PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Design issue - how to handle document objects

 
 
night_writer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      5th Apr 2011
I need some advice from more experienced designers on how to handle
this issue. I am creating a data base of forms used by my company. In
addition to information on the form's usage, I would like have the
users be able to open the form if they want to, either to review it or
to actually fill it out and use it. There will be several thousand
documents in this data base.

I quickly found that putting forms in as objects makes the data base
size grow huge. It might be possible for the forms to be deposited in
a directory and linked to, but we are continually switching servers
around, and directories don't necessarily keep the same names.

One idea I had was to put the forms in a table on our SQL server and
just link to that table, but I'm wondering if that has its own set of
problems.

I have created a table with a few forms in my data base, just to try
to replicate what I might do with a linked table on the SQL server. I
would like to create a report with a link to the form object, but I
can't seem to figure out how to do that.

Any thoughts and advice would be helpful at this point. I'm open to
solutions.

Thanks!

Alice
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Access Developer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Apr 2011
"Forms" in Access are the screens with which the user interacts, but it
appears to me that you are using "forms" in a generic sense, as in paper
forms on which information is recorded in specific locations. Because you
cannot "create a database of paper forms", I would understand that you are
talking about storing _images_ of the paper forms, which would include the
text that is printed on each copy of the forms as well as the information or
data and would be a very inefficient way to handle your information and in
which the information in the image would not be searchable or directly
accessible via Access.

If that is correct, have you considered storing only the information or data
that a user would enter into the forms in records in your database, and
creating appropriate Access Forms (screens) and Reports to display the data
in a way that your users expect to see it? That way the headings, text, and
information only need be stored once (or twice if you have a Form _and_ a
Report for each of your company's forms) and the data stored for each
instance. An added benefit is that the actual data will be directly
accessible and searchable in Access.

If I have misunderstood, please post back here and explain.

In answer to your other question, using a server database, such as Microsoft
SQL Server, for your data store, and using Access to create the user
interface and 'programs' is very common. The development approach and
design techniques are a little different, but "little" is the operative
word. The majority of the paying work I've done with Access since 1993 has
been using ODBC-compliant server databases (sometimes but not necessarily
Microsoft SQL Server) for the datastore. But using a server DB for your
data store still would not make it a good idea to store images of each
instance of use of the forms... you will still want to store only the
information for each instance, and the headings, etc., in presenting that
data to the users.

Larry Linson
Microsoft Office Access MVP



"night_writer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:6223ddb6-c0d0-434d-bef2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I need some advice from more experienced designers on how to handle
> this issue. I am creating a data base of forms used by my company. In
> addition to information on the form's usage, I would like have the
> users be able to open the form if they want to, either to review it or
> to actually fill it out and use it. There will be several thousand
> documents in this data base.
>
> I quickly found that putting forms in as objects makes the data base
> size grow huge. It might be possible for the forms to be deposited in
> a directory and linked to, but we are continually switching servers
> around, and directories don't necessarily keep the same names.
>
> One idea I had was to put the forms in a table on our SQL server and
> just link to that table, but I'm wondering if that has its own set of
> problems.
>
> I have created a table with a few forms in my data base, just to try
> to replicate what I might do with a linked table on the SQL server. I
> would like to create a report with a link to the form object, but I
> can't seem to figure out how to do that.
>
> Any thoughts and advice would be helpful at this point. I'm open to
> solutions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alice



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
best way to handle null objects mp Microsoft C# .NET 15 16th Jan 2011 03:15 PM
What is the best way to handle path to different objects in the database. Tony Johansson Microsoft C# .NET 1 4th Jan 2011 12:35 AM
Reporting Component that can handle Objects? Joel DaBona Microsoft C# .NET 5 16th Feb 2007 03:15 PM
Class design issue: how to store unique inherited objects? J.J. Feminella Microsoft C# .NET 1 15th Jul 2004 10:37 PM
Design issue( creation of objects) =?Utf-8?B?c2Vhc2g=?= Microsoft C# .NET 2 3rd Apr 2004 06:46 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.