> without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan for
>>> malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd
>>>> used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>>>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes and
>>>> will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>>>
>>>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
>>>> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
>>>> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a single
>>>> sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her ..... above which
>>>> was printed "I've been bitten".
>>>>
>>>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>>>
>>>> David B.
>>>>
>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a
>>>> trusted publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered
>>>> with. The file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a
>>>> Certificate Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can
>>>> see the CAs that your computer trusts in Internet
>>>> Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However if the date of the
>>>> certificate has expired it is not considered valid and you will get a
>>>> warning message stating such which apparently is what you are seeing. I
>>>> have no idea why these companies have not renewed their certificates.
>>>> However I would not be that concerned about it as any company that
>>>> values it's security will carefully secure it's signing certificates
>>>> and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have been
>>>> compromised. As always good backups of at least data files, ideally
>>>> the System State also which includes registry backup, and possibly an
>>>> image of the system drive is best practice to prevent undue hardship
>>>> from any surprises that can include hardware failure. --- Steve
>>>>
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>>>> --- making backups on XP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>>>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
>>>> Centre:-
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>>>> 1.
>>>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file
>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
>>>> place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
>>>> well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I
>>>> believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does
>>>> leave me "wondering"!
>>>>
>>>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>>>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a
>>>> Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a
>>>> programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>>>
>>>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
>>>> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order
>>>> to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a
>>>> Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with
>>>> Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem"
>>>> ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do
>>>> with when the original "tool" was published and given its' Digital
>>>> Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.
>>>>
>>>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free from
>>>> Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it
>>>> required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated
>>>> in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)
>>>>
>>>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the
>>>> Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't
>>>> always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's getting
>>>> much harder to remember!).
>>>>
>>>> David B.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

I would go ahead and use it. I have several times on different computers. It
sounds like you may be missing some certificates maybe? Anyhow you could
verify the MD5 hash of sysclean.com to see if it matches what they show. You
can download programs to do that such as fsum and check it like I did in the
example below. --- Steve

http://www.slavasoft.com/fsum/ --- Fsum

D:\test1>fsum sysclean.com

SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51
Implemented using SlavaSoft QuickHash Library <www.slavasoft.com>
Copyright (C) SlavaSoft Inc. 1999-2004. All rights reserved.

; SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51 <www.slavasoft.com>
;
; Generated on 02/19/06 at 01:59:45
;
7a84da903c56ba0646eacf6b42957594 *sysclean.com

"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I may not have followed you exactly Steve! I ended up here
>http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp and DID download Sysclean - and,
>guess what, the downloaded file, when checked for its' Digital Signature,
>said it was from an Unknown Publisher!
>
> Now why should that be? I thought I might be "safe" using this newsgroup!!
>
> D.
>
> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:JOSdnUjRn9LzX2reRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Be sure to scan for viruses also as those programs do not. I would not
>> worry about spyware that is detected if it is shown to be low risk by
>> AdAware as it is not unusual to find something after every internet
>> browsing session. Trend Micro has a great free utility called Sysclean
>> that scans for and deletes malware [virus/worm/trojan] it can detect. You
>> do not have to install it just run Sysclean from the same folder as their
>> latest pattern file. More info is at the link below and click Trend Micro
>> pattern files under the list for update center on the left hand side of
>> the page to access the pattern files. --- Steve
>>
>> http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp
>>
>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>> news:eC$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again -
>>>result:-
>>>
>>> Spybot found nothing!
>>> Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
>>> Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)
>>>
>>> Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I
>>> suppose!
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest Steve.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it
>>>> up without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan
>>>> for malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as I'd
>>>>> used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>>>>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes
>>>>> and will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
>>>>> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
>>>>> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a
>>>>> single sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her .....
>>>>> above which was printed "I've been bitten".
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>>>>
>>>>> David B.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a
>>>>> trusted publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered
>>>>> with. The file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a
>>>>> Certificate Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can
>>>>> see the CAs that your computer trusts in Internet
>>>>> Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However if the date of the
>>>>> certificate has expired it is not considered valid and you will get a
>>>>> warning message stating such which apparently is what you are seeing.
>>>>> I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their
>>>>> certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any
>>>>> company that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing
>>>>> certificates and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have
>>>>> been compromised. As always good backups of at least data files,
>>>>> ideally the System State also which includes registry backup, and
>>>>> possibly an image of the system drive is best practice to prevent
>>>>> undue hardship from any surprises that can include hardware
>>>>> ailure. --- Steve
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>>>>> --- making backups on XP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ww.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>>>>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro Help
>>>>> Centre:-
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file
>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the first
>>>>> place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it was
>>>>> well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by Sophos, I
>>>>> believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about) it does
>>>>> leave me "wondering"!
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>>>>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a
>>>>> Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a
>>>>> programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>>>>
>>>>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
>>>>> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order
>>>>> to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a
>>>>> Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this with
>>>>> Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem"
>>>>> ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do
>>>>> with when the original "tool" was published and given its' Digital
>>>>> Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free
>>>>> from Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it
>>>>> required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated
>>>>> in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the
>>>>> Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't
>>>>> always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's
>>>>> getting much harder to remember!).
>>>>>
>>>>> David B.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

