eweek.com:

"Microsoft began notifying customers Tuesday that it has established
new deadlines regarding how long they will be able to block Windows XP
Service Pack 2 from downloading automatically to their systems."

Ok. What's this "able to block".

Is at some point it NOT possible to prevent auto updating the XP
machines with SP2? I'm concerned with this "able" or "not able" to
block.
I upgrade the machines when and if I please to. Preferrably not on
monday for instance. I can not have Microsoft force a mega-download
and run their upgrade behind the scenes without getting my permission.

Could someone shed some light on this?

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>"Microsoft began notifying customers Tuesday that it has established
>new deadlines regarding how long they will be able to block Windows XP
>Service Pack 2 from downloading automatically to their systems."
>Ok. What's this "able to block".
>Is at some point it NOT possible to prevent auto updating the XP
>machines with SP2? I'm concerned with this "able" or "not able" to
>block.

This belongs to some software Microsoft provides to block installing
the SP on specific computers (=those on which this software is
installed). This does not affect the general availability of the SP2.

--
(tm)

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> eweek.com:
>
> "Microsoft began notifying customers Tuesday that it has established
> new deadlines regarding how long they will be able to block Windows XP
> Service Pack 2 from downloading automatically to their systems."
>
> Ok. What's this "able to block".
>
> Is at some point it NOT possible to prevent auto updating the XP
> machines with SP2? I'm concerned with this "able" or "not able" to
> block.
> I upgrade the machines when and if I please to. Preferrably not on
> monday for instance. I can not have Microsoft force a mega-download
> and run their upgrade behind the scenes without getting my permission.
>
> Could someone shed some light on this?
This is mostly for IT shops in large corps that have many PC with
auto update turned on. It allows updates to take place but blocks SP2
until it can be throughly tested in their environment.
Here's a link with more info:
http://www.computerworld.com/softwar...,95748,00.html

gls858

gls858 <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<uo$(E-Mail Removed)>...

> Here's a link with more info:
> http://www.computerworld.com/softwar...,95748,00.html

"The blocking mechanism will now prevent Automatic Updates"

This is the opposite what I read in eweek, where it said that by april
2005 it wasn't possible to block the update. I tried to find it again
on eweek, but it's as if they pulled the article.
Perhaps the writer screwed up.

ps
I guess I don't want to wait with the security updates:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1645829,00.asp
"The JPEG bug, an error in the GDI+ Type Library, has the potential
for widespread damage, as it can be delivered through an HTML e-mail."

LOL !

there was a patch to stop downloading sp2 into corporate
systems, in order to stop the crash of many companys
computers and the downfall of the economy. and the patch
must have an expiry date.


>-----Original Message-----
>gls858 <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:<uo$(E-Mail Removed)>...
>
>> Here's a link with more info:
>>
http://www.computerworld.com/softwar...,95748,00.html
>
>"The blocking mechanism will now prevent Automatic Updates"
>
>This is the opposite what I read in eweek, where it said
that by april
>2005 it wasn't possible to block the update. I tried to
find it again
>on eweek, but it's as if they pulled the article.
>Perhaps the writer screwed up.
>
>ps
>I guess I don't want to wait with the security updates:
>http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1645829,00.asp
>"The JPEG bug, an error in the GDI+ Type Library, has the
potential
>for widespread damage, as it can be delivered through an
HTML e-mail."
>
>LOL !
>.
>

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> eweek.com:
>
> "Microsoft began notifying customers Tuesday that it has established
> new deadlines regarding how long they will be able to block Windows XP
> Service Pack 2 from downloading automatically to their systems."
>
> Ok. What's this "able to block".
>
> Is at some point it NOT possible to prevent auto updating the XP
> machines with SP2? I'm concerned with this "able" or "not able" to
> block.
> I upgrade the machines when and if I please to. Preferrably not on
> monday for instance. I can not have Microsoft force a mega-download
> and run their upgrade behind the scenes without getting my permission.
>
> Could someone shed some light on this?

You can get CD direct from Microsoft. Mine arrived in 7 days
Blair