PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Development tool

 
 
Larry Waibel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
Larry,

Personaly I use XPP that share one volume on target machine. (1GB network) Then I build my image directly to network share from TD.

Regards,
Slobodan


"Larry Waibel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
> their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
> for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
> volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
> developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
> don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
> able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
> needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
> seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?aGFsIGtvcnN0ZWFk?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
Does "booting XP from the CD" mean booting WinPE? True it is slow but it's
hardly my biggest problem. I've done that and I've used BartPE because WinPE
doesn't support my GigE interfaces. As far as DOS/long names/share is
concerned, I haven't done all 3 but I have used a DOS-like/long name scenario
supported by the LFN open source package. In this case I made a bootable
Win98 startup Zip disk, added LFN, and had room to add the image and then
boot on the target. It is a slow and awkward procedure but I think it
illustrates the point that you simply need to improvise something that works
for you.

"Larry Waibel" wrote:

> What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
> their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
> for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
> volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
> developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
> don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
> able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
> needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
> seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Larry Waibel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
I don't have a Zip disk drive, just a floppy. I need a floppy that will boot,
support long file names, and be able to share the target disk out to an XP Pro
machine on the network.

In article <03D61CD9-3D75-47FB-8FF3-(E-Mail Removed)>, Hal korstead
wrote:
> From: hal korstead <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Subject: RE: Development tool
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:41:01 -0700
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
>
> Does "booting XP from the CD" mean booting WinPE? True it is slow but it's
> hardly my biggest problem. I've done that and I've used BartPE because WinPE
> doesn't support my GigE interfaces. As far as DOS/long names/share is
> concerned, I haven't done all 3 but I have used a DOS-like/long name scenario
> supported by the LFN open source package. In this case I made a bootable
> Win98 startup Zip disk, added LFN, and had room to add the image and then
> boot on the target. It is a slow and awkward procedure but I think it
> illustrates the point that you simply need to improvise something that works
> for you.
>
> "Larry Waibel" wrote:
>
> > What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
> > their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
> > for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
> > volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
> > developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
> > don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
> > able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
> > needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
> > seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!
> >
> >

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Larry Waibel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
Not sure I understand. My target just has a 256MB M-Systems disk that's not removable. How
do I get the output from TD from my development system to the target M-Systems disk when
there's nothing on it? Are you saying you boot XP Pro from a CD on the target and then
share out the target disk?

In article <OoOe#(E-Mail Removed)>, Slobodan Brcin (eMVP) wrote:
> From: "Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Subject: Re: Development tool
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:12:54 +0200
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
>
> Larry,
>
> Personaly I use XPP that share one volume on target machine. (1GB network) Then I build my

image directly to network share from TD.
>
> Regards,
> Slobodan
>
> "Larry Waibel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
> > their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
> > for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
> > volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
> > developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
> > don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
> > able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
> > needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
> > seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!
> >

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
Larry,

I said what I use for most of my developments and testing purposes.
If you have M-Systems uDOC device then you can plug it to dev machine, place files on it and them plug it back to target machine.

Or you can make small deployment XPe that will run from network and then move your image to target computer.
Or you can boot it from second disk. There are many options available depending on your computer configuration.

Regards,
Slobodan







"Larry Waibel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Not sure I understand. My target just has a 256MB M-Systems disk that's not removable. How
> do I get the output from TD from my development system to the target M-Systems disk when
> there's nothing on it? Are you saying you boot XP Pro from a CD on the target and then
> share out the target disk?
>
> In article <OoOe#(E-Mail Removed)>, Slobodan Brcin (eMVP) wrote:
> > From: "Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> > Subject: Re: Development tool
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:12:54 +0200
> > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
> >
> > Larry,
> >
> > Personaly I use XPP that share one volume on target machine. (1GB network) Then I build my

> image directly to network share from TD.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Slobodan
> >
> > "Larry Waibel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > What tool/mechanism do most people use for getting the built images over to
> > > their target? I've been using Remote Recover but Winternals charges $1500
> > > for the Administrator Pak and won't sell RR separately and won't do any
> > > volume discount or floating license. Paying that much for a bunch of
> > > developers when we only need a very tiny part of the Pak is ridiculous but I
> > > don't see any other good alternatives. Booting XP from the CD just to be
> > > able to share out the target to copy for is quite a long boot. All that's
> > > needed is a DOS boot that supports long file names and can share out to be
> > > seen by XP. Are there any alternatives? Thanks!
> > >

> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
gary.harvey@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2005
I zip the entire TD output tree into a self extracting archive and
extract it over the wire via winpe. Once I am happy with this, the self
extracting archive is written to the WinPe CD and called from there. It
removes any need for expensive third party cloning programmes. Let me
know if this methodology is of interest and I will provide you with
more details.

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?aGFsIGtvcnN0ZWFk?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Jun 2005
Take a look at http://www.drdos.net/faq/
The basics of long file names and networking are supported but will you be
able to share to XP Pro and fit it all on a floppy(s)? I have my doubts but
let us know if you succeed.

"Larry Waibel" wrote:

> I don't have a Zip disk drive, just a floppy. I need a floppy that will boot,
> support long file names, and be able to share the target disk out to an XP Pro
> machine on the network.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Larry Waibel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jun 2005
I'm not familiar with 'winpe' so not sure what you're describing but I am
interested in some more details; thanks!

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> From: "(E-Mail Removed)" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded
> Subject: Re: Development tool
> Date: 28 Jun 2005 07:55:49 -0700
>
> I zip the entire TD output tree into a self extracting archive and
> extract it over the wire via winpe. Once I am happy with this, the self
> extracting archive is written to the WinPe CD and called from there. It
> removes any need for expensive third party cloning programmes. Let me
> know if this methodology is of interest and I will provide you with
> more details.
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The right tool for Vista development in .Net 3.0 =?Utf-8?B?RGFsZQ==?= Microsoft Dot NET Framework 15 27th Feb 2007 04:58 PM
Graphical Development Tool C# Leann Microsoft ASP .NET 3 9th Jun 2005 09:01 AM
Which Tool for PPC/CE Development ? =?Utf-8?B?anVhbkBtc2RuQ29tcGFueS5jb20=?= Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 2 16th Mar 2005 12:34 AM
Development tool,Excel,GUI =?Utf-8?B?QnJpYW5H?= Microsoft Excel Misc 3 27th Dec 2004 02:05 PM
Development tool? Zanna Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 3 2nd Nov 2003 07:58 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.