After further thought you probably are not missing any certificates but the
message simply means that the file is probably not signed and XP is warning
you of such. That does not always mean that the file is malicious. Checking
the MD5 hash in this case would show whether the file was authentic or
ot. --- Steve


"Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:wJidnYTSKPMfu2XeRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I would go ahead and use it. I have several times on different computers.
>It sounds like you may be missing some certificates maybe? Anyhow you could
>verify the MD5 hash of sysclean.com to see if it matches what they show.
>You can download programs to do that such as fsum and check it like I did
>in the example below. --- Steve
>
> http://www.slavasoft.com/fsum/ --- Fsum
>
> D:\test1>fsum sysclean.com
>
> SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51
> Implemented using SlavaSoft QuickHash Library <www.slavasoft.com>
> Copyright (C) SlavaSoft Inc. 1999-2004. All rights reserved.
>
> ; SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51 <www.slavasoft.com>
> ;
> ; Generated on 02/19/06 at 01:59:45
> ;
> 7a84da903c56ba0646eacf6b42957594 *sysclean.com
>
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I may not have followed you exactly Steve! I ended up here
>>http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp and DID download Sysclean -
>>and, guess what, the downloaded file, when checked for its' Digital
>>Signature, said it was from an Unknown Publisher!
>>
>> Now why should that be? I thought I might be "safe" using this
>> newsgroup!!
>>
>> D.
>>
>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:JOSdnUjRn9LzX2reRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Be sure to scan for viruses also as those programs do not. I would not
>>> worry about spyware that is detected if it is shown to be low risk by
>>> AdAware as it is not unusual to find something after every internet
>>> browsing session. Trend Micro has a great free utility called Sysclean
>>> that scans for and deletes malware [virus/worm/trojan] it can detect.
>>> You do not have to install it just run Sysclean from the same folder as
>>> their latest pattern file. More info is at the link below and click
>>> Trend Micro pattern files under the list for update center on the left
>>> hand side of the page to access the pattern files. --- Steve
>>>
>>> http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp
>>>
>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:eC$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again -
>>>>result:-
>>>>
>>>> Spybot found nothing!
>>>> Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
>>>> Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)
>>>>
>>>> Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I
>>>> suppose!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your interest Steve.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>> news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it
>>>>> up without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan
>>>>> for malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as
>>>>>> I'd used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>>>>>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes
>>>>>> and will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read and
>>>>>> decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly" version
>>>>>> ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page, but a
>>>>>> single sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her .....
>>>>>> above which was printed "I've been bitten".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>>> newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a
>>>>>> trusted publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered
>>>>>> with. The file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a
>>>>>> Certificate Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You can
>>>>>> see the CAs that your computer trusts in Internet
>>>>>> Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However if the date of the
>>>>>> certificate has expired it is not considered valid and you will get a
>>>>>> warning message stating such which apparently is what you are seeing.
>>>>>> I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their
>>>>>> certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any
>>>>>> company that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing
>>>>>> certificates and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have
>>>>>> been compromised. As always good backups of at least data files,
>>>>>> ideally the System State also which includes registry backup, and
>>>>>> possibly an image of the system drive is best practice to prevent
>>>>>> undue hardship from any surprises that can include hardware
>>>>>> ilure. --- Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>>>>>> --- making backups on XP
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ww.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>>>>>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>>>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro
>>>>>> Help Centre:-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file
>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the
>>>>>> first place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it
>>>>>> was well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by
>>>>>> Sophos, I believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned about)
>>>>>> it does leave me "wondering"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>>>>>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a
>>>>>> Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a
>>>>>> programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations of
>>>>>> Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in order
>>>>>> to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a
>>>>>> Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this
>>>>>> with Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem"
>>>>>> ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to do
>>>>>> with when the original "tool" was published and given its' Digital
>>>>>> Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free
>>>>>> from Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it
>>>>>> required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature dated
>>>>>> in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the
>>>>>> Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it doesn't
>>>>>> always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but it's
>>>>>> getting much harder to remember!).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Forgive me Steve - over this past few months I've changed from being a
simple, trusting human being into a highly sceptical and paranoid PC "nurd"!
I know absolutely nothing about you - and the advice you have given in your
last two messages goes right back to my concern at the beginning of this
post!

