Julian
Reinstalling on dynamic disks, and deleting/recreating a volume during
this, is one of the most common reasons why people loose data from dynamic
disks.
Those two MS Knowledge Base articles explains more:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=227364
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=236086
Perhaps MS PSS could help, or a third party recovery firm.
Best regards
Bjorn
--
Bjorn Landemoo -
(E-Mail Removed) -
http://landemoo.com/
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Networking
Julian Voelcker <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Our server is configured with 3 x 17Gb drives configured as dynamic
>disks with the following drives:
>C: 5Gb mirrored partition at start of Disk 0 and Disk 1
>D: 24Gb Win2k Software Raid 5 partition made up of 12Gb partition at
>end of Disk 0 and Disk 1 and start of Disk 2
>E: 5Gb partition at the end of Disk 2.
>
>We had problems re-installing the OS on the C drive and ended up
>deleting the partition during the win2k setup. This worked, however
>seems to have messed up the Raid-5 D drive.
>
>We have now managed to recover the C drive and it's mirror, but the
>Raid partitions on Disk 0 and Disk 1 are appearing as unallocated in
>the disk manager. The RAID partition on Drive 2 is still there, but
>marked as failed.
>
>Further down in disk manager there appears to be two drives marked as
>'Missing' - they are what I would expect to see on disk 0 and disk 1 -
>a 5gb mirror on the first partition and then a 12gb raid partition.
>
>Trying to recover these 'Missing' configs fails, although the fact that
>they are still appearing gives me hope that we can do something to
>recover the three raid partitions.
>
>I suppose the question is, what is the best thing to do to recover the
>data on the raid-5 drive d:?
>
>The route I am currently pursuing is trying to find where the data
>relating to the 'Missing' drives is stored to see if there is any way
>to tie it to the relevant drives.
>
>I have already got most tools I might need, it's mainly a case of
>working out what to do with them next.
>
>Any pointers would be appreciated.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Julian Voelcker
>