Since Friday - when I allowed Windows 2000 to automatically install
available updates - I have been receiving a sporadic message:

"Windows was unable to save all the data for the file
\Device\HarddiskVolume3\$mft. The data has been lost. This error may be
caused by a failure of your computer hardware or network connection. Please
try to save this file elsewhere."

Normally when this message appears, the second drive [] disappears and
only reappears on a system Shutdown. This D drive is a physical second drive
and NOT a partition. All has been working fine until these updates were
installed. This may be purely coincidence, but as the system has been
working relatively trouble free for the last couple of years I was wondering
if it was linked, or is it a hard disk failure?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance
Paul.

There really isn't anything in the updates that would cause a delay write
failure. Those are typically hardware related. I would check the cables on
that drive and make sure that the termination is good. Also, run chkdsk on
that volume and see if it finds any errors, those last ones were within the
MFT which isn't where you want delay write failed.

--
Joseph W. Conway, MCSE
Windows 9x/NT/2000/XP/2003 Server Group

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Paul Sutton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OQSa%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Since Friday - when I allowed Windows 2000 to automatically install
> available updates - I have been receiving a sporadic message:
>
> "Windows was unable to save all the data for the file
> \Device\HarddiskVolume3\$mft. The data has been lost. This error may be
> caused by a failure of your computer hardware or network connection.
Please
> try to save this file elsewhere."
>
> Normally when this message appears, the second drive [] disappears and
> only reappears on a system Shutdown. This D drive is a physical second
drive
> and NOT a partition. All has been working fine until these updates were
> installed. This may be purely coincidence, but as the system has been
> working relatively trouble free for the last couple of years I was
wondering
> if it was linked, or is it a hard disk failure?
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Paul.
>
>
>