PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Creating RAID 1 Array: Will it wipe out existing data?

 
 
Randy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But during
creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased? In
other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then add the
other drive and have it copy the data to it?


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ken Fox
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
"Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But during
> creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased? In
> other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then add

the
> other drive and have it copy the data to it?



In theory you can do this, i.e. use an existing drive with data and have the
data copied onto the 2nd drive as a mirror. At least that is what the
manual and the help file coming with the P4P800 indicates, regarding the Via
controller within.

I tried to do exactly this while setting up the array on my new board
several days ago. Windows 2000 apparently never had a chance to read this
manual and somehow in the setup process the partitions on both drives were
deleted. In fact, it took me more than a few minutes to realize why the
drives in my newly created array didn't show up in Windows Explorer. The
reason was that they had no partitions any longer and hence were not
formatted.

What I'm saying is I think there is a way to do this however the process is
counterintuitive, or at least it was to me.

Fortunately, I had the data all backed up, plus I ghosted it before I
attempted this.

I suggest that you try to do this, e.g. set up the array with existing data
on a drive. But, don't depend on it. Have all your data backed up, so that
if the system eliminates your partitions and your data by extension -- that
it is just a minor inconvenience. Then, you can just format the drives
(they will show up as just 1 drive because they are a mirror set) and put
your data back on them.

Good luck.

ken
p.s. my suspicion is that you will end up with a cleaner install and a
"better" mirror if you just forget about this, let the partitions be
deleted, then put your data back on the drives. In that case, you will get
a perfect copy on both drives.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Maximus
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003

"Ken Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpc6mi$1n4dul$(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But during
> > creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased? In
> > other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then add

> the
> > other drive and have it copy the data to it?

>



> In theory you can do this, i.e. use an existing drive with data and have

the
> data copied onto the 2nd drive as a mirror. At least that is what the
> manual and the help file coming with the P4P800 indicates, regarding the

Via
> controller within.
>
> I tried to do exactly this while setting up the array on my new board
> several days ago. Windows 2000 apparently never had a chance to read this
> manual and somehow in the setup process the partitions on both drives were
> deleted. In fact, it took me more than a few minutes to realize why the
> drives in my newly created array didn't show up in Windows Explorer. The
> reason was that they had no partitions any longer and hence were not
> formatted.
>
> What I'm saying is I think there is a way to do this however the process

is
> counterintuitive, or at least it was to me.
>
> Fortunately, I had the data all backed up, plus I ghosted it before I
> attempted this.
>
> I suggest that you try to do this, e.g. set up the array with existing

data
> on a drive. But, don't depend on it. Have all your data backed up, so

that
> if the system eliminates your partitions and your data by extension --

that
> it is just a minor inconvenience. Then, you can just format the drives
> (they will show up as just 1 drive because they are a mirror set) and put
> your data back on them.
>
> Good luck.
>
> ken
> p.s. my suspicion is that you will end up with a cleaner install and a
> "better" mirror if you just forget about this, let the partitions be
> deleted, then put your data back on the drives. In that case, you will

get
> a perfect copy on both drives.
>


That is why I do not bother to have RAID in my PC. Just buy another IDE hard
disk,
copying all files and data needed to backup, and probably some ghosted CDs,
etc.
then I can rest without worry.






 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Fox
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
"Maximus" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpcbjg$93f$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Ken Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bpc6mi$1n4dul$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > "Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But

during
> > > creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased?

In
> > > other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then

add
> > the
> > > other drive and have it copy the data to it?

> >

>
>
> > In theory you can do this, i.e. use an existing drive with data and have

> the
> > data copied onto the 2nd drive as a mirror. At least that is what the
> > manual and the help file coming with the P4P800 indicates, regarding the

> Via
> > controller within.
> >
> > I tried to do exactly this while setting up the array on my new board
> > several days ago. Windows 2000 apparently never had a chance to read

this
> > manual and somehow in the setup process the partitions on both drives

were
> > deleted. In fact, it took me more than a few minutes to realize why the
> > drives in my newly created array didn't show up in Windows Explorer.

The
> > reason was that they had no partitions any longer and hence were not
> > formatted.
> >
> > What I'm saying is I think there is a way to do this however the process

> is
> > counterintuitive, or at least it was to me.
> >
> > Fortunately, I had the data all backed up, plus I ghosted it before I
> > attempted this.
> >
> > I suggest that you try to do this, e.g. set up the array with existing

> data
> > on a drive. But, don't depend on it. Have all your data backed up, so

> that
> > if the system eliminates your partitions and your data by extension --

> that
> > it is just a minor inconvenience. Then, you can just format the drives
> > (they will show up as just 1 drive because they are a mirror set) and

put
> > your data back on them.
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > ken
> > p.s. my suspicion is that you will end up with a cleaner install and a
> > "better" mirror if you just forget about this, let the partitions be
> > deleted, then put your data back on the drives. In that case, you will

> get
> > a perfect copy on both drives.
> >

>
> That is why I do not bother to have RAID in my PC. Just buy another IDE

hard
> disk,
> copying all files and data needed to backup, and probably some ghosted

CDs,
> etc.
> then I can rest without worry.
>


I think the whole idea of a RAID array only makes sense if you have a
minimum of 3 drives; the first being a system disk with the OS on it, and
the latter 2 being the RAID array with your data. The whole idea of a
private person at home having a RAID array in their home PC would have been
pretty ridiculous even a year ago, but now, with HD prices so cheap as to be
laughable, especially after some of those outrageous rebate deals, it is
do-able.

