Hi,
I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific instance.
Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we need,
we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me in the
rigth direction?


Regards

-Martin

when deserialize(re-hydrate) an object from an XML stream it creates a new
instance of the type so therefore it will have a completely different hash
code (GetHashCode()). If you want to map this onto an already existing
instance of the type you will have to do this after the deserialization has
been compeleted.

HTH


Ollie Riches
"MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
instance.
> Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we
need,
> we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me in
the
> rigth direction?
>
>
> Regards
>
> -Martin
>
>

Why would you need it to be the same "instance"?

"MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
instance.
> Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we
need,
> we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me in
the
> rigth direction?
>
>
> Regards
>
> -Martin
>
>

Thank you Ollie,
Then the obvious question is: Is there a simple way map one instance of
an object onto another? Kind of a copy operator....

Thank you again.

-Martin

"Ollie Riches" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Ou$(E-Mail Removed)...
> when deserialize(re-hydrate) an object from an XML stream it creates a new
> instance of the type so therefore it will have a completely different hash
> code (GetHashCode()). If you want to map this onto an already existing
> instance of the type you will have to do this after the deserialization
> has
> been compeleted.
>
> HTH
>
>
> Ollie Riches
> "MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi,
>> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
> instance.
>> Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we
> need,
>> we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me in
> the
>> rigth direction?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -Martin
>>
>>
>
>

MS have created an interface in the .Net framework called 'ICloneable' that
is a pattern for copying an instance of a class and returing the new
instance.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...us/cpref/html/
frlrfsystemicloneableclasstopic.asp

HTH

Ollie Riches

All you have to do is impletm "MP"
<martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> wrote in message
news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thank you Ollie,
> Then the obvious question is: Is there a simple way map one instance
of
> an object onto another? Kind of a copy operator....
>
> Thank you again.
>
> -Martin
>
> "Ollie Riches" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:Ou$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > when deserialize(re-hydrate) an object from an XML stream it creates a
new
> > instance of the type so therefore it will have a completely different
hash
> > code (GetHashCode()). If you want to map this onto an already existing
> > instance of the type you will have to do this after the deserialization
> > has
> > been compeleted.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> >
> > Ollie Riches
> > "MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> Hi,
> >> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
> > instance.
> >> Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we
> > need,
> >> we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me in
> > the
> >> rigth direction?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> -Martin
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

I believe it's impossible to do so.
"MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific instance.
> Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really what we
> need, we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone point me
> in the rigth direction?
>
>
> Regards
>
> -Martin
>

Well.... I just figured it out. Now, I just need to get this working with
remoting.

-Martin
"daiyue" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OQWX%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I believe it's impossible to do so.
> "MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address>
> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi,
>> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
>> instance. Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really
>> what we need, we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone
>> point me in the rigth direction?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -Martin
>>
>
>

MP,

How did you do it? I need to do the same thing.

Thanks,

John

---------------
"MP" wrote:

> Well.... I just figured it out. Now, I just need to get this working with
> remoting.
>
> -Martin
> "daiyue" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:OQWX%(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I believe it's impossible to do so.
> > "MP" <martin.pare@I_Will_Not_Give_You_My_Address>
> > �´Èë�û�¢�ÂÎÅ:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> Hi,
> >> I would like to be able to deserialize a stream to a specific
> >> instance. Deserialize returns me a new instances and that is not really
> >> what we need, we need to deserialized to an existing instance. Can anyone
> >> point me in the rigth direction?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> -Martin
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>