On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:54:28 GMT, "CWatters"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>"JSoul" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>> >a second call after
>> >buying it resulting in their telling me I needed a bridge and NOT an
>> >access point to connect the two networks.
>
>I believe that's correct. You use a bridge to connect two LANs. Another way
>would be remove the wired link between C and D and fit two wireless LAN
>cards into them.
>
>Is the signal strength ok?
>
>Try this site for an article on bridging...See "contents" at the bottom of
>the main panel..
>http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article36.php
>
>It does recommend using the same make of product at each end of the bridge.
>
>Later on if you get it working check what version of firmware the bridge
>has. This user had a similar set up. He could only get one PC to connect to
>the remote LAN (eg PC C but not D would work).
>http://hardware.mcse.ms/message230435.html
>
>And if you aren't using IE...
>http://forums.broadbandbuyer.co.uk/f...?TID=3242&PN=1
>
>Colin
Thanks much Colin. I found the article interesting but it seems to
recommend two bridges -- one on the end of each network.
Unfortunately it appears Linksys no longer makes a bridge for under
$150. That will teach me...
I can't use a wireless card for each device on "network 2" because one
of the components is actually not a PC but a device with an ethernet
connection. I'd need to connect another bridge aka gaming adapter to
that device. Thus it's easier to just have the wired network and a
bridge.
Will keep you guys posted as I work this out.