#2 is probably the least troublesome. If you use #1, users may need to remember to invite the diary as a resource.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> We have recently migrated from GroupWise 6 to Exchange 2003 using
> Outlook 2003 SP2 Clients.
>
> We have a number of departments which wish to operate a departmental
> diary. The method of operation should be as follows:
>
> All users in the department can schedule appointments into the diary.
> All appointments should be auto accepted (as tentative if need be) and
> as such should appear in the diary automatically without the
> appointment being opened or previewed in the reading pane.
> All users shoud be able to open the departmental diary as a shared
> calendar and see all the appointments
>
> (This worked in GroupWise - every appointment sent to a user (the
> department diary user) was automatically shown in the diary as a
> tentative appointment.)
>
> The reasoning behind this is that the diaries are being used to record
> dates of important events that all members of the department should be
> able to see but do not want appearing in all their individual diaries.
> They also do not want to have to have someone administer the diary by
> opening and accepting appointments and it does not matter if two
> appointments conflict.
>
> Looking at the options:
>
> 1) Set up the diary as a resource and turn on autoaccept. Would this
> work (even though the requirement of a departmental diary is not
> really a resource). Does this make the scheduling of the appointment
> more complicated?
>
> 2) Make the diary a public folder - would this then work?
>
> 3) Setup the Diary user with a rule or script to auto accept
> appointments - can you do this and if so any pointers to the scripts
> and how they should be assigned.
>
> 4) Any other thoughts to achive this?
>
> All help greatly appreciated.
>
> Al Patch
>