PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

DataTable.Select method bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Jun 2005
Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it is
again.

Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't get
support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.

This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.

By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework SP1?
You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the SP1
of Windows 2003 but it does...

Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve this
problem?

Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):

There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.

Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742

and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
not work properly!

Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
meet the filter conditions.

We have a detailed description of this problem at :

http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/

and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
problems we are experiencing.

As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix we
decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients not
running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.

The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that an
effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this very
harmful bug.

The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Cor Ligthert
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Jun 2005
Lynch,

Please, don't give the impression if the thread is deleted because of the
subject

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...9da136edf5dcea

I see more times in this thread that David Sceppa has tried to help you. I
can assure you that he is from Microsoft.

Luckily enough have these newsgroups using newsreaders again a retention
time from 2 months. If it was longer (as it has been the last months) than
some newsgroups including probably this one are impossible to reach for dial
up users with newsreaders.

If you want archieve information than use Google (or probably the Webversion
what I don't know).

Cor


 
Reply With Quote
 
Adrian Moore
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
lynch,

You might be interested in the assembly I've been working on at
http://www.queryadataset.com. It lets you perform complex SQL SELECT
statements including UNION, JOINS, GROUP BY, HAVING, ORDER BY, sub-queries,
etc against the tables in a dataset.

The web-site allows you to upload your own XML data fragment, DataSet or
resultset and issue queries using the QueryADataSet assembly. You can
select the XML document included in your test harness (User Uploaded -
ApplicationData.XML) and try the following query:

select * from [ENT_H_EMPLOYEE] where EntityId = 1 AND Deleted = 0 AND
FieldId = 70 AND HistoryStartDate >= '02/16/2005' order by entityid

The result, as you expect, should be 0 rows and 1 row if the date condition
is removed. While the downloadable demo does not generate the correct
results to this query, due to a bug, the web-site clearly demonstrates this
query working. If you are interested, I can provide an updated .NET 1.1
version of the assembly for you to download and try.

Hope this helps
Adrian Moore
http://www.queryadataset.com


"lynch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:05CCA54B-2BB0-49BD-9473-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it
> is
> again.
>
> Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't
> get
> support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
> tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.
>
> This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.
>
> By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework
> SP1?
> You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the
> SP1
> of Windows 2003 but it does...
>
> Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve
> this
> problem?
>
> Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):
>
> There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.
>
> Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742
>
> and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
> not work properly!
>
> Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
> relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
> expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
> meet the filter conditions.
>
> We have a detailed description of this problem at :
>
> http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/
>
> and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
> problems we are experiencing.
>
> As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix
> we
> decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients
> not
> running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.
>
> The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that
> an
> effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this
> very
> harmful bug.
>
> The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
> Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Thank you Adrian.

I would be very much interested in the updated .Net 1.1 version of the
assembly you've been working on. It would be a great help.

Since there are no answers from Microsoft concerning to this issue, we have
been considering writing our own filtering classes. If you could provide a
working solution for this problem we most certainly would consider using it.

PS - if you want to contact me directly please do at:

(E-Mail Removed)

Thank you very much.

"Adrian Moore" wrote:

> lynch,
>
> You might be interested in the assembly I've been working on at
> http://www.queryadataset.com. It lets you perform complex SQL SELECT
> statements including UNION, JOINS, GROUP BY, HAVING, ORDER BY, sub-queries,
> etc against the tables in a dataset.
>
> The web-site allows you to upload your own XML data fragment, DataSet or
> resultset and issue queries using the QueryADataSet assembly. You can
> select the XML document included in your test harness (User Uploaded -
> ApplicationData.XML) and try the following query:
>
> select * from [ENT_H_EMPLOYEE] where EntityId = 1 AND Deleted = 0 AND
> FieldId = 70 AND HistoryStartDate >= '02/16/2005' order by entityid
>
> The result, as you expect, should be 0 rows and 1 row if the date condition
> is removed. While the downloadable demo does not generate the correct
> results to this query, due to a bug, the web-site clearly demonstrates this
> query working. If you are interested, I can provide an updated .NET 1.1
> version of the assembly for you to download and try.
>
> Hope this helps
> Adrian Moore
> http://www.queryadataset.com
>
>
> "lynch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:05CCA54B-2BB0-49BD-9473-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it
> > is
> > again.
> >
> > Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't
> > get
> > support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
> > tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.
> >
> > This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.
> >
> > By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework
> > SP1?
> > You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the
> > SP1
> > of Windows 2003 but it does...
> >
> > Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve
> > this
> > problem?
> >
> > Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):
> >
> > There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.
> >
> > Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742
> >
> > and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
> > not work properly!
> >
> > Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
> > relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
> > expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
> > meet the filter conditions.
> >
> > We have a detailed description of this problem at :
> >
> > http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/
> >
> > and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
> > problems we are experiencing.
> >
> > As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix
> > we
> > decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients
> > not
> > running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.
> >
> > The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that
> > an
> > effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this
> > very
> > harmful bug.
> >
> > The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
> > Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...
> >

