my userenv file looks like this:
USERENV(1d8.1dc) 15:03:28:361 Profile was loaded but the Ref Count is 1 !!!
USERENV(1d8.f0) 15:03:28:820 GetGPOInfo: Local GPO's gpt.ini is not
accessible, assuming default state.
USERENV(1d8.1dc) 15:04:25:235 UnloadUserProfileP: Didn't unload user profile
<err = 19>
USERENV(1d8.200) 15:04:38:064 ProcessGPOs: Loopback is not allowed for
downlevel or local user accounts. Loopback will be disabled.
USERENV(1d8.200) 15:04:38:064 GetGPOInfo: Local GPO's gpt.ini is not
accessible, assuming default state.
USERENV(1d8.1dc) 15:05:56:581 Profile was loaded but the Ref Count is 1 !!!
USERENV(1d8.7ac) 15:05:59:199 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with
1355.
USERENV(1d8.7ac) 15:05:59:698 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with
1355.
USERENV(1d8.7ac) 15:06:00:198 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with
1355.
USERENV(1d8.7ac) 15:06:00:697 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with
1355.
USERENV(1d8.7ac) 15:06:00:697 ProcessGPOs: MyGetUserName failed with 1355.
"Jay" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> MS says:
>
> Replace mode
> In this mode, the list of GPOs for the user is not gathered. Instead, only
> the list of GPOs based on the computer object is used. The User
> Configuration settings from this list are applied to the user.
>
> MY GPO is set for REPLACE in loopback processing. It seems like the GP
> processing on the client PC is indeed trying to get the GP info for the
> user (which is in the parent domain, and not accessible). It then aborts.
> Is there a 'on error rusume next' option. 
>
> Basically I want to set the 'user' options in a GPO to these clients but
> allow them to authenticate using IDs that live in the parent domain. I
> don't want to expose my parent DCs to these workstations, however.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> "Jay" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I am getting an error on the client event log:
>>
>> Windows cannot obtain the domain controller name for your computer
>> network. (The specified domain either does not exist or could not be
>> contacted. ). Group Policy processing aborted.
>>
>> Here is my setup: the clients on ac.lu.edu have access to a DC/DNS
>> server, which is AD integrated for that zone. ac.lu.edu is the child
>> domain of lu.edu, but I don't want the clients on ac.lu.edu to be able to
>> resolve all my 'internal' systems, which are hosted on the lu.edu name
>> servers. Consider the following:
>>
>> dc1.lu.edu
>>
>> dc_ac.lu.edu
>>
>> dc_ac.lu.edu has the zone for ac.lu.edu. dc1.lu.edu has the zone for
>> lu.edu and a delegated zone for ac.lu.edu, which points to dc_ac.lu.edu.
>>
>> Does a client on the child domain have to be able to see the DCs (sysvol,
>> I would guess) of the parent to get this group policy config to work? I
>> don't really need to get the GPOs for the parent (the user) since I am
>> using loopback processing for all these workstations.
>>
>> Thanks for any input.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Roger Abell [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> It should work without issue. Check the security group filtering
>>> of the GPO to make sure it is still at Authenticated Users. Perhaps
>>> also check that the part of the GPO in sysvol can be read by the
>>> Authenticated Users group instead of ac.lu.edu\domain users
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>> "Jay" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>I have a parent domain, lu.edu, and a child domain, ac.lu.edu
>>>>
>>>> My user accounts live in the parent (lu.edu) - I want my users to be
>>>> able to use their normal name/password to access a computer lab, where
>>>> the client computers are members of the ac.lu.edu domain. Right now I
>>>> have an OU in ac.lu.edu and a GPO applied to it. I am using loopback
>>>> processing, since I want to restrict the desktop regardless of which
>>>> user logs on.
>>>>
>>>> When I log on as a user from lu.edu it logs on OK, but I don't get the
>>>> loopback policy applied. If I log on to a user that lives in ac.lu.edu
>>>> (as a test) I get the loopback. Since the GPO applies to the computer
>>>> object, which is in the child domain, it seems to me this should work.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>
>