hello,

is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng console
from defender and the symantec resource protector ?

For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...

Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to expect
that....

regards,
Joris.

Information now would be indeed really appreciated!
Soon it will be the moment to renew the subscription of my Norton Antivirus
2005.
I am a Norton AV consumer satisfied from 1998, but this conflict, if won't
be resolved, could make me different choices.

"joris" wrote:

> hello,
>
> is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng console
> from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
>
> For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
>
> Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to expect
> that....
>
> regards,
> Joris.
>

Besides the log entries, what negative behavior do you see?

--
-steve

Steve Dodson [MSFT]
Windows Defender Beta Lead
MCSE, CISSP
http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm

Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
originated.
"joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> hello,
>
> is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> console
> from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
>
> For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
>
> Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> expect
> that....
>
> regards,
> Joris.
>

none i think ( and i hope) , only the logs , up to 50 times a day..., but
maybe there are other conflicts under the surface... , the only thing i can
say is that 50 times a day the msmpeng console is trying to brake in to
symantec and the symantec resource protection is stopping this , and i think
every time system resources are used to do so....

i have passed my log to bill sanderson , i think you recieved it ?(some
weeks ago )





"Steve Dodson [MSFT]" wrote:

> Besides the log entries, what negative behavior do you see?
>
> --
> -steve
>
> Steve Dodson [MSFT]
> Windows Defender Beta Lead
> MCSE, CISSP
> http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
> message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
> originated.
> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > hello,
> >
> > is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> > console
> > from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
> >
> > For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
> >
> > Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> > expect
> > that....
> >
> > regards,
> > Joris.
> >
>
>
>

I don't really understand.
With the old MS antispyware beta 1 there were not any problem of
compatibility with "Symantec resource protector", and the program was
recognized from all as very effective.
Now, with Defender beta 2, from months it speaks of this issue on this
Newsgroup, but it still seems that Microsoft has not faced it, and, still
less, resolved!

"Steve Dodson [MSFT]" wrote:

> Besides the log entries, what negative behavior do you see?
>
> --
> -steve
>
> Steve Dodson [MSFT]
> Windows Defender Beta Lead
> MCSE, CISSP
> http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
> message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
> originated.
> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > hello,
> >
> > is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> > console
> > from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
> >
> > For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
> >
> > Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> > expect
> > that....
> >
> > regards,
> > Joris.
> >
>
>
>

Hello,
The conflict with Symantec files would have been over if File Exclusion
feature of Windows Defender functioned as intended; but it doesn't. I placed
all Norton Internet Security and Symantec files in the file exclusion pane
but Defender simply ignored this and kept on trying to access Norton files,
which was stopped.
"joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> hello,
>
> is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> console
> from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
>
> For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
>
> Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> expect
> that....
>
> regards,
> Joris.
>

still same question , is microsoft still investigating ? , and with results
soon to come i hope ? maybe in cooperation with symantec if thats possible
......


"Erhan Karabekir" wrote:

> Hello,
> The conflict with Symantec files would have been over if File Exclusion
> feature of Windows Defender functioned as intended; but it doesn't. I placed
> all Norton Internet Security and Symantec files in the file exclusion pane
> but Defender simply ignored this and kept on trying to access Norton files,
> which was stopped.
> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > hello,
> >
> > is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> > console
> > from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
> >
> > For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
> >
> > Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> > expect
> > that....
> >
> > regards,
> > Joris.
> >
>
>
>

I have made some attempts:
If in Windows Defender, under Tools/Options/Real-time Protection Options, it
is unchecked the "Application Execution" module (only), nothing appears
anymore in the Log of "Symantec resource protector".
I hope that this helps you for resolving the ISSUE!

"Steve Dodson [MSFT]" wrote:

> Besides the log entries, what negative behavior do you see?
>
> --
> -steve
>
> Steve Dodson [MSFT]
> Windows Defender Beta Lead
> MCSE, CISSP
> http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
> --
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
> message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
> originated.
> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > hello,
> >
> > is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
> > console
> > from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
> >
> > For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
> >
> > Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
> > expect
> > that....
> >
> > regards,
> > Joris.
> >
>
>
>

I did receive the logs.. thanks for that. I wanted to make sure there was
not a new issue we were not aware of.

--
-steve

Steve Dodson [MSFT]
Windows Defender Beta Lead
MCSE, CISSP
http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm

Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
originated.
"joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:CFDF3D95-576E-49C1-B4F9-(E-Mail Removed)...
> none i think ( and i hope) , only the logs , up to 50 times a day..., but
> maybe there are other conflicts under the surface... , the only thing i
> can
> say is that 50 times a day the msmpeng console is trying to brake in to
> symantec and the symantec resource protection is stopping this , and i
> think
> every time system resources are used to do so....
>
> i have passed my log to bill sanderson , i think you recieved it ?(some
> weeks ago )
>
>
>
>
>
> "Steve Dodson [MSFT]" wrote:
>
>> Besides the log entries, what negative behavior do you see?
>>
>> --
>> -steve
>>
>> Steve Dodson [MSFT]
>> Windows Defender Beta Lead
>> MCSE, CISSP
>> http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod
>> --
>>
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>> Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
>> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>>
>> Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
>> message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
>> originated.
>> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:ECA221C0-0469-4E31-994E-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > hello,
>> >
>> > is there already some news about the interaction between the msmpeng
>> > console
>> > from defender and the symantec resource protector ?
>> >
>> > For the moment the interaction is still going on in my logs...
>> >
>> > Will it be solved in a new build , and can you tell me maybe when to
>> > expect
>> > that....
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Joris.
>> >
>>
>>
>>