That is the problem with referencing and with major changes, ie moving an
image drastically within the document.
I have not come across an automatic editor, so not sure what that intails.
All the best
DeanH
"Peter T. Daniels" wrote:
> A disadvantage to doing it that way is if you change the content and
> want the reference to fig. 2 to be somewhere else. Or, an automatic
> editor might think there's no reference to fig. 2 and try to delete
> it!
>
> On Jul 7, 2:08 am, DeanH <De...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Peter, I tend to display "Figures 1, 2 and 3" not "1 - 2", so the link for
> > Fig. 2 is still active for the reader of the electronic document.
> > If the document is only to be distributed as hardcopy then I would do as you
> > say, which I forgot to mention :-( and type the dash but would forget the
> > figure 2 x-ref all together.
> > All the best
> > Deanh
> >
> >
> >
> > "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:
> > > But you'll have to format the x-ref to fig. 2 as Hidden, and type the
> > > en-dash yourself.
> >
> > > On Jul 6, 10:35 am, DeanH <De...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > > Add \# 0 to the field code, such as { REF _Ref234657595 \# 0 \h} this will
> > > > only show the number.
> > > > Hope this helps.
> > > > DeanH
> >
> > > > "Duncan" wrote:
> > > > > is there a way of instead of cross referencing figure1, figure 2 and figure 3.
> >
> > > > > to cross-reference figures 1-3 ?
> >
> > > > > I know that endnote supports this with it's references.
> >
> > > > > does ms have something similar for captions?--
>
|
Similar Threads
