Have you posted this in the Exchange newsgroup? I would recommend that since
OOA is specific to Exchange.
--
Kathleen Orland - MVP Outlook
Outlook Tips:
http://www.outlook-tips.net/
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
"(E-Mail Removed)" wrote:
> Hi, this is an old post. we have e2k7 sp1. did anyone get an answer
> for this ?
>
> Hi Guys/Girls,
>
> We have stumbled across a very interesting problem with the use of
> Outlook
> 2003 in an Exchange 2007 SP1environment. It seems to result in the Out
> Of Office
> assistant being out of sync between Outlook 2003 & OWA. We have approx
> 100
> users and I am getting more and more complaints with out of office
> replies
> being old and out of date.
>
>
> I have checked the 'Remote Domain' properties and made sure selected
> is
> 'Allow external out-of-office messages, and out-of-office messages set
> by
> Outlook 2003 or earlier clients or sent by Exchange Server 2003 or
> earlier
> servers'. However this option still has not helped.
>
>
> As a run through this is what happens:
>
>
> 1. Changed the out-of-office message within Outlook 2003 from older
> OOF to
> new date etc. (No rules are being used). Click OK.
> 2. Sent test e-mail to mail account and the OLD OOF is sent back to
> the
> sender.
>
>
> The only way I seem to get OWA and Outlook 2003 back in sync is to
> remove
> the text within OWA from the 'External' & 'Internal' out of office
> replies
> and then go back within Outlook 2003 and set the OOF again.
>
>
> I need to do the above process for each time an out of office is set.
> As I
> am sure you can appreciate it gets quite tiresome at times.
>
>
> If anyone knows of an incompatibility issue or resolution for this I
> would
> really appreciate your views and opinions. I hear that SP1 for
> Exchange 2007
> is due out any time soon so does anyone know if this also has fixes
> for the
> out of office? I have reviewed the notes for SP1 and it does not
> mention a
> lot of OWA updates.
>
>
> Any posts will be replied to extremely promptly as I would really like
> to
> get to the bottom of this issue.
>
>
> Many thanks in advance!
>