Once more I have to say: Deleting ntbackup log files makes no difference to
the operation of ntbackup. The damage was either in the registry or by you
deleting some other files too.
There have been numerous discussions in this newsgroup about registry
cleaners. Some swear by them an all of these, without exception, claim that
their system runs faster. However, none of them, again without exception,
have ever run a benchmark test that could be repeated by other people, to
support their claim. Reminds me of the days when I was young and foolish: I
would swear that my car ran faster and smoother when I added a certain
expensive engine additive/lubricant. It didn't . . .
About your concern of losing data: There are two groups of people - those
who back up their imprtant files regularly and those who don't. Over time
all those in the second group will migrate to the first group. The
transition can be extremely painful. A 2.5" disk in an external USB case is
a low-cost but highly effective backup medium. Time to think . . .
"Stephen Ford" <stephen_ford_NO_@_SPAM_uwclub.net> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I restored the registry from this morning (Uniblue) and rolled back to
>yesterday's shutdown and it looks like it's working.
>
> In the process I read up on setting a restore point. Heart-in-mouth but I
> think it could be OK. I was worried about loosing data just as much as
> damaging the system config.
>
> I discovered to my horror that I can't use NTbackup to restore so can't
> use its filename wildcard option. And, I can't use Win Backup to restore
> files on a wild card likewise and have to know what files I want to
> restore. But if I've deleted on a wildcard I wouldn't know what files have
> been deleted so basically I'm stuffed if trying to restore files deleted
> with a wildcard. I didn't realise that !
>
> I'm tempted to think this was my fault and not Uniblue, but I am doubly
> cautious now. My experience until this incident, and that has been for
> about 13months of use, has been that the PC appears to run much faster
> with the registry clean. I take on board your comment and note that I
> might be closer to a problem with cleaning the registry than I realise.
> Perhaps I've been lucky so I will keep what you say in mind.
>
> Thanks for your help. Much appreciated.
>
> Stephen
>
> "Pegasus [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%234$%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Since Windows System Restore is fully reversible (guaranteed!), this
>> would be my preferred option.
>>
>>
>> "Stephen Ford" <stephen_ford_NO_@_SPAM_uwclub.net> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Tried running in Safe Mode with the result below. I've never rolled back
>>> but the system is set up with maximum disc space so it could work.
>>> Should I restore the registry with the cleaner or let the roll-back do
>>> it?
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> Backup Status
>>> Operation: Backup
>>> Active backup destination: File
>>> Media name: "Backup-PC03-Data-Norm-20090920.bkf created 20/09/2009 at
>>> 18:46"
>>>
>>> Error returned while creating the volume shadow copy:Catastrophic
>>> failure
>>> Aborting Backup.
>>> ----------------------
>>> The operation did not successfully complete.
>>
>>
>
>
|