"Maximus" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpcbjg$93f$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Ken Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bpc6mi$1n4dul$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > "Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But
during
> > > creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased?
In
> > > other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then
add
> > the
> > > other drive and have it copy the data to it?
> >
>
>
> > In theory you can do this, i.e. use an existing drive with data and have
> the
> > data copied onto the 2nd drive as a mirror. At least that is what the
> > manual and the help file coming with the P4P800 indicates, regarding the
> Via
> > controller within.
> >
> > I tried to do exactly this while setting up the array on my new board
> > several days ago. Windows 2000 apparently never had a chance to read
this
> > manual and somehow in the setup process the partitions on both drives
were
> > deleted. In fact, it took me more than a few minutes to realize why the
> > drives in my newly created array didn't show up in Windows Explorer.
The
> > reason was that they had no partitions any longer and hence were not
> > formatted.
> >
> > What I'm saying is I think there is a way to do this however the process
> is
> > counterintuitive, or at least it was to me.
> >
> > Fortunately, I had the data all backed up, plus I ghosted it before I
> > attempted this.
> >
> > I suggest that you try to do this, e.g. set up the array with existing
> data
> > on a drive. But, don't depend on it. Have all your data backed up, so
> that
> > if the system eliminates your partitions and your data by extension --
> that
> > it is just a minor inconvenience. Then, you can just format the drives
> > (they will show up as just 1 drive because they are a mirror set) and
put
> > your data back on them.
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > ken
> > p.s. my suspicion is that you will end up with a cleaner install and a
> > "better" mirror if you just forget about this, let the partitions be
> > deleted, then put your data back on the drives. In that case, you will
> get
> > a perfect copy on both drives.
> >
>
> That is why I do not bother to have RAID in my PC. Just buy another IDE
hard
> disk,
> copying all files and data needed to backup, and probably some ghosted
CDs,
> etc.
> then I can rest without worry.
>
I think the whole idea of a RAID array only makes sense if you have a
minimum of 3 drives; the first being a system disk with the OS on it, and
the latter 2 being the RAID array with your data. The whole idea of a
private person at home having a RAID array in their home PC would have been
pretty ridiculous even a year ago, but now, with HD prices so cheap as to be
laughable, especially after some of those outrageous rebate deals, it is
do-able.
But my suspicion (untested) is that a RAID array for a 2 disk system,
especially a RAID type "1" setup, would be pretty slow. If all you have is
data on the RAID disks, however, I doubt you would notice any speed
decrement.
If you want to REALLY go overboard, do what I just did; set up a 4 disk
system with disks 3 + 4 being the RAID "1" array, disk 1 being the OS disk,
and disk 2 being a repository for regular ghost images. Norton Ghost (or
other disk imaging programs) work extremely fast across a system bus. I can
image my system disk in several minutes so it is pretty painless. If you
ghost your OS disk every week or so, you are protected from most any
calamity short of a housefire, and of course the RAID "1" protects your data
itself.
ken
|