Hi,

I use Outlook 2003 SP2. Is there any way I can find out if a specific e-mail
was sent using the "do not deliver before" option?

Thank you

Nat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I use Outlook 2003 SP2. Is there any way I can find out if a specific
> e-mail was sent using the "do not deliver before" option?

What type of account? At which point (on the sender side or the recipient
side) would you be looking for the evidence?
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

I am the recipient and would like to know if the delayed delivery function
was used by the sender.

"Brian Tillman" wrote:

> Nat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > I use Outlook 2003 SP2. Is there any way I can find out if a specific
> > e-mail was sent using the "do not deliver before" option?
>
> What type of account? At which point (on the sender side or the recipient
> side) would you be looking for the evidence?
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
>
>

Nat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I am the recipient and would like to know if the delayed delivery
> function was used by the sender.

You can certainly see delays if this is a message received from the
Internet. Although there's no way to determine the actual cause of the
delay, I'd think it reasonable to assume it was delayed delivery if there
were a significant difference between the Date header and the time stamp in
the first Received header, but that's not a guarantee.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

I think on Exchange networks the Sent field (as opposed to Received) gives
the game away.

Regards

Judy Gleeson
MVP Outlook
Trainer and Consultant

There are various articles about using Outlook here: www.judygleeson.com
Canberra, Australia


"Brian Tillman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Nat <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> I am the recipient and would like to know if the delayed delivery
>> function was used by the sender.
>
> You can certainly see delays if this is a message received from the
> Internet. Although there's no way to determine the actual cause of the
> delay, I'd think it reasonable to assume it was delayed delivery if there
> were a significant difference between the Date header and the time stamp
> in the first Received header, but that's not a guarantee.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]