But my suspicion (untested) is that a RAID array for a 2 disk system,
especially a RAID type "1" setup, would be pretty slow. If all you have is
data on the RAID disks, however, I doubt you would notice any speed
decrement.

If you want to REALLY go overboard, do what I just did; set up a 4 disk
system with disks 3 + 4 being the RAID "1" array, disk 1 being the OS disk,
and disk 2 being a repository for regular ghost images. Norton Ghost (or
other disk imaging programs) work extremely fast across a system bus. I can
image my system disk in several minutes so it is pretty painless. If you
ghost your OS disk every week or so, you are protected from most any
calamity short of a housefire, and of course the RAID "1" protects your data
itself.

ken


 
Reply With Quote
 
Christian Merkle
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
Randy wrote:
> I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But during
> creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased? In
> other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then add the
> other drive and have it copy the data to it?


Yes, thatīs no problem with Promise RAID-Controllers Asus is using on
their motherboards. Should be possible with RAID-Controllers from Intel too.

Christian
 
Reply With Quote
 
RD
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
Hi Ken,
"Ken Fox" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpcclp$1m1aal$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> I think the whole idea of a RAID array only makes sense if you have a
> minimum of 3 drives; the first being a system disk with the OS on it, and
> the latter 2 being the RAID array with your data. The whole idea of a
> private person at home having a RAID array in their home PC would have

been
> pretty ridiculous even a year ago, but now, with HD prices so cheap as to

be
> laughable, especially after some of those outrageous rebate deals, it is
> do-able.

Given the prices of 'fairly' small ata133 drives these days and that some
folks seem willing to spend Ģ300 or so on a graphics card:-), it seems to
me that 4 x 80gig PATA or SATA drives in a raid 1+0 array would be
ideal if one had another ATA drive on a non raid controller to boot from
so there would be better data security and the ability to chose to boot
from either the raid setup or a non raid one:-)

> But my suspicion (untested) is that a RAID array for a 2 disk system,
> especially a RAID type "1" setup, would be pretty slow. If all you have

is
> data on the RAID disks, however, I doubt you would notice any speed
> decrement.


Do you think there would be any real slowdoen in a raid 1+0 array, as
one part would be striped and that would be mirrored?

I've run a small 20gig striped set, with another drive on the 2nd port
to boot from, but there was always the worry that one drive in the
stripe might go down thus loosing the lot apart from my boot drive..
Now I have ended up with 2 raid controllers, one ata100 and one
SATA150:-) But only PATA drives... I guess it may be time to
organise a small xmas pressie for my rig:-) 4 x SATA drives to
see what they perform like..

RD


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Fox
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
"RD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bpcj7e$6hm$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Ken,
>>

> Do you think there would be any real slowdoen in a raid 1+0 array, as
> one part would be striped and that would be mirrored?


Hi,

I'm no expert on this stuff so hopefully someone who is can give guidance.
It took some bumbling around for me to even figure out how to get the RAID 1
set up, and if I hadn't recently purchased a whole bunch of drives with huge
multi-rebates, I'd never have done it in the first place.

>
> I've run a small 20gig striped set, with another drive on the 2nd port
> to boot from, but there was always the worry that one drive in the
> stripe might go down thus loosing the lot apart from my boot drive..
> Now I have ended up with 2 raid controllers, one ata100 and one
> SATA150:-) But only PATA drives... I guess it may be time to
> organise a small xmas pressie for my rig:-) 4 x SATA drives to
> see what they perform like..
>
> RD
>
>


I think that the major benefits of SATA drives are yet to be implimented.
At current speeds of 150 they are only slightly faster than the ATA 133 IDEs
being sold now.

Good luck,

ken


 
Reply With Quote
 
Randy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
I did a "dry run" with a pair of SATA drives using the RAID utility built
into the Via chipset. The first warning it gave me when starting to
"create" the RAID 1 array was "all existing data on BOTH drives will be
deleted."


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Fox
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Nov 2003
"Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I did a "dry run" with a pair of SATA drives using the RAID utility built
> into the Via chipset. The first warning it gave me when starting to
> "create" the RAID 1 array was "all existing data on BOTH drives will be
> deleted."
>
>


the screens that appear in the helpfile did not occur on my desktop no
matter what I tried.

good luck


 
Reply With Quote
 
DaveW
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      19th Nov 2003
No.

--
DaveW



"Randy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I know that you can add a drive after the array is created. But during
> creation of a RAID 1 array, will the data on both drives be erased? In
> other words: can you use an existing HD to create a RAID array then add

the
> other drive and have it copy the data to it?
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Data recovery, existing raid 0 array on new motherboard Paul Computer Hardware 1 1st Jun 2010 05:42 AM
Re: Data recovery, existing raid 0 array on new motherboard Geoff Computer Hardware 1 21st May 2010 11:58 AM
Re: Data recovery, existing raid 0 array on new motherboard Paul Computer Hardware 3 20th May 2010 05:03 AM
Motherboard & Existing RAID array avocation@gmail.com DIY PC 1 2nd Jan 2009 03:30 PM
RAID install on an existing array using RC1 (32+64) tcpaulh Windows Vista General Discussion 7 5th Sep 2006 04:21 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 AM.