You're right. The other big advantage is as a central store for files.
If eveyone stores their files on the server it make backup so much
easier. It doesn't really matter how old the server is; an NT4 machine
would still work fine. To my mind you would not gain anything by
ditching your server, but would lose so many options. Why not leave it
on your network, even if it's just a central database of users and for
file and print sharing? If users really don't want to logon to your
server (why?) they can always log on locally.
Kurt wrote:
> altecsole makes a good point. Even with only 5 computers, being able to
> manage user accounts (which means access to files, printers, etc.), group
> policy, control access, change a password if an employee leaves the
> company.....on and on.... ----for all 5 computers and all users with one
> stop at the DC is a big thing to give up. Even if your (bought and paid for)
> server OS does nothing more than provide you with central management it's
> worth it (in my view). I have an AMD K6 333 running as a DC for my 5 home
> computers/users, and I wouldn't want it any other way. I'd think twice
> before going back to visiting every computer one at a time to make every
> change that you now only have to do only once.
>
> ...kurt
|