Is it possible to change priorities from the 3 choices "low, normal, high" to
4 new field descriptions - such as "important and urgent", "important but not
urgent", "urgent but not important" and "not urgent and not important"

No, but you could prefix your task subject with a word or number like this:

ImpUrg: Call Jason
ImpUrg: File taxes
Imp: Meeting with Susan
ImpUrg: Send Invoice
Urg: Call Mike
Imp: Order new envelopes
NI: New lunch menus

I might actually use numbers instead: 1-4 so that they sort more readily in
order of priority.


--
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP
Roland Schorr & Tower
http://www.rolandschorr.com
http://www.officeforlawyers.com/outlook.htm


"Michael" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:27054C0E-CA5D-4826-BCF5-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is it possible to change priorities from the 3 choices "low, normal, high"
> to
> 4 new field descriptions - such as "important and urgent", "important but
> not
> urgent", "urgent but not important" and "not urgent and not important"

Not Important Not Urgent = DELETE.

Don't make those into Tasks.

Judy Gleeson
MVP Outlook
Trainer and Consultant

read my articles here: www.judygleeson.com
Canberra, Australia

how to post questions: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555375

"Ben M. Schorr, MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:5FEE1297-B722-4FEF-9928-(E-Mail Removed)...
> No, but you could prefix your task subject with a word or number like
> this:
>
> ImpUrg: Call Jason
> ImpUrg: File taxes
> Imp: Meeting with Susan
> ImpUrg: Send Invoice
> Urg: Call Mike
> Imp: Order new envelopes
> NI: New lunch menus
>
> I might actually use numbers instead: 1-4 so that they sort more readily
> in order of priority.
>
>
> --
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP
> Roland Schorr & Tower
> http://www.rolandschorr.com
> http://www.officeforlawyers.com/outlook.htm
>
>
> "Michael" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:27054C0E-CA5D-4826-BCF5-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Is it possible to change priorities from the 3 choices "low, normal,
>> high" to
>> 4 new field descriptions - such as "important and urgent", "important but
>> not
>> urgent", "urgent but not important" and "not urgent and not important"
>