I asked this question of Murray on 9th February:

>Of course. You would have to change the rule for the hover
correspondingly.

Then how would you have changed the rule for the hover correspondingly?

An answer would be a great favour.

Murray wrote:
>> For interest you may wish to look at the source.
> Did you think I didn't?
>>> Why not just make them display:none?
>> I tried the above line and mouseover the thumbnails fails to display their
>> images.
> Of course. You would have to change the rule for the hover correspondingly.
>
>>> I don't think I would do it that way, but it's a clever application.
>> That begs the question as to how you would do it? {8;-))
>
> I would do it the way I suggested.
>
>

I would suggest starting a new thread with the subject: "Ping Murray, hover question"


--
Steve Easton
Microsoft MVP FrontPage
FP Cleaner
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/fpclean.htm
Hit Me FP
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/HitMeFP.htm
Coming Soon: Function5 Auto Refresh

"Malcolm Walker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I asked this question of Murray on 9th February:
>
> >Of course. You would have to change the rule for the hover
> correspondingly.
>
> Then how would you have changed the rule for the hover correspondingly?
>
> An answer would be a great favour.
>
> Murray wrote:
>>> For interest you may wish to look at the source.
>> Did you think I didn't?
>>>> Why not just make them display:none?
>>> I tried the above line and mouseover the thumbnails fails to display their images.
>> Of course. You would have to change the rule for the hover correspondingly.
>>
>>>> I don't think I would do it that way, but it's a clever application.
>>> That begs the question as to how you would do it? {8;-))
>>
>> I would do it the way I suggested.
>>
>>

Thank you - will do.

Steve Easton wrote:
> I would suggest starting a new thread with the subject: "Ping Murray, hover question"
>
>
>