I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks

giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks

Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a
usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an
existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are
replying


Help us to help you:
http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm


..

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
> giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
>
> Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a
> usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an
> existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are
> replying
>
>
> Help us to help you:
> http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm
>
>
> .
>
>
Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD Card?"
Will resubmit under correct thread.

: >
: Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD
Card?"
: Will resubmit under correct thread.

Dont' change the subject lines of posts.

>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.

Not quite true.

OP wanted to partition an SD card and mistakenly used the term "kb" instead
of "mb" when referring to a size.

One of his responders asked if it was a typo and the responder got flak from
some idiot.


Gord



On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:56:57 -0500, EncinoMan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
>
>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.

"Gord Dibben" <gorddibbATshawDOTca> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
>
> Not quite true.
>
> OP wanted to partition an SD card and mistakenly used the term "kb"
> instead
> of "mb" when referring to a size.
>
> One of his responders asked if it was a typo and the responder got flak
> from
> some idiot.
>

But EncinoMan would never let that get in the way of his ****wittery.

>
> Gord
>
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:56:57 -0500, EncinoMan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
>>
>>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
>

"giddyup" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
>> giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
>>
>> Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a
>> usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an
>> existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are
>> replying
>>
>>
>> Help us to help you:
>> http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm
>>
>>
>> .
> Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD
> Card?"
> Will resubmit under correct thread.

You probably did, but if you changed the subject line (which it appears you
did) then it posts as a completely new topic.

"EncinoMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:15:25 -0700, Gord Dibben <gorddibbATshawDOTca>
> wrote:
>
>>>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
>>
>>Not quite true.
>>
>>OP wanted to partition an SD card and mistakenly used the term "kb"
>>instead
>>of "mb" when referring to a size.
>>
>>One of his responders asked if it was a typo and the responder got flak
>>from
>>some idiot.
>>
>>
>>Gord
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:56:57 -0500, EncinoMan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
>>>
>>>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
> And we were supposed to know this how? Considering none of what you
> have mentioned is in the post I was responding to?

Well, it seems others knew what he was on about, so you are just doing what
you do best. Being a ****wit.