On Feb 2, 9:14*am, Beverley Moysey <ali_webit...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 8:39*pm, VanguardLH <V...@nguard.LH> wrote:
>
> > alicorn2 wrote:
> > > I'm looking for kind of the opposite of creating aruleto auto-forward
> > > emails. *I want to create arulethat acts on RECEIVED auto-forwardedemails,
> > > but not any that were manually forwarded or replied to by the same person.
>
> > > E.g. Jim forwards me all emails with "blah" in the subject, and I want to
> > > move those auto forwards to my "Jim's auto-forwards" folder, but if he
> > > forwards me a message manually that says "blah" but he adds his own comments,
> > > I want it to stay in my inbox.
>
> > Just what do you expect to test on in a received e-mail to detect that it
> > was automatically forwarded versus manually forwarded? *There is nothing
> > that goes into an e-mail by RFC standards that is mandated to identify any
> > automatic forwarding. *
>
> Well,Outlookseems to know that it is auto forwarded, as it shows up
> as such when you view the email. *Just above the "From" section but
> just below the ribbon, it says something like:
>
> This message wasAutoForwarded.
> Extra line breaks in this message were removed.
>
> So ifOutlookcan tell it wasAutoForwardedin order to give me that
> message, then it is something I should be able to test for in arule
> condition. It's an Exchange Server if that helps.
Your mileage may vary, but in my own setup the email arrives with the
words "Auto forwarded by a Rule" in the message body. I test for the
"From" email address and the existence of these words and process
accordingly.
Of course, there's nothing to stop these rules from catching the
phrase from a quoted email in the email text and misfiring, but in my
case this isn't an issue.
Much warmth,
planetthoughtful
---
"Lost in thought"
http://www.planetthoughtful.org