Defs #5709 were released today.

Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP

Sorry. I was late to the parrty.

Ron


"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Defs #5709 were released today.
>
> Ron Chamberlin
> MS-MVP
>

Beware the ides of unins000.exe with these definitions.

NS Keylogger is the ID--and so far it seems to be a false positive.

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry. I was late to the parrty.
>
> Ron
>
>
> "Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Defs #5709 were released today.
>>
>> Ron Chamberlin
>> MS-MVP
>>
>
>

Which is an interesting concern... If something is
determined to be a false/positive, what is the expected
turn-around for corrected definitions? This could have
some ramifications if the fix didn't come out until the
next regular release... Thanks!

RandyB

>-----Original Message-----
>Beware the ides of unins000.exe with these definitions.
>
>NS Keylogger is the ID--and so far it seems to be a false
positive.
>
>--
>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
>"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)
m...
>> Sorry. I was late to the parrty.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>> "Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>>
news:(E-Mail Removed)
m...
>>> Defs #5709 were released today.
>>>
>>> Ron Chamberlin
>>> MS-MVP
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>

RandyB wrote:
> Which is an interesting concern... If something is
> determined to be a false/positive, what is the expected
> turn-around for corrected definitions? This could have
> some ramifications if the fix didn't come out until the
> next regular release... Thanks!

Hi

You must probably install this app again if you dont mark
this with ignore after scanning. I dont know what default
action is. I removed Spywareblaster a month ago and
MSAS is doing this protection instead.

Javacool have answered within DLS reports forum

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13231635

--
plun

Keep watching. 5711 is available now, but early reports apparently show the
same issue--but stay tuned--this needs careful testing--the version number
indications within the program are not reliable.

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"RandyB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:124001c54772$6ec58750$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Which is an interesting concern... If something is
> determined to be a false/positive, what is the expected
> turn-around for corrected definitions? This could have
> some ramifications if the fix didn't come out until the
> next regular release... Thanks!
>
> RandyB
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Beware the ides of unins000.exe with these definitions.
>>
>>NS Keylogger is the ID--and so far it seems to be a false
> positive.
>>
>>--
>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>>"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)
> m...
>>> Sorry. I was late to the parrty.
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>>
>>> "Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message
>>>
> news:(E-Mail Removed)
> m...
>>>> Defs #5709 were released today.
>>>>
>>>> Ron Chamberlin
>>>> MS-MVP
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>

I'm not sure what is going on. I've tested on my machine with 5711, and the
false positive, which I did see with 5709 is now gone.

However, there are at least two different reports here of the false positive
with 5711 definitions. Since the version number as displayed by the program
is notoriously erratic, I'm checking further.

Here is what 5711 looks like on my machine:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
04/21/2005 12:13 AM 2,309,022 gcThreatAuditScanData.gcd
04/22/2005 06:46 PM 1,320,692 gcThreatAuditThreatData.gcd

Detailed File Analysis
Display name: gcThreatAuditThreatData.gcd
Name: gcThreatAuditThreatData.gcd
Publisher: Unspecified
Path: D:\Program Files\Microsoft AntiSpyware\gcThreatAuditThreatData.gcd
Size: 1320692 bytes
Create date: Friday April 15, 2005
Access date: Saturday April 23, 2005
Modified date: Friday April 22, 2005

MD5: b14f9714dec123e0194f7febd9d09c57

Detailed File Analysis
Display name: gcThreatAuditScanData.gcd
Name: gcThreatAuditScanData.gcd
Publisher: Unspecified
Path: D:\Program Files\Microsoft AntiSpyware\gcThreatAuditScanData.gcd
Size: 2309022 bytes
Create date: Friday April 15, 2005
Access date: Saturday April 23, 2005
Modified date: Thursday April 21, 2005

MD5: 71790386817e73328e9cb157119e01cd

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Bill Sanderson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Keep watching. 5711 is available now, but early reports apparently show
> the same issue--but stay tuned--this needs careful testing--the version
> number indications within the program are not reliable.
>
> --
> FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
> http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
> "RandyB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:124001c54772$6ec58750$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Which is an interesting concern... If something is
>> determined to be a false/positive, what is the expected
>> turn-around for corrected definitions? This could have
>> some ramifications if the fix didn't come out until the
>> next regular release... Thanks!
>>
>> RandyB
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>Beware the ides of unins000.exe with these definitions.
>>>
>>>NS Keylogger is the ID--and so far it seems to be a false
>> positive.
>>>
>>>--
>>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>
>>>"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> message
>>>news:(E-Mail Removed)
>> m...
>>>> Sorry. I was late to the parrty.
>>>>
>>>> Ron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> message
>>>>
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)
>> m...
>>>>> Defs #5709 were released today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron Chamberlin
>>>>> MS-MVP
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>
>