I have never heard of Slavasoft ............ Lavasoft - yes! How can I
possibly use their "fsum" programme when it comes in a .zip file and I have
no idea what will happen when (IF!) I were to extract the contents?

I need to study more and find anwswers to my concerns from sources that I
trust! Sorry.

David B.

"Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:h4ydnSK-(E-Mail Removed)...
> After further thought you probably are not missing any certificates but
> the message simply means that the file is probably not signed and XP is
> warning you of such. That does not always mean that the file is malicious.
> Checking the MD5 hash in this case would show whether the file was
> authentic or ot. --- Steve
>
>
> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:wJidnYTSKPMfu2XeRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I would go ahead and use it. I have several times on different computers.
>>It sounds like you may be missing some certificates maybe? Anyhow you
>>could verify the MD5 hash of sysclean.com to see if it matches what they
>>show. You can download programs to do that such as fsum and check it like
>>I did in the example below. --- Steve
>>
>> http://www.slavasoft.com/fsum/ --- Fsum
>>
>> D:\test1>fsum sysclean.com
>>
>> SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51
>> Implemented using SlavaSoft QuickHash Library <www.slavasoft.com>
>> Copyright (C) SlavaSoft Inc. 1999-2004. All rights reserved.
>>
>> ; SlavaSoft Optimizing Checksum Utility - fsum 2.51 <www.slavasoft.com>
>> ;
>> ; Generated on 02/19/06 at 01:59:45
>> ;
>> 7a84da903c56ba0646eacf6b42957594 *sysclean.com
>>
>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>I may not have followed you exactly Steve! I ended up here
>>>http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp and DID download Sysclean -
>>>and, guess what, the downloaded file, when checked for its' Digital
>>>Signature, said it was from an Unknown Publisher!
>>>
>>> Now why should that be? I thought I might be "safe" using this
>>> newsgroup!!
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:JOSdnUjRn9LzX2reRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Be sure to scan for viruses also as those programs do not. I would not
>>>> worry about spyware that is detected if it is shown to be low risk by
>>>> AdAware as it is not unusual to find something after every internet
>>>> browsing session. Trend Micro has a great free utility called Sysclean
>>>> that scans for and deletes malware [virus/worm/trojan] it can detect.
>>>> You do not have to install it just run Sysclean from the same folder as
>>>> their latest pattern file. More info is at the link below and click
>>>> Trend Micro pattern files under the list for update center on the left
>>>> hand side of the page to access the pattern files. --- Steve
>>>>
>>>> http://www.trendmicro.com/download/dcs.asp
>>>>
>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:eC$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>I did scan earlier today and "cleaned". I've just done so again -
>>>>>result:-
>>>>>
>>>>> Spybot found nothing!
>>>>> Trend Micro AntiSpyware found 10 items!
>>>>> Lavasoft Ad-Aware found 7 items (some the same as Trend)
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite amazing really - but the price to pay for surfing the .net I
>>>>> suppose!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your interest Steve.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>>> news:98idnZXgU_cfGGrenZ2dnUVZ_v-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>> Interesting. I just did the same thing and had no problem printing it
>>>>>> up without selecting printer friendly version. I would certainly scan
>>>>>> for malware/spyware including in Safe Mode. --- Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>> Well - I thought I'd seen it all!.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the links Steve. Whilst I had seen the pages before, as
>>>>>>> I'd used the Windows OneCare back-up facility I saw no real need.
>>>>>>> However........... I'm no longer experimenting with Beta programmes
>>>>>>> and will therefore follow the Microsoft advice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I went to the "Windows XP Backup Made Easy site, had a quick read
