PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

cookie a threat /not a threat? need some answer on this

 
 
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Aug 2005
as you all know by now that most standalone antispyware
utilities include cookie detection. But some Antispyware
utilities refuses to add such features because they
believe it's not a threat. So this confuses many people
who's right and wrong and who to believe because many
people have different perspective on cookie.

IS COOKIE A Threat or NOT A Threat? It won't hurt your
computer at all but it will collect informations.




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Aug 2005
Please check the following link to get an answer on Tracking Cookies and
Microsoft AntiSpyware:
http://blogs.technet.com/stevedod/ar...23/378972.aspx
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:008001c5a1f6$31f51820$(E-Mail Removed)...
> as you all know by now that most standalone antispyware
> utilities include cookie detection. But some Antispyware
> utilities refuses to add such features because they
> believe it's not a threat. So this confuses many people
> who's right and wrong and who to believe because many
> people have different perspective on cookie.
>
> IS COOKIE A Threat or NOT A Threat? It won't hurt your
> computer at all but it will collect informations.
>
>
>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Alan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Aug 2005
Most cookies, like the ones used by Google, Yahoo, and
MSN are used to store personal preferences, nothing
more. These cookies make it possible to store the
preferences for that domain on your system, have the
domain access the cookie and use it to set the
preferences so you don't have to re-enter your prefered
settings. Take the settings for google.com, if you
removed the cookie for google, you will have to change
the preferences to what you want, have google store the
cookie on your system and then use it. This is the same
for the other two domains as well, not to mention
thousands more domains.

The cookies that are a threat are those that store
personally identifiable information. These cookies can
lead to identity theft. The real purpose for using an
antispyware application is to help prevent this from
happening.

Most tracking cookies are third-party in nature, meaning
they are from another host domain than the one you are
visiting. Usually these cookies are from advertisers the
web site's owner(s) have sold space on their pages for
advertising purposes. This is how many of these sites
recoup the money they are spending developing and running
the site. The thing about these type of cookies is,
unless they contain personally identifiable information,
they only can dislose your surfing habits to the
advertiser who stored the cookie on your system. One big
note is that only the host domain that stored the cookie
on your system can read it. However, you will hear
things to the contrary, just don't buy into this
rubbish. The way the cookie is stored tells your web
browser who stored it, hence who has access to read it.
Some security flaws regarding cookies might have existed
in the past, but new browsers have patched these security
flaws. This means that the cookie can only be read by
the host domain that stored it on your system, as I said
earlier.

Alan

>-----Original Message-----
>as you all know by now that most standalone antispyware
>utilities include cookie detection. But some Antispyware
>utilities refuses to add such features because they
>believe it's not a threat. So this confuses many people
>who's right and wrong and who to believe because many
>people have different perspective on cookie.
>
>IS COOKIE A Threat or NOT A Threat? It won't hurt your
>computer at all but it will collect informations.
>
>
>
>
>.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Aug 2005
Cookies can also store information to automatically log you into a members
page for sites like the Science Fiction Book Club (www.sfbc.com).

Cookies can only be used for identity theft if you already gave that
information to a questionable site that stored that information in the
cookie. They cannot interrogate the computer for the information. in
fact, they cannot do anything by themselves.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE
Please respond in Newsgroup. Do not send email
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Protect your PC
http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/


"Alan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:044501c5a21b$3c87b2f0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Most cookies, like the ones used by Google, Yahoo, and
> MSN are used to store personal preferences, nothing
> more. These cookies make it possible to store the
> preferences for that domain on your system, have the
> domain access the cookie and use it to set the
> preferences so you don't have to re-enter your prefered
> settings. Take the settings for google.com, if you
> removed the cookie for google, you will have to change
> the preferences to what you want, have google store the
> cookie on your system and then use it. This is the same
> for the other two domains as well, not to mention
> thousands more domains.
>
> The cookies that are a threat are those that store
> personally identifiable information. These cookies can
> lead to identity theft. The real purpose for using an
> antispyware application is to help prevent this from
> happening.
>
> Most tracking cookies are third-party in nature, meaning
> they are from another host domain than the one you are
> visiting. Usually these cookies are from advertisers the
> web site's owner(s) have sold space on their pages for
> advertising purposes. This is how many of these sites
> recoup the money they are spending developing and running
> the site. The thing about these type of cookies is,
> unless they contain personally identifiable information,
> they only can dislose your surfing habits to the
> advertiser who stored the cookie on your system. One big
> note is that only the host domain that stored the cookie
> on your system can read it. However, you will hear
> things to the contrary, just don't buy into this
> rubbish. The way the cookie is stored tells your web
> browser who stored it, hence who has access to read it.
> Some security flaws regarding cookies might have existed
> in the past, but new browsers have patched these security
> flaws. This means that the cookie can only be read by
> the host domain that stored it on your system, as I said
> earlier.
>
> Alan
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>as you all know by now that most standalone antispyware
>>utilities include cookie detection. But some Antispyware
>>utilities refuses to add such features because they
>>believe it's not a threat. So this confuses many people
>>who's right and wrong and who to believe because many
>>people have different perspective on cookie.
>>
>>IS COOKIE A Threat or NOT A Threat? It won't hurt your
>>computer at all but it will collect informations.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
threat 2 PC andy Windows Vista Security 2 6th Jul 2008 01:12 AM
low threat tracking cookie Theron Spyware Application Compatibility 2 20th Aug 2005 12:38 AM
possible threat malcolm Windows XP General 2 9th Jul 2004 09:35 PM
UI Threat XingZheng Microsoft Dot NET Framework 3 27th May 2004 03:38 PM
threat =?Utf-8?B?THVsdS5C?= Windows XP General 6 17th Jan 2004 09:47 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.