Maybe to some, but not to all.
Dave
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news

(E-Mail Removed)...
| On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 20:47:14 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
| <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
|
| >August 04, New Scientist -- Country-coded computer worms may be ahead. Jonathan
| >Wignall of the UK's Data and Network Security Research Council highlighted
| >techniques that worm creators might use to make their code spread more
| >effectively during a presentation at the security conference Defcon 11 in Las
| >Vegas, NV, on Sunday, August 3. One of these techniques could also limit a
| >worm's geographic range, which would turn a computer worm into an effective
| >weapon for information warfare, he said. Instead of attacking internet?connected
| >computers at random it could be used to attack a specific country. After
| >infecting a host computer, a worm normally scans randomly for further machines
| >that could be infected. But Wignall says a worm could download a prepared list
| >of internet rotocol (IP) addresses to attack from a single server or a group of
| >machines. This would prevent duplicate requests being sent to each machine, a
| >common cause of bottlenecking with existing worm design. Nicholas Weaver, a
| >computer scientist at the University of California in Berkeley says this is just
| >one way that a worm could, in theory, be used to target a specific country.
| >Another way is to avoid computers running a particular language, he says.
| >
| >Source:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994016
|
| <yawn> Seems awfully obvious, doesn't it?
|
| Art
|
http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg