Hello all,

I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to convert to x
amount of threads:

For i = 0 To 100
For j = 0 To 100
For k = 0 To 100
Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
Next
Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
Next
Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
Next

This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking well over
1 hour to complete.

Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
multithreading, say 10 threads at once?

Hi Richard,

I don't have the code, but this raises an interesting question to me.

Doing 10 things simultaneously isn't necessary quicker and may actually be
slower... right or wrong?
Unless in each thread there is some latency time that the thread must wait
for I/O or something that another thread might be operating. Because unless
you have more than one processor, nothing actually happens at the same time,
just the process's time is divided per thread... am I right on this?

Sorry I don't have the code.. but also wanted to know an answer to my
question about your question.

Shane
"Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello all,
>
> I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to convert to
x
> amount of threads:
>
> For i = 0 To 100
> For j = 0 To 100
> For k = 0 To 100
> Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
> Next
> Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
> Next
> Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
> Next
>
> This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking well
over
> 1 hour to complete.
>
> Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
> multithreading, say 10 threads at once?
>
>

Hello,

Yes, I am waiting for something to complete between loops.

"SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uyc2%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Richard,
>
> I don't have the code, but this raises an interesting question to me.
>
> Doing 10 things simultaneously isn't necessary quicker and may actually be
> slower... right or wrong?
> Unless in each thread there is some latency time that the thread must wait
> for I/O or something that another thread might be operating. Because
unless
> you have more than one processor, nothing actually happens at the same
time,
> just the process's time is divided per thread... am I right on this?
>
> Sorry I don't have the code.. but also wanted to know an answer to my
> question about your question.
>
> Shane
> "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to convert
to
> x
> > amount of threads:
> >
> > For i = 0 To 100
> > For j = 0 To 100
> > For k = 0 To 100
> > Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
> > Next
> > Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
> > Next
> > Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
> > Next
> >
> > This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking well
> over
> > 1 hour to complete.
> >
> > Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
> > multithreading, say 10 threads at once?
> >
> >
>
>

In that case, Chapter 19 of the Wrox "Professional VB.NET" book has code
that might be of use on how to do threading and thread pooling.

you can probably download the code from
www.wrox.com

maybe it would give you and idea.

HTH,

Shane
"Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello,
>
> Yes, I am waiting for something to complete between loops.
>
> "SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:uyc2%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > I don't have the code, but this raises an interesting question to me.
> >
> > Doing 10 things simultaneously isn't necessary quicker and may actually
be
> > slower... right or wrong?
> > Unless in each thread there is some latency time that the thread must
wait
> > for I/O or something that another thread might be operating. Because
> unless
> > you have more than one processor, nothing actually happens at the same
> time,
> > just the process's time is divided per thread... am I right on this?
> >
> > Sorry I don't have the code.. but also wanted to know an answer to my
> > question about your question.
> >
> > Shane
> > "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to
convert
> to
> > x
> > > amount of threads:
> > >
> > > For i = 0 To 100
> > > For j = 0 To 100
> > > For k = 0 To 100
> > > Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
> > > Next
> > > Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
> > > Next
> > > Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
> > > Next
> > >
> > > This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking well
> > over
> > > 1 hour to complete.
> > >
> > > Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
> > > multithreading, say 10 threads at once?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Hi Shane,

That is exactly what I'm looking for.

Now all I have to do is dissect their code and apply it to my program.

Thanks!


"SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Oy$VG%(E-Mail Removed)...
> In that case, Chapter 19 of the Wrox "Professional VB.NET" book has code
> that might be of use on how to do threading and thread pooling.
>
> you can probably download the code from
> www.wrox.com
>
> maybe it would give you and idea.
>
> HTH,
>
> Shane
> "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes, I am waiting for something to complete between loops.
> >
> > "SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:uyc2%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > I don't have the code, but this raises an interesting question to me.
> > >
> > > Doing 10 things simultaneously isn't necessary quicker and may
actually
> be
> > > slower... right or wrong?
> > > Unless in each thread there is some latency time that the thread must
> wait
> > > for I/O or something that another thread might be operating. Because
> > unless
> > > you have more than one processor, nothing actually happens at the same
> > time,
> > > just the process's time is divided per thread... am I right on this?
> > >
> > > Sorry I don't have the code.. but also wanted to know an answer to my
> > > question about your question.
> > >
> > > Shane
> > > "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to
> convert
> > to
> > > x
> > > > amount of threads:
> > > >
> > > > For i = 0 To 100
> > > > For j = 0 To 100
> > > > For k = 0 To 100
> > > > Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
> > > > Next
> > > > Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
> > > > Next
> > > > Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
> > > > Next
> > > >
> > > > This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking
well
> > > over
> > > > 1 hour to complete.
> > > >
> > > > Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
> > > > multithreading, say 10 threads at once?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

It is a pretty decent book Not bad for a reference... If you decide to buy
a copy--for sure buy online..the book is like $60 in Books a million but if
you get there discount card and order online it is at least half that price.

Glad to help you,

Shane

"Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Shane,
>
> That is exactly what I'm looking for.
>
> Now all I have to do is dissect their code and apply it to my program.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> "SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:Oy$VG%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > In that case, Chapter 19 of the Wrox "Professional VB.NET" book has code
> > that might be of use on how to do threading and thread pooling.
> >
> > you can probably download the code from
> > www.wrox.com
> >
> > maybe it would give you and idea.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Shane
> > "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Yes, I am waiting for something to complete between loops.
> > >
> > > "SStory" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
> > > news:uyc2%(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > Hi Richard,
> > > >
> > > > I don't have the code, but this raises an interesting question to
me.
> > > >
> > > > Doing 10 things simultaneously isn't necessary quicker and may
> actually
> > be
> > > > slower... right or wrong?
> > > > Unless in each thread there is some latency time that the thread
must
> > wait
> > > > for I/O or something that another thread might be operating.
Because
> > > unless
> > > > you have more than one processor, nothing actually happens at the
same
> > > time,
> > > > just the process's time is divided per thread... am I right on this?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry I don't have the code.. but also wanted to know an answer to
my
> > > > question about your question.
> > > >
> > > > Shane
> > > > "Richard Aubin" <rca_hyip@@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the following nested loop structure that I would love to
> > convert
> > > to
> > > > x
> > > > > amount of threads:
> > > > >
> > > > > For i = 0 To 100
> > > > > For j = 0 To 100
> > > > > For k = 0 To 100
> > > > > Console.WriteLine("k = " & k)
> > > > > Next
> > > > > Console.WriteLine("j = " & j)
> > > > > Next
> > > > > Console.WriteLine("i =" & i)
> > > > > Next
> > > > >
> > > > > This process is based on existing code that I have that is taking
> well
> > > > over
> > > > > 1 hour to complete.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could someone provide me with example code to convert this to
> > > > > multithreading, say 10 threads at once?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>