Your complaint mirrors one made multiple times weekly, pretty much
throughout the beta--beta1 or beta2. So clearly, the way this works does
not match the expectations that the users have when they look at what the
pages display.
There's a post from a Microsoft staffer somewhere in these groups in the
last day or so which suggested, as I recall, that the prompts from real-time
protection should be read as blocking "per boot cycle"--as I'm recalling
it--rather than permanently.
I don't know what they can do to make this clearer--but I'll agree that the
current wording is confusing--and that beta2 hasn't improved on this over
beta1.
--
"Rob Wiggins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0C52E5CD-9B71-459E-8F9E-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Bill;
> Thanks for your explanation, it was appreciated and does explain why I
> don't
> see items in the Allow list. I would suggest that the way the program in
> running is not very intuitive, and it might not be a bad idea to consider
> correction. As a user, I would like to be able to review all the programs
> which have been "allowed" in such an allow list so that I may be able to
> make
> changes if I no longer want them allowed. The allow list would be a
> straight
> forward vehicle for such manipulation. The suggestion you made is far mor
> time consuming and indirect for me to consider using it.
>
> Best Regards;
> --
> Robert Wiggins
>
>
> "Bill Sanderson" wrote:
>
>> I understand that you see the expected behavior would be for items you
>> approve to be added to the "allowed items" list. However, I also can see
>> that is not how the product is working.
>>
>> Items detected in a scan, and set to always ignore, will be added to the
>> allowed items list.
>>
>> If you are seeing repeated prompts for items that don't fit that
>> category,
>> the way to avoid those prompts, I believe, is to manually add them to the
>> list of items or areas not to be scanned.
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Rob Wiggins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:C756CC4E-4C53-49F6-A05A-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Bill Sanderson;
>> >
>> > Please note that my original question was not how to define areas "not
>> > to
>> > be
>> > scanned", but rather why there is nothing ever showing in the "Tools",
>> > "allowed items" list.
>> >
>> > Example: if a program is "allowed" why doesn't it show in the "allowed
>> > list".
>> >
>> > I suspect you missed my point on the original question!
>> > --
>> > Robert Wiggins
>> >
>> >
>> > "Bill Sanderson" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Quite right!--sorry. Go to Tools, general settings, scroll down to
>> >> Advanced
>> >> Options, and hit Add. Then use the "browse for folder" dialog box
>> >> which
>> >> opens to browse to the item you want to not scan.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "Rob Wiggins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> >> news:7989B8B4-73E5-4266-9747-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> > Bill Sanderson;
>> >> >
>> >> > There is no "Browse" button in "Tools", "General settings"! In fact
>> >> > it
>> >> > is
>> >> > not even in "Tools", "Allowed Items" either.
>> >> > --
>> >> > Robert Wiggins
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Bill Sanderson" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I think this is normal--you need to fill that list manually, via
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> browse
>> >> >> button in tools, general settings.
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Rob Wiggins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> >> >> message
>> >> >> news
7691DDB-609D-40D5-B547-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> >> >I don't see anyone having or identifying the following experience.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Whenever I "Allow" a new program through the Defender interface,
>> >> >> > It
>> >> >> > soesn't
>> >> >> > show up in the "Tools" , "Allowed Items" list. In fact the list
>> >> >> > is
>> >> >> > always
>> >> >> > empty so I have no ability to alter the status of any programs
>> >> >> > which
>> >> >> > are
>> >> >> > allowed.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Can someone identify if this is normal in the current beta
>> >> >> > version
>> >> >> > (Windows Defender Version 1.1.1051.0; Engine Version 1.1.1186.0;
>> >> >> > Signature
>> >> >> > version 1.13.1286.1) running on Win XP SP2.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Any knowledge regarding this would be appreciated.
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Robert Wiggins
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Robert Wiggins
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>