PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Development for StrongArm/XScale/Mips

 
 
Edgard L. Riba
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Sep 2003
Hi,
I need to develop an application that will target the following 3 processors
(Pocket PC 2000 and 2002): StrongArm, XScale, and Mips.

The application will run on the following 4 industrial PDAs:
Symbol PDT 8146 (StrongArm and XScale)
PDT 8846 (XScale)
PPT 2846 (StrongARm)

Unitech PT930 (Mips)


If I develop an application using C# and the compact framework, do I need to
do anything special to target all these machines? Are there any caveats
to watch out for?

Best regards,
Edgard L. Riba


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alex Feinman [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Sep 2003
All Symbol platforms in this list are OK. Don't know much about Unitech,
but since it is CE 3.0 device, it really depends on whether it is Pocket PC
2000 (2002) or not.

"Edgard L. Riba" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Or%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I need to develop an application that will target the following 3

processors
> (Pocket PC 2000 and 2002): StrongArm, XScale, and Mips.
>
> The application will run on the following 4 industrial PDAs:
> Symbol PDT 8146 (StrongArm and XScale)
> PDT 8846 (XScale)
> PPT 2846 (StrongARm)
>
> Unitech PT930 (Mips)
>
>
> If I develop an application using C# and the compact framework, do I need

to
> do anything special to target all these machines? Are there any caveats
> to watch out for?
>
> Best regards,
> Edgard L. Riba
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Adam Goetz
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Sep 2003
The only gotcha that I can think of looking at that list is that, if you are
using platform specific things like barcode scanning, the Unitech will
require a different assembly etc to the Symbol devices.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Newton
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Sep 2003
I have been developing for the Unitech PT930 (MIPS) and the PT930SA
(StrongArm) now for about 18 months, BUT not in CF but the infamous
eVB.

These devices run Windows CE 3.0, not Pocket PC OS.

I would strongly advise against using the MIPS version as this is now
becoming obsolete, the StrongArm version is more robust,
(crashing-wise) and processes data a lot quicker too than the MIPS.

For development you will need to download the SDK's for either version
from the Unitech site: (eVB or eVC)

http://www.unitechnical.info/P_news.htm

To download you will need a username and password, this can be
assigned by Unitech's Technical Support e-mail here:
(E-Mail Removed)

This is a European address, so I'm not sure whether you need to
contact a site in your continent.

Hope this helps...

Paul Newton


"Adam Goetz" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> The only gotcha that I can think of looking at that list is that, if you are
> using platform specific things like barcode scanning, the Unitech will
> require a different assembly etc to the Symbol devices.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Edgard L. Riba
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Sep 2003
Thanks for the help.
Seems like it would be wise to work with only one brand...

Best regards,
Edgard L. Riba

"Edgard L. Riba" <(E-Mail Removed)> escribió en el mensaje
news:Or%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I need to develop an application that will target the following 3

processors
> (Pocket PC 2000 and 2002): StrongArm, XScale, and Mips.
>
> The application will run on the following 4 industrial PDAs:
> Symbol PDT 8146 (StrongArm and XScale)
> PDT 8846 (XScale)
> PPT 2846 (StrongARm)
>
> Unitech PT930 (Mips)
>
>
> If I develop an application using C# and the compact framework, do I need

to
> do anything special to target all these machines? Are there any caveats
> to watch out for?
>
> Best regards,
> Edgard L. Riba
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Newton
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Sep 2003
I don't agree!

Don't put all your eggs in one basket, ideally it would be good to
have any applications that you develop be able to run on 3 brands,
then if one of the brands cease trading you have another two to choose
from.



Paul Newton


"Edgard L. Riba" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<ulf7$(E-Mail Removed)>...
> Thanks for the help.
> Seems like it would be wise to work with only one brand...
>
> Best regards,
> Edgard L. Riba
>
> "Edgard L. Riba" <(E-Mail Removed)> escribió en el mensaje
> news:Or%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi,
> > I need to develop an application that will target the following 3

> processors
> > (Pocket PC 2000 and 2002): StrongArm, XScale, and Mips.
> >
> > The application will run on the following 4 industrial PDAs:
> > Symbol PDT 8146 (StrongArm and XScale)
> > PDT 8846 (XScale)
> > PPT 2846 (StrongARm)
> >
> > Unitech PT930 (Mips)
> >
> >
> > If I develop an application using C# and the compact framework, do I need

> to
> > do anything special to target all these machines? Are there any caveats
> > to watch out for?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Edgard L. Riba
> >
> >

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ginny Caughey [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Sep 2003
Edgard,

In addition to Alex's advice, the Symbol 8846 has the compact framework already
installed, but I don't believe the other Symbol devices do. (I am also not
familiar with the Unitech device.) Also be aware that the Symbol 2846 is a
PocketPC while the 8846 is a CE device, so the GUI will behave somewhat
differently even though the screens are the same size.
--
Ginny Caughey
Windows Embedded MVP

"Edgard L. Riba" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Or%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I need to develop an application that will target the following 3 processors
> (Pocket PC 2000 and 2002): StrongArm, XScale, and Mips.
>
> The application will run on the following 4 industrial PDAs:
> Symbol PDT 8146 (StrongArm and XScale)
> PDT 8846 (XScale)
> PPT 2846 (StrongARm)
>
> Unitech PT930 (Mips)
>
>
> If I develop an application using C# and the compact framework, do I need to
> do anything special to target all these machines? Are there any caveats
> to watch out for?
>
> Best regards,
> Edgard L. Riba
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trading Memory For MIPs? (PeteCresswell) Windows XP General 0 24th Jun 2009 07:07 PM
MIPS Programming psd99 General Discussion 3 21st Jul 2006 08:41 PM
CE.Net 4.10 StrongARM-based embedded device hangs at GDI Polyline API unexpectedly. Charles Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 1 2nd Aug 2004 07:22 AM
CAB - MIPS, SH3, ARM, ARMV4 Keith Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 0 20th Jul 2004 08:17 PM
Why CAB's for MIPS, SH3 in PocketPC-Project? Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 1 23rd Feb 2004 09:54 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.