Hey there,

I am looping over a dataset created from the "readxml" method and there
seems to be a problem when it gets to a node that has just one child
for example:

This block yields the correct result and is translated as a proper
table with columns and rows:
<Bugs>
<Bug>56</Bug>
<Bug>51</Bug>
</Bugs>

This block just gets treated as a column and no rows.

<Bugs>
<Bug>56</Bug>
</Bugs>

Am i missing something or is this a bug in the framework?

Seems like they should get treated the same way.

Thanks for any insight!

that is the way it works - in the 1st case there is no cue to tell the
parser that bugs is a row collection as opposed to a single row
to get the required result use a .xsd schema



"th3dude" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hey there,
>
> I am looping over a dataset created from the "readxml" method and there
> seems to be a problem when it gets to a node that has just one child
> for example:
>
> This block yields the correct result and is translated as a proper
> table with columns and rows:
> <Bugs>
> <Bug>56</Bug>
> <Bug>51</Bug>
> </Bugs>
>
> This block just gets treated as a column and no rows.
>
> <Bugs>
> <Bug>56</Bug>
> </Bugs>
>
> Am i missing something or is this a bug in the framework?
>
> Seems like they should get treated the same way.
>
> Thanks for any insight!
>

hey gerry,

thanks for clarifying this for me. i figured it had to be standard
functionality now i just need to adapt a .xsd.

cheers!

gerry wrote:
> that is the way it works - in the 1st case there is no cue to tell the
> parser that bugs is a row collection as opposed to a single row
> to get the required result use a .xsd schema
>
>
>
> "th3dude" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hey there,
> >
> > I am looping over a dataset created from the "readxml" method and there
> > seems to be a problem when it gets to a node that has just one child
> > for example:
> >
> > This block yields the correct result and is translated as a proper
> > table with columns and rows:
> > <Bugs>
> > <Bug>56</Bug>
> > <Bug>51</Bug>
> > </Bugs>
> >
> > This block just gets treated as a column and no rows.
> >
> > <Bugs>
> > <Bug>56</Bug>
> > </Bugs>
> >
> > Am i missing something or is this a bug in the framework?
> >
> > Seems like they should get treated the same way.
> >
> > Thanks for any insight!
> >