I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G hard
drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4 hours,
showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work. Extrapolating the
first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully defrag. Does that sound
reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time required? Thanks for your
feedback.

That depends. If you've never defragged your hard drive it could take as
long as it has because the defrag is cleaning up the mess. If you've
periodically defragged then the time could be shorter. So, which is it?
Never or periodically? But, you're right, the time does seem excessive.

"JW" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G hard
> drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4 hours,
> showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work. Extrapolating the
> first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully defrag. Does that sound
> reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time required? Thanks for your
> feedback.
>

Time seems way too long, it could be your drive has dropped back to PIO mode
and is no longer running at Ultra DMA speeds.
Also the amount of remaining "Free space" could be low, how much free space
is available?

Download HD Tune, provides drive mode PIO/DMA info (click on the 'Info' tab)
and has an option to test your drive.
http://www.hdtune.com/

Also SpeedFan has an online analysis feature for hard drives.
http://www.almico.com/speedfan.php

JS

"JW" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G hard
> drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4 hours,
> showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work. Extrapolating the
> first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully defrag. Does that sound
> reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time required? Thanks for your
> feedback.
>

Comment at the bottom

--
'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to
take everything you have.' ........ Thomas Jefferson
"JW" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G hard
> drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4 hours,
> showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work. Extrapolating the
> first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully defrag. Does that sound
> reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time required? Thanks for your
> feedback.
>

On the subject of defragmentation, the folks who provide the excellent
CrapCleaner program (CCleaner) also offer a defragmenter, "Defraggler." Has
anyone tried it?

Ken Bland

"VanguardLH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Justin Thyme" in <news:g46a1g$o2$(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Comment at the bottom
>
> But there is no comment at the bottom. Why? Because you inserted the
> sigdash line at the top so everything afterward was part of your
> signature. The sigdash delimiter ends the body of your post.

I understand.

Trying once more.

On the subject of defragmentation, the folks who provide the excellent
CrapCleaner program (CCleaner) also offer a defragmenter, "Defraggler." Has
anyone tried it?

Ken Bland

JW

Select Start, All Programs, Accessories, System Tools, Disk CleanUp to
Empty your Recycle Bin and Remove Temporary Internet Files. Also select
Start, All Programs, accessories, System Tools, Disk CleanUp, More
Options, System Restore and remove all but the latest System Restore
point. Now try running Disk Defragmenter.


--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



JW wrote:
> I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G
> hard drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4
> hours, showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work.
> Extrapolating the first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully
> defrag. Does that sound reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time
> required? Thanks for your feedback.

"Justin Thyme" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:g46be7$6fe$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "VanguardLH" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> "Justin Thyme" in <news:g46a1g$o2$(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> Comment at the bottom
>>
>> But there is no comment at the bottom. Why? Because you inserted the
>> sigdash line at the top so everything afterward was part of your
>> signature. The sigdash delimiter ends the body of your post.
>
> I understand.
>
> Trying once more.
>
> On the subject of defragmentation, the folks who provide the excellent
> CrapCleaner program (CCleaner) also offer a defragmenter, "Defraggler."
> Has
> anyone tried it?
>
> Ken Bland
>

check here http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showforum=19



--

Xandros

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:21:46 -0600, "Justin Thyme"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Comment at the bottom

Yes ; it works just like any other .

这是新加的空白文章1，可以在UBB可视化编辑器中，添加和修改文章内容&#12290


--
rstu211

Maybe you dont have enough free space? Did you run a diskcleanup befor
the defrag? The built in tool does take very long if you are defraggin
for the first time. You could try one of the third party tools tha
complete the task faster. Some defrag even with much less than th
minimum free space requirement.





Gerry;3145475 Wrote:
> JW
>
> Select Start, All Programs, Accessories, System Tools, Disk CleanUp to
> Empty your Recycle Bin and Remove Temporary Internet Files. Als
> select
> Start, All Programs, accessories, System Tools, Disk CleanUp, More
> Options, System Restore and remove all but the latest System Restore
> point. Now try running Disk Defragmenter.
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Gerry
> ~~~~
> FCA
> Stourport, England
> Enquire, plan and execute
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> JW wrote:-
> I'm running Windows XP Pro SP2. I ran the defrag analysis on my 57G
> hard drive and got a recommendation to defrag. I stopped it after 4
> hours, showing only 10% complete, so that I could do some work.
> Extrapolating the first 10%, that's almost two 24 hour days to fully
> defrag. Does that sound reasonable? Is the benefit worth the time
> required? Thanks for your feedback.


--
doodle