PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

default command.com environment size

 
 
BobS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2005
Hi,

Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the config.nt
command line

shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com

is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
KB161564?

I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows NT but
now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It appears
that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of 256.

BobS



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jerold Schulman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2005
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:07:59 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the config.nt
>command line
>
>shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com
>
>is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
>KB161564?
>
>I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows NT but
>now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It appears
>that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of 256.
>
>BobS
>
>

Exactly.

See Size at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW
If it is zero, W2K, WinXP, etc. chooses that max available in your computer's environment.


Jerold Schulman
Windows Server MVP
JSI, Inc.
http://www.jsiinc.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
BobS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2005
Great, thanks Jerold, I wanted to confirm that before something else blows.
These legacy apps are like a juggling act.

BobS


"Jerold Schulman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:07:59 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the

config.nt
> >command line
> >
> >shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com
> >
> >is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
> >KB161564?
> >
> >I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows NT

but
> >now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It

appears
> >that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of

256.
> >
> >BobS
> >
> >

> Exactly.
>
> See Size at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW
> If it is zero, W2K, WinXP, etc. chooses that max available in your

computer's environment.
>
>
> Jerold Schulman
> Windows Server MVP
> JSI, Inc.
> http://www.jsiinc.com



 
Reply With Quote
 
BobS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Jan 2005
Jerold,

Another question please. Size is indeed zero but when I change /e=xxxxx in
config.nt I still see no change in Size. Does this mean the \e arg is no
longer useful? Do I need to set Size manually?

Well, that was two questions so two Thanks,
BobS

"Jerold Schulman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:07:59 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the

config.nt
> >command line
> >
> >shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com
> >
> >is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
> >KB161564?
> >
> >I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows NT

but
> >now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It

appears
> >that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of

256.
> >
> >BobS
> >
> >

> Exactly.
>
> See Size at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW
> If it is zero, W2K, WinXP, etc. chooses that max available in your

computer's environment.
>
>
> Jerold Schulman
> Windows Server MVP
> JSI, Inc.
> http://www.jsiinc.com



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jerold Schulman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Jan 2005


/e=nnnnn works, but only for 32bit processes.



On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:58:44 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Jerold,
>
>Another question please. Size is indeed zero but when I change /e=xxxxx in
>config.nt I still see no change in Size. Does this mean the \e arg is no
>longer useful? Do I need to set Size manually?
>
>Well, that was two questions so two Thanks,
>BobS
>
>"Jerold Schulman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:07:59 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the

>config.nt
>> >command line
>> >
>> >shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com
>> >
>> >is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
>> >KB161564?
>> >
>> >I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows NT

>but
>> >now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It

>appears
>> >that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of

>256.
>> >
>> >BobS
>> >
>> >

>> Exactly.
>>
>> See Size at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW
>> If it is zero, W2K, WinXP, etc. chooses that max available in your

>computer's environment.
>>
>>
>> Jerold Schulman
>> Windows Server MVP
>> JSI, Inc.
>> http://www.jsiinc.com

>



Jerold Schulman
Windows Server MVP
JSI, Inc.
http://www.jsiinc.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
BobS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Jan 2005
Jerold, thanks again...that sure explains what I thought were
inconsistencies that I've been seeing.

BobS

"Jerold Schulman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
> /e=nnnnn works, but only for 32bit processes.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:58:44 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Jerold,
> >
> >Another question please. Size is indeed zero but when I change /e=xxxxx

in
> >config.nt I still see no change in Size. Does this mean the \e arg is no
> >longer useful? Do I need to set Size manually?
> >
> >Well, that was two questions so two Thanks,
> >BobS
> >
> >"Jerold Schulman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:07:59 -0500, "BobS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >Does anyone know if the default behavior for Windows 2000 of the

> >config.nt
> >> >command line
> >> >
> >> >shell=%systemroot%\system32\command.com
> >> >
> >> >is still to establish an environment size of 256 bytes as specified in
> >> >KB161564?
> >> >
> >> >I have some legacy apps that required a large /e=20480 under Windows

NT
> >but
> >> >now seem to run correctly only when the /e argument is removed. It

> >appears
> >> >that under Windows 2000, the default may be 'max available' instead of

> >256.
> >> >
> >> >BobS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Exactly.
> >>
> >> See Size at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW
> >> If it is zero, W2K, WinXP, etc. chooses that max available in your

> >computer's environment.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jerold Schulman
> >> Windows Server MVP
> >> JSI, Inc.
> >> http://www.jsiinc.com

> >

>
>
> Jerold Schulman
> Windows Server MVP
> JSI, Inc.
> http://www.jsiinc.com



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Change the default Font and size in a network environment =?Utf-8?B?VGhvbnk=?= Microsoft Word Document Management 4 10th Aug 2007 11:28 AM
DOS environment size Eric Windows XP General 6 28th Apr 2006 04:10 PM
better command line environment? Spoon2001 Freeware 10 16th Feb 2004 04:28 PM
setting DOS environment size Keith Microsoft Windows 2000 CMD Promt 6 20th Dec 2003 02:16 PM
SET Command for global environment variables Andreas Klausing Microsoft Windows 2000 CMD Promt 3 29th Nov 2003 11:46 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 AM.