Sure. I forgot to mention, I don't know the various macro functions,
commands, etc., very well. So, no doubt, something rather simple probably
will work. I will kick this around a bit. Thanks!
"PY & Associates" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> If you have 5 staff with 1000 entries, looping is wasteful of resources.
> Would you consider Find previous method from bottom up (Since the list has
> been sorted)?
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Regards
> PY & Associates (GMT+8)
> "gifer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ltidnVKnx_L_UXXYnZ2dnUVZ_r-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> have a three column range holding the following data: Col1 employee name,
>> Col2 a date the name was entered into the table, Col3 the employee's
>> assignment
>> As the employee's assignment changes, the table is updated by adding
>> their
>> name to the end of the range in Col1, entering the date the assignment
>> became effective in Col2, and the new assignment in Col3. When (if) any
> new
>> assignments are entered, the entire range is sorted by Col1 (employee
> name)
>> in ascending order. Thus, from day to day, the range will grow longer as
> new
>> or duplicate names are entered. I have to keep the entire range for
>> historical tracking, but I need an additional table that holds only the
> most
>> recent or current assignments.
>>
>> The following "long" list should produce a resulting "short" list:
>> Columns
>> separated with semicolon for clarity here.
>>
>> LongList
>> Doe, John; 1/1/07; Line 1
>> Doe, John; 2/5/07; Line 3
>> Doe, John; 3/2/07; Line 4
>> Doe, Terry; 1/1/07; Line 2
>> Jun, Mary; 1/1/07; Line 4
>> Jun, Mary; 1/23/07; Line 7
>> Jun, Mary; 2/17/07; Line 3
>>
>> ShortList
>> Doe, John; 3/2/07; Line 4
>> Doe, Terry; 1/1/07; Line 2
>> Jun, Mary; 2/17/07; Line 3
>>
>> I'm thinking about looping (or moving) down the LongList row by row
> looking
>> at each entry in Col1 comparing to the next to determine the final entry
> of
>> the matches. Using that value, begin populating the new table. However,
>> as
> I
>> begin writing the looping, I don't know if I should use Next For, For
>> each
>> Next, or something else.
>>
>>
>
>
|