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Hi.

David Sceppa did try to help us solve the problem.

And Microsoft, as I stated, released an Hotfix that should correct this
problem.
But it doesn't work!

I would like to remind you that this is not Open Source.
All companies that develop for Microsoft .Net Framework are helping
Microsoft sell it's products and are investing a great deal of money on that
development. It is only fair if not mandatory for Microsoft to fix the
problems it creates.

This has become a problem since .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 and now for .Net
Framework 2.0 Beta 2.

This issue has been around since September 2004!!! It is time it get's
fixed. Don't you think so?

Thanks

Lynch

"Cor Ligthert" wrote:

> Lynch,
>
> Please, don't give the impression if the thread is deleted because of the
> subject
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...9da136edf5dcea
>
> I see more times in this thread that David Sceppa has tried to help you. I
> can assure you that he is from Microsoft.
>
> Luckily enough have these newsgroups using newsreaders again a retention
> time from 2 months. If it was longer (as it has been the last months) than
> some newsgroups including probably this one are impossible to reach for dial
> up users with newsreaders.
>
> If you want archieve information than use Google (or probably the Webversion
> what I don't know).
>
> Cor
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Sahil Malik [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Lynch, I'd love to help you out, as I am sure others will too. Unfortunately
I donot have enough hardware to support this issue. :-( . I.e. I donot have
a machine with .NET 1.1 and another with .NET 1.1 and SP1.

BTW, before you point out, Microsoft does not pay me zilch for anything,
neither they control what I say.

- Sahil Malik [MVP]
Upcoming ADO.NET 2.0 book - http://tinyurl.com/9bync
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



"lynch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:05CCA54B-2BB0-49BD-9473-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it
> is
> again.
>
> Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't
> get
> support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
> tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.
>
> This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.
>
> By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework
> SP1?
> You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the
> SP1
> of Windows 2003 but it does...
>
> Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve
> this
> problem?
>
> Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):
>
> There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.
>
> Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742
>
> and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
> not work properly!
>
> Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
> relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
> expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
> meet the filter conditions.
>
> We have a detailed description of this problem at :
>
> http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/
>
> and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
> problems we are experiencing.
>
> As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix
> we
> decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients
> not
> running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.
>
> The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that
> an
> effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this
> very
> harmful bug.
>
> The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
> Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIE1hbGFmYXlhIEJhcHRpc3Rh?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Sahil,

can't you use Microsoft Virtual PC for testing?
I'm also being affected by this issue. SP1 introduces this bug in the Select
method and I can't imagine myself writing a new Select method from
scratch(!). Any and all help in solving this matter for good would be
tremendously appreciated!

