PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Deploying Access 2002 Runtime

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Z2x5bm5n?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jul 2007
I'm new to this and somewhat concerned about deployment of Access 2002
application using packaging wizard. Simple app, nothing fancy.

How vulnerable will I be to customers installing the runtime on PC's with
different Access versions, older or newer?

Is it necessary to restrict to certain versions, i.e. Access 2000 or greater..

Is there a benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format?

Is is necessary to use an installation product like SageKey instead of
Packaging Wizard?

Thanks in advance


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alex Dybenko
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Jul 2007
Hi,
best approach - is to install runtime only when access is not installed.
Unfortunately you can't check this with PDW, so you have to ask customers if
they have any access version installed. with SageKey scripts and
installation system like Wise you can check if user has access installed (by
querying registry keys) and then install runtime when necessary

benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format - is that it can run on any
access version from 2000

--
Best regards,
___________
Alex Dybenko (MVP)
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
http://www.PointLtd.com


"glynng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2C87BEDC-4BDC-41E3-B53C-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm new to this and somewhat concerned about deployment of Access 2002
> application using packaging wizard. Simple app, nothing fancy.
>
> How vulnerable will I be to customers installing the runtime on PC's with
> different Access versions, older or newer?
>
> Is it necessary to restrict to certain versions, i.e. Access 2000 or
> greater..
>
> Is there a benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format?
>
> Is is necessary to use an installation product like SageKey instead of
> Packaging Wizard?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?U3RldmUgSmVuc2Vu?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Aug 2007
Hello, Alex
Related to this question - I have an app using Access XP that is distributed
with a setup option 'complete' or 'database only'. Complete is for users
without Access installed. Problem is, if the user has a newer version of
Access (2003 or 2007), the setup will not run the database-only option. It
is apparently looking for Access XP and only that version will do. How can I
change it to install just the mde if there is a later full version of Access?
This was created, BTW, with the setup wizard in XP developer tools.

"Alex Dybenko" wrote:

> Hi,
> best approach - is to install runtime only when access is not installed.
> Unfortunately you can't check this with PDW, so you have to ask customers if
> they have any access version installed. with SageKey scripts and
> installation system like Wise you can check if user has access installed (by
> querying registry keys) and then install runtime when necessary
>
> benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format - is that it can run on any
> access version from 2000
>
> --
> Best regards,
> ___________
> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
> http://www.PointLtd.com
>
>
> "glynng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:2C87BEDC-4BDC-41E3-B53C-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I'm new to this and somewhat concerned about deployment of Access 2002
> > application using packaging wizard. Simple app, nothing fancy.
> >
> > How vulnerable will I be to customers installing the runtime on PC's with
> > different Access versions, older or newer?
> >
> > Is it necessary to restrict to certain versions, i.e. Access 2000 or
> > greater..
> >
> > Is there a benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format?
> >
> > Is is necessary to use an installation product like SageKey instead of
> > Packaging Wizard?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Alex Dybenko
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Aug 2007
Hi Steve,
as I wrote - best is to use installation system, there are some free:
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2006/06/...on-system.html
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2005/03/...nstallers.html

also you can consider using Access 2007 PDW to build setup for 2007
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2007/06/...e-is-here.html

--
Best regards,
___________
Alex Dybenko (MVP)
http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
http://www.PointLtd.com


