Gollner:
Did you resolve this?
.... Doug
"Gollner Günther" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1b7901c3869d$d0c98100$(E-Mail Removed)...
now i have resealed the Images and the problem still
persists, any ideas ?
>-----Original Message-----
>i'll try this today,
>
>if this is the problem, then i have a question:
>
>how should i make 10.000+ different resealed images,
>let's say on something similar to a cd-rom or a prom.
>(i can only write ONE time to the media, which takes
>about 30 minutes per media)
>
>the second problem is, the customers are running tests
>(crc checks, md5 hash) on the complete media, to make
>sure nothing is changed !(manipulated)
>
>when i start the PC'S one by one, delay about 5 sec
>(walking from on to another) it works. Only when i start
>all of the PC's the same time, most of the time (4 out
of
>5) this problem occurs. if i restart the bad PC's, they
>get a correct IP.
>
>and again there is NO Network Client on the PC, also no
>Domain, only TCP/IP protocol. i don't get duplicate
>Computernames, only duplicate ip.
>
>the network sniffer tells me a dhcp-request with an IP,
>which is different from the dhcp-offer for this MAC-
>address.
>
>There are no SID informations in DHCP-Packets, so how
can
>this make troubles ?
>How are operating systems without SID's getting DHCP
IP's?
>Why does MS don't use Computernames from DHCP ?
>What means DHCP Option 249, why only MS-DHCP recognizes
it
>(all others ignore it) ?
>
>Ex:
>
>PC 1: DHCP Discover
>PC 2: DHCP Discover
>DHCP offer: ip:1.2.3.4 -> PC1
>DHCP offer: ip:1.2.3.5 -> PC2(so PC2 should take
1.2.3.5)
>PC 1: DHCP Request ip:1.2.3.4
>DHCP ACK -> PC1
>PC 2: DHCP Request ip:1.2.3.4(but it requests th wrong)
>DHCP NACK -> PC2
>
>the MAC-Addresses in the Packets are for the correct PC.
>
>thx
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Doug's right. If they all have the same SID then
there's
>no surprise that
>>you're having networking problems. Try cloning the
>image, redeploy them and
>>see if that resolves the issue.
>>
>>Thanks
>>--
>>
>>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,
and
>confers no rights.
>>========================================================
=
>=
>>
>>
>>"Doug Hoeffel" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote
>in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Are these 10 pc's on a domain? If you don't reseal
>then all 10 have the
>>> same SID. I don't think this is a good thing to do
on
>a domain.
>>>
>>> I would reseal to change atleast the SID.
>>>
>>> HTH... Doug
>>> "Günther Gollner" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>message
>>> news:122de01c38416$1b093100$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> > no reseal because i run from writeprotected media
>with
>>> > ram overlay.
>>> > there is no Microsoft Client on XP only tcp/ip
>protocol,
>>> > so there shouldn't be a problem of same
>Computernames.
>>> >
>>> > only 2-3 of 12 PC's have this problem, all with the
>same
>>> > image. with leasetime set to 5 mins, after the 1st
>>> > refresh all PC's get different IP's.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >-----Original Message-----
>>> > >Have your machines been resealed, or are they all
>using
>>> > >the same identification? That will mess up your
>>> > >networking...
>>> > >
>>> > >>-----Original Message-----
>>> > >>we get duplicate IP's when we power up 10 PC's at
>the
>>> > >>same time (also the router which is the DHCP
>Server).
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Example DHCP Packets:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>1. PC: DHCP Discover
>>> > >>2. Router: DHCP Offer Client IP=192.111.111.5
>>> > >>3. PC: DHCP Request Client IP=192.111.111.7
>>> > >>4. Router: DHCP NAK
>>> > >>
>>> > >>so the XPE Client tries to get a different IP
than
>the
>>> > >>Server offers. Some of the PC's restart DHCP
>>> > >>communication and get a correct IP. But others
>simply
>>> > use
>>> > >>the requested wrong IP which is already used by a
>>> > >>different PC.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>When the lease is refreshed the PC's get and use
>>> > correct
>>> > >>IP's.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>We tried Linksys and Netgear Routers with the same
>>> > Result.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>.
>>> > >>
>>> > >.
>>> > >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>.
>
|