PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

defense against hacking

 
 
jack belck
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Sep 2009
An operator can't get his computer to do anything without keyboard or mouse
input. If he wishes to open the registry, regit is entered on the run line.
But a downloaded infected executable can open it, meaning that the OS can't
distinguish between local and outside inputs, even though the former is
directly mechanical, the other purely electronic. Surely the distinction can
be harnessed. With executables coming in through an email attachment, why
can't software writers at least displaying an "are you sure...?" warning in\
instead of handing it off to be opened? Further, an operator can't send his
address book to one or a thousand others without key strokes and mouse work.
WHY CAN'T THE OS SEE THE DIFFERENCE?

Command line pipes are long gone, but surely motherboard and OS changes
combined could make a serious dent in hackers' activities by working on the
flow and direction of instructions from wherever. As with any information,
always consider the source.
Why isn't it being done?



--
jack belck
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Scott M.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11th Sep 2009
Feel better? What was your Microsoft .NET question?


"jack belck" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:CC923F82-BFBD-4FCD-A7BF-(E-Mail Removed)...
> An operator can't get his computer to do anything without keyboard or
> mouse
> input. If he wishes to open the registry, regit is entered on the run
> line.
> But a downloaded infected executable can open it, meaning that the OS
> can't
> distinguish between local and outside inputs, even though the former is
> directly mechanical, the other purely electronic. Surely the distinction
> can
> be harnessed. With executables coming in through an email attachment, why
> can't software writers at least displaying an "are you sure...?" warning
> in\
> instead of handing it off to be opened? Further, an operator can't send
> his
> address book to one or a thousand others without key strokes and mouse
> work.
> WHY CAN'T THE OS SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
>
> Command line pipes are long gone, but surely motherboard and OS changes
> combined could make a serious dent in hackers' activities by working on
> the
> flow and direction of instructions from wherever. As with any information,
> always consider the source.
> Why isn't it being done?
>
>
>
> --
> jack belck



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Non Defense Freeze. W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com Windows Vista General Discussion 1 28th Jan 2010 04:39 AM
hacking,anti-hacking,registry tweaks,compter tric e.expelliarmus Anti-Virus 0 25th Sep 2007 09:11 AM
excess of defense ghiacciomenta Windows Vista Security 0 27th Jun 2006 06:41 PM
wi-fi defense serial? Paul Windows XP General 1 17th Jan 2005 11:30 PM
the spyware defense status@rtdos.info Freeware 1 2nd Nov 2003 01:59 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 PM.