"Steve Jensen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:02F24FF8-06F6-4255-8C7A-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello, Alex
> Related to this question - I have an app using Access XP that is
> distributed
> with a setup option 'complete' or 'database only'. Complete is for users
> without Access installed. Problem is, if the user has a newer version of
> Access (2003 or 2007), the setup will not run the database-only option.
> It
> is apparently looking for Access XP and only that version will do. How
> can I
> change it to install just the mde if there is a later full version of
> Access?
> This was created, BTW, with the setup wizard in XP developer tools.
>
> "Alex Dybenko" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> best approach - is to install runtime only when access is not installed.
>> Unfortunately you can't check this with PDW, so you have to ask customers
>> if
>> they have any access version installed. with SageKey scripts and
>> installation system like Wise you can check if user has access installed
>> (by
>> querying registry keys) and then install runtime when necessary
>>
>> benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format - is that it can run on any
>> access version from 2000
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> ___________
>> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
>> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
>> http://www.PointLtd.com
>>
>>
>> "glynng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:2C87BEDC-4BDC-41E3-B53C-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > I'm new to this and somewhat concerned about deployment of Access 2002
>> > application using packaging wizard. Simple app, nothing fancy.
>> >
>> > How vulnerable will I be to customers installing the runtime on PC's
>> > with
>> > different Access versions, older or newer?
>> >
>> > Is it necessary to restrict to certain versions, i.e. Access 2000 or
>> > greater..
>> >
>> > Is there a benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format?
>> >
>> > Is is necessary to use an installation product like SageKey instead of
>> > Packaging Wizard?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> >

>>
>>


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?U3RldmUgSmVuc2Vu?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Aug 2007
Alex, this is an Access XP application. I'm not sure it can even be upgraded
to 2007.

"Alex Dybenko" wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> as I wrote - best is to use installation system, there are some free:
> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2006/06/...on-system.html
> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2005/03/...nstallers.html
>
> also you can consider using Access 2007 PDW to build setup for 2007
> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com/2007/06/...e-is-here.html
>
> --
> Best regards,
> ___________
> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
> http://www.PointLtd.com
>
>
> "Steve Jensen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:02F24FF8-06F6-4255-8C7A-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hello, Alex
> > Related to this question - I have an app using Access XP that is
> > distributed
> > with a setup option 'complete' or 'database only'. Complete is for users
> > without Access installed. Problem is, if the user has a newer version of
> > Access (2003 or 2007), the setup will not run the database-only option.
> > It
> > is apparently looking for Access XP and only that version will do. How
> > can I
> > change it to install just the mde if there is a later full version of
> > Access?
> > This was created, BTW, with the setup wizard in XP developer tools.
> >
> > "Alex Dybenko" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> best approach - is to install runtime only when access is not installed.
> >> Unfortunately you can't check this with PDW, so you have to ask customers
> >> if
> >> they have any access version installed. with SageKey scripts and
> >> installation system like Wise you can check if user has access installed
> >> (by
> >> querying registry keys) and then install runtime when necessary
> >>
> >> benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format - is that it can run on any
> >> access version from 2000
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> ___________
> >> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
> >> http://alexdyb.blogspot.com
> >> http://www.PointLtd.com
> >>
> >>
> >> "glynng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:2C87BEDC-4BDC-41E3-B53C-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > I'm new to this and somewhat concerned about deployment of Access 2002
> >> > application using packaging wizard. Simple app, nothing fancy.
> >> >
> >> > How vulnerable will I be to customers installing the runtime on PC's
> >> > with
> >> > different Access versions, older or newer?
> >> >
> >> > Is it necessary to restrict to certain versions, i.e. Access 2000 or
> >> > greater..
> >> >
> >> > Is there a benefit to distribute in Access 2000 format?
> >> >
> >> > Is is necessary to use an installation product like SageKey instead of
> >> > Packaging Wizard?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RE-DEPLOYING ACCESS RUNTIME Glint Microsoft Access 5 22nd Feb 2009 02:36 PM
Deploying Access 2007 Runtime-Based Solutions Robbo Microsoft Access 13 15th Jan 2009 01:05 AM
Deploying Access 2007 Application w/ Runtime kagard@gmail.com Microsoft Access 9 27th Nov 2007 04:41 AM
deploying access xp runtime =?Utf-8?B?c2o=?= Microsoft Access 1 8th Feb 2006 03:49 PM
Deploying Access runtime from XP to ME and 98 =?Utf-8?B?c2Jq?= Windows XP Setup 0 22nd Dec 2003 10:01 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.