Ed wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2006 08:17:11 -0700, "YKhan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Conroe may tip up motherboardless
>> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32828
>
> Aren't any of the current Intel boards compatible with Conroe?
BTW, I just noticed a couple of stories I hadn't taken note of before,
which could be related to this. It's possible that Intel is working on a
new revision of its Conroe chipsets due to some problems that were
noticed when running in RAID5 mode.
Conroe shows dodgy RAID performance anomalies
"Right now, it seems that Intel has some serious problems when using
RAID5 configuration. If you are using an Intel's own baby, D975XBX
motherboard and put four drives in RAID5 array, an interesting overhead
and a slowdown will occur on all upcoming Conroes."
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32818
It's even turned up that the US government has rejected Woodcrest for
problems when running in RAID mode. Woodcrest was rejected early on in a
test that was supposed to last for 4 months. So the same problem occurs
whether we're talking about Conroe or Woodcrest.
US government unit throws Intel out over RAID problems
"WoodCrest systems were delivered for an evaluation for one of the US
government departments, and it all ended up in tears, with Woodcrest
being rejected in the first round of trials. The reason was that there
were severe problems when Woodcrest was paired with a 1E RAID field when
using IBM ServeRAID controllers. The problems didn't occur just in
benchmarking, it was the every-day usage model that produced unexpected
errors."
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32842
Yousuf Khan
--
Everybody was flying across the sky, Superman was out of town
