I have a TV Wonder and I want to buy another one for another computer.
I am willing to buy the new PRO model but I am trying to figure out
what the significancant difference is between the new PRO and and old
TV wonder.

Looking at the Features / Specifications page it doesn't look like
much is different. And ATI doesn't post the drivers so I can't tell if
it uses a newer version of multimedia center then the old TV Wonder
PRO.

Does the new TV Wonder PRO use the latest version of media player?
Does it record at a higher quality then the old one? What else is new
and approved ?

thanks

pro = remote control I think


<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have a TV Wonder and I want to buy another one for another computer.
> I am willing to buy the new PRO model but I am trying to figure out
> what the significancant difference is between the new PRO and and old
> TV wonder.
>
> Looking at the Features / Specifications page it doesn't look like
> much is different. And ATI doesn't post the drivers so I can't tell if
> it uses a newer version of multimedia center then the old TV Wonder
> PRO.
>
> Does the new TV Wonder PRO use the latest version of media player?
> Does it record at a higher quality then the old one? What else is new
> and approved ?
>
> thanks

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have a TV Wonder and I want to buy another one for another computer.
> I am willing to buy the new PRO model but I am trying to figure out
> what the significancant difference is between the new PRO and and old
> TV wonder.
>
> Looking at the Features / Specifications page it doesn't look like
> much is different. And ATI doesn't post the drivers so I can't tell if
> it uses a newer version of multimedia center then the old TV Wonder
> PRO.
>
> Does the new TV Wonder PRO use the latest version of media player?
> Does it record at a higher quality then the old one? What else is new
> and approved ?
>
> thanks

I believe it will play live in stereo instead of mono and
it has a remote but still not time shifting though.

regards,
HornDog

"HornDog" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Xq-dnUvuPbIOtRKiRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have a TV Wonder and I want to buy another one for another computer.
> > I am willing to buy the new PRO model but I am trying to figure out
> > what the significancant difference is between the new PRO and and old
> > TV wonder.
> >
> > Looking at the Features / Specifications page it doesn't look like
> > much is different. And ATI doesn't post the drivers so I can't tell if
> > it uses a newer version of multimedia center then the old TV Wonder
> > PRO.
> >
> > Does the new TV Wonder PRO use the latest version of media player?
> > Does it record at a higher quality then the old one? What else is new
> > and approved ?
> >
> > thanks
>
> I believe it will play live in stereo instead of mono and
> it has a remote but still not time shifting though.

The TV Wonder (PCI) and TV Wonder Pro are both stereo. The TV Wonder VE is
mono. Both the TV Wonder VE and Pro are available with or without remote
control.

The TV Wonder Pro seems to have a completely new board design compared to
the non-Pro version, with a better tuner. It also supports Thru-View and
Video Soap.

- Daniel

According to the ATi website the non-Pro version does NOT have a stereo TV tuner.
--
Todd

You have confused the TV Wonder with the TV Wonder VE.

The VE version doesn't support stereo, doesn't have a S video plug and
doesn't support high recording quality. It is a card designed to watch
TV on your PC in mono and recorded for later viewing.

But my question was what is the difference between the TV Wonder ....
which does support all those things ..... and the TV Wonder PRO...
which is the new version of the TV Wonder.

From what I have picked up on reviews is that the only significant
difference is the ability to use the newest version = 8.x of media
manager, Glide Plus and The ability to recorde DVD quality at the same
level as the AIW cards. ..plus some presentation abilities..

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:23:19 GMT, "Todd" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>According to the ATi website the non-Pro version does NOT have a stereo TV tuner.

I have the TV wonder (not ve) and it is stereo.

Mike

"Todd" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:XcYjb.115530$6C4.51422@pd7tw1no...
> According to the ATi website the non-Pro version does NOT have a stereo TV
tuner.
> --
> Todd
>
>

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
> You have confused the TV Wonder with the TV Wonder VE.
>
> The VE version doesn't support stereo, doesn't have a S video plug and
> doesn't support high recording quality. It is a card designed to watch
> TV on your PC in mono and recorded for later viewing.
>
> But my question was what is the difference between the TV Wonder ....
> which does support all those things ..... and the TV Wonder PRO...
> which is the new version of the TV Wonder.
>
> From what I have picked up on reviews is that the only significant
> difference is the ability to use the newest version = 8.x of media
> manager, Glide Plus and The ability to recorde DVD quality at the same
> level as the AIW cards. ..plus some presentation abilities..


I believe (but don't know for sure) that it might use the Rage Theater
chip... thus thru-view. And the fact that ATI doesn't seem to be supporting
much in the way of driver updates for the old model.

I'd assume higher quality TV processing. There's a very noticeable
difference between the image produced by my TV Wonder and AIW 9700 (when
each is selected is primary tuner). I actually have a new AIW 9800 and TV
Wonder Pro waiting to be installed, but need a couple other parts before I
tear the PC apart. :-)

- Daniel

Well, then ATi does not provide accurate info on its site.
--
Todd

Yes it does, the TV Wonder has been discontinued and replaced with the pro.
The ve is still going as a cheap mono alternative.

Mike

"Todd" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:yMpkb.123500$9l5.30574@pd7tw2no...
> Well, then ATi does not provide accurate info on its site.
> --
> Todd
>
>