André

"Sahil Malik [MVP]" wrote:

> Lynch, I'd love to help you out, as I am sure others will too. Unfortunately
> I donot have enough hardware to support this issue. :-( . I.e. I donot have
> a machine with .NET 1.1 and another with .NET 1.1 and SP1.
>
> BTW, before you point out, Microsoft does not pay me zilch for anything,
> neither they control what I say.
>
> - Sahil Malik [MVP]
> Upcoming ADO.NET 2.0 book - http://tinyurl.com/9bync
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> "lynch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:05CCA54B-2BB0-49BD-9473-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it
> > is
> > again.
> >
> > Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't
> > get
> > support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
> > tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.
> >
> > This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.
> >
> > By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework
> > SP1?
> > You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the
> > SP1
> > of Windows 2003 but it does...
> >
> > Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve
> > this
> > problem?
> >
> > Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):
> >
> > There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.
> >
> > Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742
> >
> > and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
> > not work properly!
> >
> > Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
> > relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
> > expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
> > meet the filter conditions.
> >
> > We have a detailed description of this problem at :
> >
> > http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/
> >
> > and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
> > problems we are experiencing.
> >
> > As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix
> > we
> > decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients
> > not
> > running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.
> >
> > The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that
> > an
> > effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this
> > very
> > harmful bug.
> >
> > The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
> > Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...
> >

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Hi Sahil:

Thanks for your interest.

It's always the same: those that want to help never get anything in return.

Still if any of you could lend me a hand, I would appreciate it.

Thanks

PS - Still hoping Microsoft solves this one.

"Sahil Malik [MVP]" wrote:

> Lynch, I'd love to help you out, as I am sure others will too. Unfortunately
> I donot have enough hardware to support this issue. :-( . I.e. I donot have
> a machine with .NET 1.1 and another with .NET 1.1 and SP1.
>
> BTW, before you point out, Microsoft does not pay me zilch for anything,
> neither they control what I say.
>
> - Sahil Malik [MVP]
> Upcoming ADO.NET 2.0 book - http://tinyurl.com/9bync
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> "lynch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:05CCA54B-2BB0-49BD-9473-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Since Microsoft removed the original thread from this newsgroup... here it
> > is
> > again.
> >
> > Just to add some comments: we are MSDN Universal Subscribers and didn't
> > get
> > support from Microsoft. We are being ignored for almost 5 months. We have
> > tested Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 Beta 2 and the problem is still there.
> >
> > This is worst than a virus and Microsoft does nothing.
> >
> > By the way: did you know that Windows 2003 SP1 installs .Net Framework
> > SP1?
> > You can't find this information in any of Microsoft's documents about the
> > SP1
> > of Windows 2003 but it does...
> >
> > Has anyone from Microsoft the decency to answer this post and to solve
> > this
> > problem?
> >
> > Here is one of the original posts (25/02/2005):
> >
> > There is a bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 with the DataTable.Select method.
> >
> > Microsoft's description of the problem may be found here
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;891742
> >
> > and you can ask for a fix to that issue. The problem is that the fix does
> > not work properly!
> >
> > Some problems were solved with this fix but some persist. And the problem
> > relates to the overload of DataTable.Select with a filter and a sort
> > expression: in that case the result of the method returns rows that do not
> > meet the filter conditions.
> >
> > We have a detailed description of this problem at :
> >
> > http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/
> >
> > and have included a new test harness (source code included) to test the
> > problems we are experiencing.
> >
> > As we can't tell for sure what gets solved and what doesn't with this fix
> > we
> > decided to continue limiting the support for our applications for clients
> > not
> > running the SP1 of the .Net Framework 1.1.
> >
> > The purpose of this thread is to notify microsoft for the problem so that
> > an
> > effective fix is released and to alert the developer community for this
> > very
> > harmful bug.
> >
> > The first thread I know of reporting this problem dates from 9/9/2004 and
> > Microsoft still hasn't fixed the problem...
> >

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Cor Ligthert
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Lynch

I don't like the impression you gave. I don't like it when somebody is
pointing his finger while there is so much help given.

I tried to do it with this code in which is your first message. And I saw
nothing wrong. Maybe can you try it as well and than also simulate until it
goes wrong?

Or maybe I oversee something than I will be glad to hear what?

