Tom,
Being somewhat broader and more general, my comments were only incidental to
the thread, and not intended to indicate disagreement with anything you said
(or asked).
/Al
"Tim Meddick" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Al,
> While I know groups such as this are "valuable" for the same reasons
> as you...
>
> All I was asking and pointing out to the OP was "where did he get his
> documentation?" and (because) the documentation provided by "Window's Help
> and Support Center" *is* incomplete.
>
> Whereas, the information (in this case only) provided by [ set /? ]
> *does* include exactly the information the OP was looking for (as far as I
> can make out), plus examples *are* included as well (again, in the case of
> the SET command only).
>
> [This is why I was asking "where did he get his documentation?"]
>
> ==
>
> Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
>
>
>
> "Al Dunbar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:6B4981CA-B348-4773-9A63-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I agree that, basically, the seeds of all you need to know are in the info
>>displayed by most commands when "/?" is given as the parameter. But that
>>documentation still leaves it up to the reader to figure out how to do the
>>less than obvious when it is not given as a specific example. Which is one
>>large reason why resources such as this newsgroup are valuable.
>>
>> /Al
>>
>> "Tim Meddick" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Where are you looking for your "documentation"?
>>>
>>
>> < clipped >
>>
|