Aaron
See
http://www.tinyurl.com/y2yjzn
and have a look at the first paragraph of page 10 from the Microsoft
document above.
Spreading misinformation? Halfwits?
I am sure other readers (and Microsoft) can do their independent judgement
on their own.
On that note, I think this conversation does not contribute positively in a
professional business manner that we should accord other readers so I will
end it here.
--
HTH
Van T. Dinh
MVP (Access)
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Van
>
> I really want to know where you hear that.
>
> Some renegade developers that worked at Microsoft might have said that
> as an offhand remark.
>
> But it has never officially been stated.
>
> In 2007; there has been much excitement about the next version of ADP..
> it is definitely alive and well.
>
> There has been one COMMENT on a SINGLE BLOG about how ONE PERSON
> reccomends that you use MDB with linked tables.
>
> But I dont agree with that person.
>
> Linked tables are a ****ing logistical nightmare.
> Awful performance. Awful stability. Awful deployment and
> troubleshooting.
>
> Refresh, Relink, Create Link
>
> GAG, GAG, GAG
>
> copy queries? not necessary-- keep everything in SQL Server and use an
> ADP and you dont have ANY of the deployment complexities that you have
> in MDB.
>
> I just strongly-- violently-- argue that MVP shouldn't spread
> misinformation.
>
> I urge Microsoft to stop rewarding halfwits the MVP recognition.
>
> -Aaron
>
>