\\\\Needs only a datagrid and a form

Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As
System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
Dim dt As New DataTable
dt.Columns.Add("EntityID", GetType(System.Int32))
dt.Columns.Add("Deleted", GetType(System.Int32))
dt.Columns.Add("FieldId", GetType(System.Int32))
dt.Columns.Add("HistoryStartDate", GetType(System.DateTime))
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
True)
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 1, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
True)
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 1, 71, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
True)
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7015, 0, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
True)
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2003, 7, 1)},
True)
dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2005, 7, 1)},
True)
Dim dr() As DataRow = _
dt.Select("EntityId = 7016 AND Deleted = 0 AND FieldId = 70 AND
HistoryStartDate >= #07/01/2004 00:00:00#")
Dim dt2 As New DataTable
dt2 = dt.Clone
For Each dr1 As DataRow In dr
dt2.ImportRow(dr1)
Next
DataGrid1.DataSource = dt2
End Sub
///

I hope this helps,

Cor


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Jun 2005
Hi Cor.

Thanks for your help.

About the bug:

The test you are running works well. As I have said before, the hotfix from
Microsoft solved that problem. But some problems remain as I state in
http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0434926301/. For the purpose os reproducing that
problem we made available a test harness with source code. Just read the text
try the TH with and without .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 and you will reproduce the
problem.

All the help from the comunity members is very much welcome and very much
appreciated. As you just did and as I often do. I thank you for the time you
are taking to look at this problem, helping me and the entire .net comunity.

If you have more ideas they're very welcome.

About Microsoft:

But Microsoft MUST solve the problem. It is their obligation to solve the
problem or just stop supporting that feature.

The last post from Microsoft concerning this issue is from Amir Massourian
stating:
"Thanks Lynch for reporting, we will investigate this issue" (26/02/2005).
As good as it might be to have someone aknowledge the problem do you think
this is a realy helpfull post since it has already been 4 months since that
reply? What is Microsoft doing about that? Plain ignoring? Shouldn't the
developers comunity ask Microsoft to solve the problems instead of trying
again and again to find a workaround for Microsoft's bugs?

Thanks



"Cor Ligthert" wrote:

> Lynch
>
> I don't like the impression you gave. I don't like it when somebody is
> pointing his finger while there is so much help given.
>
> I tried to do it with this code in which is your first message. And I saw
> nothing wrong. Maybe can you try it as well and than also simulate until it
> goes wrong?
>
> Or maybe I oversee something than I will be glad to hear what?
>
> \\\\Needs only a datagrid and a form
>
> Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As
> System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
> Dim dt As New DataTable
> dt.Columns.Add("EntityID", GetType(System.Int32))
> dt.Columns.Add("Deleted", GetType(System.Int32))
> dt.Columns.Add("FieldId", GetType(System.Int32))
> dt.Columns.Add("HistoryStartDate", GetType(System.DateTime))
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
> True)
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 1, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
> True)
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 1, 71, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
> True)
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7015, 0, 70, New DateTime(2004, 7, 1)},
> True)
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2003, 7, 1)},
> True)
> dt.LoadDataRow(New Object() {7016, 0, 70, New DateTime(2005, 7, 1)},
> True)
> Dim dr() As DataRow = _
> dt.Select("EntityId = 7016 AND Deleted = 0 AND FieldId = 70 AND
> HistoryStartDate >= #07/01/2004 00:00:00#")
> Dim dt2 As New DataTable
> dt2 = dt.Clone
> For Each dr1 As DataRow In dr
> dt2.ImportRow(dr1)
> Next
> DataGrid1.DataSource = dt2
> End Sub
> ///
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> Cor
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Implementing SELECT DISTINCT with DataTable.Select method Andrea Caldarone Microsoft ADO .NET 2 30th Jan 2007 09:28 AM
Retrieving datarows using DataTable.Select method and adding it to new DataTable C.Anand via DotNetMonster.com Microsoft ADO .NET 4 4th Apr 2005 05:21 PM
RE: DataTable.Select method bug (?) with .net framework 1.1 SP1 =?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?= Microsoft ADO .NET 19 1st Mar 2005 12:18 AM
DataTable.Select method bug in .Net Framework 1.1 SP1 and in KB891 =?Utf-8?B?bHluY2g=?= Microsoft ADO .NET 1 26th Feb 2005 05:29 AM
Re: DataTable.Select method bug (?) with .net framework 1.1 SP1 Jon Skeet [C# MVP] Microsoft ADO .NET 1 9th Sep 2004 10:19 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.