PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Defragging didn't change defrag report

 
 
Roger K
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007
I defragged my C drive (80GB with 27GB free). I used "defrag -v" from the
cmd prompt in Safe Mode, and the reported status on starting was Total
fragmentation 11%, File fragmentation 23%. The process took 5 hours+ .

Afterwards when I rechecked using "defrag -a" the report said that the
fragmentation was exactly the same.

I'll rerun the defrag tonight, but can anyone suggest the reason for no
change in frag level afterwards?

OS is Windows XP Home +SP2.

TIA


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
FreeComputerConsultant.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007
If you're real hung up about actual stats, the built in defrag program
pales compared to 3rd party ones you can buy; like Diskkeeper.

There are unmovable files that will hinder defrag also.

Most are content with just letting defrag do its thing via the GUI
interface and let it go at that.

www.FreeComputerConsultant.com

Roger K wrote:
> I defragged my C drive (80GB with 27GB free). I used "defrag -v" from the
> cmd prompt in Safe Mode, and the reported status on starting was Total
> fragmentation 11%, File fragmentation 23%. The process took 5 hours+ .
>
> Afterwards when I rechecked using "defrag -a" the report said that the
> fragmentation was exactly the same.
>
> I'll rerun the defrag tonight, but can anyone suggest the reason for no
> change in frag level afterwards?
>
> OS is Windows XP Home +SP2.
>
> TIA
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Gerry Cornell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007
Roger

Save the Report after running Disk Defragmenter as a word or txt file
and post a copy here if you still get an unsatisfactory result.


--

Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Roger K wrote:
> I defragged my C drive (80GB with 27GB free). I used "defrag -v"
> from the cmd prompt in Safe Mode, and the reported status on
> starting
> was Total fragmentation 11%, File fragmentation 23%. The process
> took 5 hours+ .
> Afterwards when I rechecked using "defrag -a" the report said that
> the fragmentation was exactly the same.
>
> I'll rerun the defrag tonight, but can anyone suggest the reason for
> no change in frag level afterwards?
>
> OS is Windows XP Home +SP2.
>
> TIA


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?dXNhc21h?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007
Try running it in Safe Mode to see if it works better. Or, try another third
party tool to get more defragmentation.

- John

"Roger K" wrote:

> I defragged my C drive (80GB with 27GB free). I used "defrag -v" from the
> cmd prompt in Safe Mode, and the reported status on starting was Total
> fragmentation 11%, File fragmentation 23%. The process took 5 hours+ .
>
> Afterwards when I rechecked using "defrag -a" the report said that the
> fragmentation was exactly the same.
>
> I'll rerun the defrag tonight, but can anyone suggest the reason for no
> change in frag level afterwards?
>
> OS is Windows XP Home +SP2.
>
> TIA
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
John Butler
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007
I support the suggestions of the preious psoters. get a good defragger, the
native windows defrag is near useless. The best one i know at present is
Perfect Diskv 8 [by Raxco]
"usasma" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:30CB84F7-FCCF-41A5-95BC-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Try running it in Safe Mode to see if it works better. Or, try another
> third
> party tool to get more defragmentation.
>
> - John
>
> "Roger K" wrote:
>
>> I defragged my C drive (80GB with 27GB free). I used "defrag -v" from
>> the
>> cmd prompt in Safe Mode, and the reported status on starting was Total
>> fragmentation 11%, File fragmentation 23%. The process took 5 hours+ .
>>
>> Afterwards when I rechecked using "defrag -a" the report said that the
>> fragmentation was exactly the same.
>>
>> I'll rerun the defrag tonight, but can anyone suggest the reason for no
>> change in frag level afterwards?
>>
>> OS is Windows XP Home +SP2.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Roger K
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2007

"John Butler" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I support the suggestions of the preious psoters. get a good defragger,
>the native windows defrag is near useless. The best one i know at present
>is Perfect Diskv 8 [by Raxco]
> "usasma" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:30CB84F7-FCCF-41A5-95BC-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Try running it in Safe Mode to see if it works better. Or, try another
>> third
>> party tool to get more defragmentation.
>>
>> - John
>>


Thanks everyone for the advice. I've downloaded a trial copy of Perfect
Disk 8. Sounds like a good idea so I'll give it try.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defrag not defragging meowkatt2002 Microsoft Dot NET 2 9th Sep 2009 11:05 PM
defrag not defragging sanginesio Windows XP Help 1 23rd Sep 2006 03:11 AM
How do I insert a new field in a report - I didn't set up the rep =?Utf-8?B?VFZDRiBDaHVyY2g=?= Microsoft Access Reports 1 18th May 2005 05:59 PM
Why Save? I Didn't Change Anything Smart-Alex Microsoft Frontpage 2 18th Oct 2004 06:25 PM
Defragging or Defragging-Related Tools Ben Alias Freeware 0 29th Sep 2004 07:50 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 PM.