PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

DEFRAG (greeen bits)

 
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th May 2008
At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green
(unmovable) stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do about
this? I like to keep things optimised.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
philo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th May 2008

"John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Wuh_j.7935$(E-Mail Removed)2...
> At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green
> (unmovable) stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do about
> this? I like to keep things optimised.
>
>



Nothing to worry about...



 
Reply With Quote
 
db.·.. >
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th May 2008
you can do more
defrag with a freeware
from microsoft.com
called pagedefrag.

--

db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>

"John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Wuh_j.7935$(E-Mail Removed)2...
> At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green (unmovable)
> stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do about this? I like to
> keep things optimised.
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Gerry
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th May 2008
John

I would be interested in seeing a Disk Defragmenter report. Open Disk
Defragmenter and click on Analyse. Select View Report and
click on Save As and Save. Now find VolumeC.txt in your My Documents
Folder and post a copy. Do this before running Disk Defragmenter as it
is more informative.

--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



John wrote:
> At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green
> (unmovable) stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do
> about this? I like to keep things optimised.



 
Reply With Quote
 
C.Joseph S. Drayton
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2008
John wrote:

>At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green
>(unmovable) stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do
>about this? I like to keep things optimised.


There is a posibility that you are using a Windows managed pagefile
which means that the size of the pagefile is dynamic. In that case,
your pagefile could be on a couple of different sections of the hard
disk. When I do use a pagefile (which is almost NEVER), I have it set
to a fixed size and the whole file is allocated at one time. If the
hard disk has been properly defragged right before this, you get one
file that is contiguous.

You will also get very slightly better performance from the pagefile
since it is not having to move all over the hard disk to find sections
of itself.

--

Sincerely,
C.Joseph Drayton, Ph.D. AS&T

CSD Computer Services

Web site: http://csdcs.itgo.com/
E-mail: (E-Mail Removed)
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill in Co.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2008
C.Joseph S. Drayton wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> At one time when I ran defrag I only used to have one or two green
>> (unmovable) stripes. I now have 6 - is there anything I should do
>> about this? I like to keep things optimised.

>
> There is a posibility that you are using a Windows managed pagefile
> which means that the size of the pagefile is dynamic. In that case,
> your pagefile could be on a couple of different sections of the hard
> disk. When I do use a pagefile (which is almost NEVER), I have it set
> to a fixed size and the whole file is allocated at one time. If the
> hard disk has been properly defragged right before this, you get one
> file that is contiguous.
>
> You will also get very slightly better performance from the pagefile
> since it is not having to move all over the hard disk to find sections
> of itself.


What is also interesting is that sometimes the fairly large (default 15%(?)
of the disk space) so-called, "reserved MFT zone" becomes quite small, OR
vice versa (suddenly reappears again in the middle of the drive, back at
15%).

I haven't figured out why it sometimes changes this way (after doing
restores, backups, etc).


 
Reply With Quote
 
Nonny
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2008

On Fri, 30 May 2008 21:08:51 -0600, "Bill in Co."
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>What is also interesting is that sometimes the fairly large (default 15%(?)
>of the disk space) so-called, "reserved MFT zone" becomes quite small, OR
>vice versa (suddenly reappears again in the middle of the drive, back at
>15%).
>
>I haven't figured out why it sometimes changes this way (after doing
>restores, backups, etc).


It's 12.5%. And it gets smaller as needed, i.e., it will get smaller
if space is needed for other files. The only permanent thing about it
is that the MFT reserved space is the last to be used for storing
files.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill in Co.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2008
Nonny wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 21:08:51 -0600, "Bill in Co."
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> What is also interesting is that sometimes the fairly large (default
>> 15%(?)
>> of the disk space) so-called, "reserved MFT zone" becomes quite small, OR
>> vice versa (suddenly reappears again in the middle of the drive, back at
>> 15%).
>>
>> I haven't figured out why it sometimes changes this way (after doing
>> restores, backups, etc).

>
> It's 12.5%. And it gets smaller as needed, i.e., it will get smaller
> if space is needed for other files. The only permanent thing about it
> is that the MFT reserved space is the last to be used for storing files.


Well, I was talking about a HUGE change in its size, when I still have tons
of disk space.

I mean, if you look at the defragger legend map, sometimes the "reserved MFT
Zone" is only a few clusters in size, and at some other times, it looks like
its the good old, 12.5% of the total disk space - depending on its mood.
In ALL cases, I have PLENTY of disk space (about half of the disk is free),
and that hasn't changed.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Internet Explorer 7 (32-bits) keeps on freezing wile the 64-bits works OK in Vista 64 Trond Ruud Windows Vista General Discussion 1 16th Jun 2007 04:30 PM
An approach for n-bit int. / m-bit ext. scanners (was: Re: Sprintscan 35+, 10 bits vs 8 bits) Lorenzo J. Lucchini Scanners 18 9th Nov 2005 02:09 PM
Defrag help !! defrag runs fine but doesnt defrag the drive bob Microsoft Windows 2000 3 14th Mar 2005 08:48 PM
Win32 bits and Win64 bits. JAPHET Microsoft Windows 2000 Hardware 1 20th Oct 2004 03:20 PM
IE 6 Cipher Strength: 0-bits upgrade to 128-bits Roy Asercion Windows XP Internet Explorer 1 24th Dec 2003 03:18 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 PM.