>>>>>>> and decided to print it. I failed to select a "printer friendly"
>>>>>>> version ........... what was printed? Not the whole as a web page,
>>>>>>> but a single sheet with a Lady and a small window in front of her
>>>>>>> ..... above which was printed "I've been bitten".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any comment or ideas why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Steven L Umbach" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>>>>>> message newsqOdnVm-8JykzWreRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>> Digital signatures are used to verify that the file comes from a
>>>>>>> trusted publisher and can rule out that the file has been tampered
>>>>>>> with. The file must be signed by a certificate that was issued by a
>>>>>>> Certificate Authority that your computer trusts and be valid. You
>>>>>>> can see the CAs that your computer trusts in Internet
>>>>>>> Explorer/tools/content - certificates. However if the date of the
>>>>>>> certificate has expired it is not considered valid and you will get
>>>>>>> a warning message stating such which apparently is what you are
>>>>>>> seeing. I have no idea why these companies have not renewed their
>>>>>>> certificates. However I would not be that concerned about it as any
>>>>>>> company that values it's security will carefully secure it's signing
>>>>>>> certificates and revoke any issued certificates that they feel have
>>>>>>> been compromised. As always good backups of at least data files,
>>>>>>> ideally the System State also which includes registry backup, and
>>>>>>> possibly an image of the system drive is best practice to prevent
>>>>>>> undue hardship from any surprises that can include hardware
>>>>>>> lure. --- Steve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july14.mspx
>>>>>>> --- making backups on XP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/asr.mspx ---
>>>>>>> XP Automated System Recovery backup
>>>>>>> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I recently received this message (part only) from the Trend Micro
>>>>>>> Help Centre:-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for your email and the screenshot.
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>> Please ignore that Digital Signature and install and run the file
>>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really .......... I thought that's why warnings are given in the
>>>>>>> first place! Whilst I'm sure that, in that particular scenario, it
>>>>>>> was well-intentioned (and after having had the file checked by
>>>>>>> Sophos, I believe that there is nothing for me to be concerned
>>>>>>> about) it does leave me "wondering"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I must admit that I do not fully understand exactly how the
>>>>>>> Digital Signature system is supposed to work. I "expect" to see a
>>>>>>> Digital Signature which, when I check (say after downloading a
>>>>>>> programme from the Internet) to have a date which is current .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, (and as a "for instance") during my many re-installations
>>>>>>> of Windows XP since Christmas (7 in all now!) I discovered that in
>>>>>>> order to obtain Updates from Microsoft thereafter, I had to accept a
>>>>>>> Certificate which had a "out of date" signature. I did raise this
>>>>>>> with Microsoft, and was told that they were "aware of the problem"
>>>>>>> ............... and accept it anyway! I gather it has something to
>>>>>>> do with when the original "tool" was published and given its'
>>>>>>> Digital Signature, but I've always been sceptical about this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has just occured again when (now that my PC is, at last, free
>>>>>>> from Malware [ ??? ever the optomist!]) I attempted to join MSN - it
>>>>>>> required to "update" itself - and wants me to accept a sinature
>>>>>>> dated in 2004? (I haven't, yet!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Someone "out there" must surely be able to explain to me how the
>>>>>>> Digital Signature system works ......... or, perhaps, that it
>>>>>>> doesn't always work as one might expect! I'm willing to learn (but
>>>>>>> it's getting much harder to remember!).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>