I tried the same thing in Dreamweaver and once you detach a dwt, it leaves
the template data behind and simply removes the editable regions.
IMHO, an option to REMOVE the dwt would be a major useful feature for FP2003
or next version. There may be cases where DETACH is useful, but a REMOVE
function would be just as useful.
"microlinx" wrote:
> Before you even start adding dynamic templates, MAKE A BACKUP of your entire
> site. If you decide to change templates later, you may wind up with a mess.
>
> My Interactive buttons became corrupted, and I decided to change tempates.
>
> Once you detach a dynamic template, the template contents are ADDED to you
> editiable region. This is not what I expected and from a users viewpoint I
> see it as a major bug. Why would you intend for it to work this way?
>
> The strip.dwt method does work, but it also leaves behind empty tables once
> it is detached.
>
> The only way I can fix the mess I have now is to manually remove the top,
> side and bottom tables (on about 100 pages) that were left behind once I
> detached my dynamic template.
>
> Once you detach, then re-attach, you will end up with "nested" borders.
> Hardly a desireable function. I just switched to FP 2003 from 2000 and I'm
> not impressed with this "feature".
>
> Microsoft should look into this or please explain why it functions this way.
|