Good choice Stu: 'Caution' sounds right to me. After all, an alert from SAS
about a file that mysteriously appears and then disappears in the 'Temp'
folder, which won't let itself be deleted, and whose existence you haven't
actually had cause to notice before, does warrant more than a shrug of the
shoulders, I think - even for the non-paranoid.
Cheers,
Alan D
"Stu" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0948729A-F99A-4521-AEE4-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Not necessarily so - rubbish that is. I think a little (I want to say
> `paranoia`) doesn`t do anyone any harm - provided it doesn`t start to
> consume
> your life. Having said that, the Wikipedia definition doesn`t look too
> encouraging for me. Shall we just settle for CAUTION? 
>
> Stu
>
> "Alan D" wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this, Stu.
>>
>> I do use Ccleaner quite often to clear out temporary files, and indeed as
>> you point out, at the moment these 512K files don't queue up for deletion
>> because they're 'in use'. It seems they just get tidied away by whatever
>> app
>> is using them, later.
>>
>> There's really nothing to test by rerunning scans after a Ccleaner
>> clear-out, because all my scans are coming up clear now, anyway. In
>> particular, SAS is now completely uninterested in those temp files. I'm
>> actually wondering if this had something to do with the new installation
>> of
>> the new version of SAS not having quite 'bedded itself in' after just one
>> reboot - though that may be complete nonsense of course!
>> Cheers,
>> Alan D
>>
>> "Stu" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:A15AFEAF-47C9-461D-9FB4-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Further to Bill`s post. I see lots of those in Ccleaner when I have a
>> > system
>> > clean up every now and then but have no idea what they mean or have I
>> > had
>> > a
>> > problem with them. I only take an interest in anything that may
>> > reference
>> > a
>> > specific file location and (as Bill has already said in previous post),
>> > has a
>> > dubious file name/extension. Do you/have you used Ccleaner to clean out
>> > your
>> > Temp Folder and rerun the scan? Don`t be surprised if it is not empty
>> > after a
>> > run in normal mode because those temp files currently in use by an
>> > application will not be accessed and therefore deleted.
>> >
>> > Stu
>> >
>> > "Alan D" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Could someone tell me, please, if Defender generates a temp file from
>> >> time
>> >> to time, in C:\Windows\Temp - with a name that takes this kind of
>> >> form? -
>> >> TMP00000024E8962F1A6A88E610 ?
>> >>
>> >> The reason I ask is because the new version of Superantispyware
>> >> flagged
>> >> up
>> >> just such a file this morning (as Adware.Spyware Labs). I quarantined
>> >> it
>> >> (being a temp file, it seemed sensible to do that), but I noticed that
>> >> on
>> >> next computer restart a file with a similar (but different) name
>> >> appeared -
>> >> just for a short time - in the same place - but Superantispyware found
>> >> this
>> >> new one to be no threat. After a few restarts, I noticed that the
>> >> appearance
>> >> of the file seems to happen at about the time that Defender puts up
>> >> its
>> >> regular notification of registry change. Then the temp file disappears
>> >> after
>> >> a bit.
>> >>
>> >> So I'm starting to wonder if the original alert was a false positive
>> >> by
>> >> SAS,
>> >> particularly since none of these subsequent files have generated an
>> >> alert.
>> >> But I need to know if Defender really is producing these 'temporary'
>> >> temp
>> >> files in order to decide whether I need to investigate further - can
>> >> someone
>> >> tell me, please?
>> >>
>> >> I should say that scans by AVG, a-squared, and Superantispyware
>> >> (subsequent
>> >> to that first scan) are all coming up clean.
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Alan D
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>